I'm sure a huge component of this is selection bias and hindsight, but I can scarcely recall ever feeling as confident that a player would come through as I did with Berkman there. Not even Pujols with 2 on against Lidge, though to be fair that was more because Lidge was scary good and loomed large from '04's NLCS.fanforever wrote:Berkman's base hit on a 3-2 count with two outs was #2 to me
2011 WS Game 6 in perpetuum
- The Third Man
- It rubs the lotion on its skin.
- Posts: 8935
- Joined: July 17 06, 1:00 pm
Re: 2011 WS Game 6 in perpetuum
-
Vidor
- You've just been hit by...VidorSmarm™
- Posts: 22956
- Joined: June 10 10, 7:50 pm
Re: 2011 WS Game 6 in perpetuum
"Confident" would be too strong a word but I believed that Berkman would come through. Whereas when Freese was batting the first time I was thinking about going outside and putting the new license plate sticker on my car.
-
jim
- Red Lobster for the seafood lover in you
- Posts: 50393
- Joined: May 1 06, 2:41 pm
Re: 2011 WS Game 6 in perpetuum
The top 3 moments for me were 1) Freese homerun 2) Freese triple 3) Berkman single
The reason I put 3) behind 2) was A) it was more dramatic - needed an extra base hit to tie it vs. a single and B) since 2) had already happened it took a little bit of air out of 3). The reason for A) is a) the win expectancy was lower and b) Berkman is a better hitter. b) is true because of i.) longer career, ii.) higher lifetime ops, and iii.) more playoff experience.
Hard to argue with logic.
The reason I put 3) behind 2) was A) it was more dramatic - needed an extra base hit to tie it vs. a single and B) since 2) had already happened it took a little bit of air out of 3). The reason for A) is a) the win expectancy was lower and b) Berkman is a better hitter. b) is true because of i.) longer career, ii.) higher lifetime ops, and iii.) more playoff experience.
Hard to argue with logic.
-
crash2269
- Everyday Player
- Posts: 373
- Joined: June 15 06, 6:31 am
Re: 2011 WS Game 6 in perpetuum
Jim - if I did not already know you were in a technical field the way you laid out that logic would have let me know you were.
- lukethedrifter
- darjeeling sipping elite
- Posts: 37257
- Joined: October 17 06, 11:19 am
- Location: Huis Clos
Re: 2011 WS Game 6 in perpetuum
I still say you guys are goofy for whining that a 50 point game in the NBA Championship shouldn't be recognized.
As for game 6, I go with Freese triple > Berkman rbi > Freese homer. Homer last only because since the Rangers finally didn't score I knew we were going to win.
As for game 6, I go with Freese triple > Berkman rbi > Freese homer. Homer last only because since the Rangers finally didn't score I knew we were going to win.
-
Vidor
- You've just been hit by...VidorSmarm™
- Posts: 22956
- Joined: June 10 10, 7:50 pm
Re: 2011 WS Game 6 in perpetuum
We didn't all think that! 50 points in Game 7, against the Celtics, to win the title? Definitely has to be on there.lukethedrifter wrote:I still say you guys are goofy for whining that a 50 point game in the NBA Championship shouldn't be recognized.
-
Vidor
- You've just been hit by...VidorSmarm™
- Posts: 22956
- Joined: June 10 10, 7:50 pm
Re: 2011 WS Game 6 in perpetuum
Meanwhile, others have said it before, but I very much like how "Game 6" now has its own meaning in Cardinal lingo. That's all you have to say, and other people will know what you are talking about.
-
crash2269
- Everyday Player
- Posts: 373
- Joined: June 15 06, 6:31 am
Re: 2011 WS Game 6 in perpetuum
Much like Game 6 has a special meaning to Red Sox fans, but ours is a bit happier.Vidor wrote:Meanwhile, others have said it before, but I very much like how "Game 6" now has its own meaning in Cardinal lingo.
-
Vidor
- You've just been hit by...VidorSmarm™
- Posts: 22956
- Joined: June 10 10, 7:50 pm
Re: 2011 WS Game 6 in perpetuum

Sept. 25, 2012
-
jim
- Red Lobster for the seafood lover in you
- Posts: 50393
- Joined: May 1 06, 2:41 pm
Re: 2011 WS Game 6 in perpetuum
New book? Gotta' read it. What an ending. Never ever will we see something like this again.

