2011 WS Game 6 in perpetuum

Classic threads for your viewing pleasure.
Locked
User avatar
The Third Man
It rubs the lotion on its skin.
Posts: 8935
Joined: July 17 06, 1:00 pm

Re: 2011 WS Game 6 in perpetuum

Post by The Third Man »

fanforever wrote:Berkman's base hit on a 3-2 count with two outs was #2 to me
I'm sure a huge component of this is selection bias and hindsight, but I can scarcely recall ever feeling as confident that a player would come through as I did with Berkman there. Not even Pujols with 2 on against Lidge, though to be fair that was more because Lidge was scary good and loomed large from '04's NLCS.

Vidor
You've just been hit by...VidorSmarm™
Posts: 22956
Joined: June 10 10, 7:50 pm

Re: 2011 WS Game 6 in perpetuum

Post by Vidor »

"Confident" would be too strong a word but I believed that Berkman would come through. Whereas when Freese was batting the first time I was thinking about going outside and putting the new license plate sticker on my car.

jim
Red Lobster for the seafood lover in you
Posts: 50393
Joined: May 1 06, 2:41 pm

Re: 2011 WS Game 6 in perpetuum

Post by jim »

The top 3 moments for me were 1) Freese homerun 2) Freese triple 3) Berkman single

The reason I put 3) behind 2) was A) it was more dramatic - needed an extra base hit to tie it vs. a single and B) since 2) had already happened it took a little bit of air out of 3). The reason for A) is a) the win expectancy was lower and b) Berkman is a better hitter. b) is true because of i.) longer career, ii.) higher lifetime ops, and iii.) more playoff experience.

Hard to argue with logic.

crash2269
Everyday Player
Posts: 373
Joined: June 15 06, 6:31 am

Re: 2011 WS Game 6 in perpetuum

Post by crash2269 »

Jim - if I did not already know you were in a technical field the way you laid out that logic would have let me know you were.

User avatar
lukethedrifter
darjeeling sipping elite
Posts: 37257
Joined: October 17 06, 11:19 am
Location: Huis Clos

Re: 2011 WS Game 6 in perpetuum

Post by lukethedrifter »

I still say you guys are goofy for whining that a 50 point game in the NBA Championship shouldn't be recognized.

As for game 6, I go with Freese triple > Berkman rbi > Freese homer. Homer last only because since the Rangers finally didn't score I knew we were going to win.

Vidor
You've just been hit by...VidorSmarm™
Posts: 22956
Joined: June 10 10, 7:50 pm

Re: 2011 WS Game 6 in perpetuum

Post by Vidor »

lukethedrifter wrote:I still say you guys are goofy for whining that a 50 point game in the NBA Championship shouldn't be recognized.
We didn't all think that! 50 points in Game 7, against the Celtics, to win the title? Definitely has to be on there.

Vidor
You've just been hit by...VidorSmarm™
Posts: 22956
Joined: June 10 10, 7:50 pm

Re: 2011 WS Game 6 in perpetuum

Post by Vidor »

Meanwhile, others have said it before, but I very much like how "Game 6" now has its own meaning in Cardinal lingo. That's all you have to say, and other people will know what you are talking about.

crash2269
Everyday Player
Posts: 373
Joined: June 15 06, 6:31 am

Re: 2011 WS Game 6 in perpetuum

Post by crash2269 »

Vidor wrote:Meanwhile, others have said it before, but I very much like how "Game 6" now has its own meaning in Cardinal lingo.
Much like Game 6 has a special meaning to Red Sox fans, but ours is a bit happier.

Vidor
You've just been hit by...VidorSmarm™
Posts: 22956
Joined: June 10 10, 7:50 pm

Re: 2011 WS Game 6 in perpetuum

Post by Vidor »

Image

Sept. 25, 2012

jim
Red Lobster for the seafood lover in you
Posts: 50393
Joined: May 1 06, 2:41 pm

Re: 2011 WS Game 6 in perpetuum

Post by jim »

New book? Gotta' read it. What an ending. Never ever will we see something like this again.

Locked