GatewayRedbirds.com

A Message Board Dedicated to Discussing St. Louis Cardinals Baseball!
It is currently May 18 13, 8:32 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 71 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: January 15 10, 4:30 pm 
Offline
Perennial All-Star
User avatar

Joined: December 22 06, 1:06 am
Posts: 6874
fanforever wrote:
Speaking of team cards...in the 70's I used to look forwqard to them. However the Chicago Cubs used to be the only team card with individual faces ....Why?

Image
Never knew why. Some teams would add a player or two with bubble heads next to the team photos but the Cubs apparently, or at least for some years, never went with the team photo. Not really that bad of an idea because the team cards you can rarely see anyone very clearly. I did like when you could see the stadium in the background.

A cool thing about buying cards in the early 70s is the free inserts you would get with packs.
ImageImageImageImage
And I'll throw in one more of my all time favorite cards. 1967 Topps Hank Aaron
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: January 15 10, 6:53 pm 
Offline
Game Thread General
User avatar

Joined: April 17 06, 5:03 pm
Posts: 40028
Location: Twilight Zone
1967 Topps Baseball cards where the best
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image

_________________
Image
Freese Game 6 Home Run
Relive the 2011 World Series


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: January 15 10, 6:55 pm 
Offline
Hall Of Famer
User avatar

Joined: October 28 06, 11:10 pm
Posts: 14730
Location: LOVE IT OR LEAVE IT
Richie Allen wrote:
fanforever wrote:
Speaking of team cards...in the 70's I used to look forwqard to them. However the Chicago Cubs used to be the only team card with individual faces ....Why?

Image
Never knew why. Some teams would add a player or two with bubble heads next to the team photos but the Cubs apparently, or at least for some years, never went with the team photo. Not really that bad of an idea because the team cards you can rarely see anyone very clearly. I did like when you could see the stadium in the background.

A cool thing about buying cards in the early 70s is the free inserts you would get with packs.
ImageImageImageImage
And I'll throw in one more of my all time favorite cards. 1967 Topps Hank Aaron
Image

that's because the Cubs have never been anything more than a series of faces... not an actual team.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: January 15 10, 7:50 pm 
Offline
Perennial All-Star
User avatar

Joined: December 22 06, 1:06 am
Posts: 6874
fanforever wrote:
1967 Topps Baseball cards where the best
You nailed it man! '67 is the greatest looking set they ever did. Pictures actually look like good photographs. Backs are very easy to read and have an unusual vertical layout (only complaint is they have to sacrifice some stat columns to fit). I've been working on this set for about 5 years now and I'm about halfway there (Ex/NM to M). The Gibson is another amazing looking card. Always loved the Mays card. Cepeda, great looking MVP year card. Of course the Ryan and Koufax aren't really part of the '67 set. It's too bad Koufax didn't have a final card with his complete statistics. Curse Topps for that.

I just recently decided that I'm going to start collecting cards that have been written on and defaced by kids. Preferably, mustaches, buck teeth or possibly eye patches. With the prices of some of these older cards, it may be the only way for me to go. I'd love to get my hands on one of these.
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: January 15 10, 9:48 pm 
Offline
President of the Fungous Society
User avatar

Joined: July 19 06, 11:04 am
Posts: 9425
Location: The Land of Kirk
Agree -- the 1967 Topps are outstanding.

I'm also partial to the 1969 set, as well.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: January 15 10, 10:48 pm 
Offline
Perennial All-Star
User avatar

Joined: December 22 06, 1:06 am
Posts: 6874
pop_haines wrote:
Agree -- the 1967 Topps are outstanding.

I'm also partial to the 1969 set, as well.

The '69 set would be great by itself but was somewhat of a disappointment after being sort of similar to the '68 set. They even used the same pictures for some cards. I definitely think the '69 set was an improvement, however.
ImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: January 16 10, 2:19 am 
Offline
President of the Fungous Society
User avatar

Joined: July 19 06, 11:04 am
Posts: 9425
Location: The Land of Kirk
Yeah, I noticed the recycling too, Richie.

Still, I disliked the '68 set for that burlap bag look
(a huge letdown after the glory of 1967) and avidly
collected the '69's instead.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: January 16 10, 2:47 am 
Offline
Game Thread General
User avatar

Joined: April 17 06, 5:03 pm
Posts: 40028
Location: Twilight Zone
I noticed most of the pictures taken were spring training shots. second most where at Either Shea or Yankee Stadium when a team visited NY

_________________
Image
Freese Game 6 Home Run
Relive the 2011 World Series


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: January 16 10, 3:03 am 
Offline
Doddering Fool
User avatar

Joined: December 12 07, 3:53 am
Posts: 3981
Location: Oregon
I collected cards when I was boy in the early 90s. I have an apple box full of Donruss cards that my grandchildren will have to pay someone to take. Seriously, I bet the recycling guy wouldn't even take them. They brought me a ton of joy when I was 9 and 10 years old though.

Some of the Diamond Kings series are delightfully creepy.
Image

_________________
"Isn't it just like BirdBot 6000 [the deity of the Beltran's bizarre cult] to send us to a team called the 'Cardinals?'" -Jessica Beltran
VolatileLyle


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: January 17 10, 2:18 pm 
Offline
Perennial All-Star
User avatar

Joined: December 22 06, 1:06 am
Posts: 6874
Topps being lazy again. 1970 Rich Allen and 1972 Rich Allen. I could possibly understand it if Topps recycled a picture of Phil Gagliano or someone but Dick Allen? Hank Aaron? Ridiculous. Apparently, if Allen was traded to any team that wore red, this picture (as a Phllie) was the one to use. And where did the name "Rich" come from?
ImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 71 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: doe_boy, lukethedrifter, MinorLeagueGuy, stlouie_lipp, Swirls, tennesseecard, Vidor and 13 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group