Which is more likely, Jeter or Pujols w/ a new team?

Discuss all things Cardinals Baseball

Which is a more likely scenario...?

Pujols
20
57%
Jeter
0
No votes
Neither--both will re-sign
15
43%
 
Total votes: 35

User avatar
go birds
-go birds
Posts: 32053
Joined: February 5 10, 9:54 am

Which is more likely, Jeter or Pujols w/ a new team?

Post by go birds »

Future Hall of Famer Derek Jeter in a different uniform or future Hall of Famer Albert Pujols in a different uniform?

Both are free agents soon--Jeter next year and Pujols in 2012. Both are icons in their city (and baseball as a whole). Both came up through their team's system. Both have won a world series. Both have played a pivotal role in their team's success over their career.

I say Pujols in a different uniform is more likely given how much it's gonna take to sign him. The yanks can afford to to re-sign their fan favorite whereas the cards may not be able to re-sign Pujols.

User avatar
vinsanity
Chili dog truther
Posts: 8833
Joined: July 3 06, 2:19 pm
Location: Indianapolis

Re: Which is a more likely scenario...?

Post by vinsanity »

Jeter won't possibly go in as anything other than a Yankee...even if he switches teams after this year.

AWvsCBsteeeerike3
"I could totally eat a pig butt, if smoked correctly!"
Posts: 27537
Joined: August 5 08, 11:24 am
Location: Thinking of the Children

Re: Which is more likely, Jeter or Pujols w/ a new team?

Post by AWvsCBsteeeerike3 »

I don't get how the Cardinals expect to re-sign Pujols if they apparently are serious about their budget (and I see no reason for them to trade Ludwick if they weren't serious) and if Pujols is serious about getting paid at least close to market value (25 mil min based off what Howard got). And, if they do, obviously they don't know how to build a stars and scrubs team picking up two of the worst players in the league (Miles and Feliz) while already employing everyday offensive [expletive] (skip, ryan, molina and lopez).

\rant
Last edited by AWvsCBsteeeerike3 on August 31 10, 9:47 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
mcgee51taguchi99
Perennial All-Star
Posts: 3641
Joined: May 25 06, 2:47 pm
Location: Crying/injoyin watching tha Crew in tha Playoffs!!!

Re: Which is more likely, Jeter or Pujols w/ a new team?

Post by mcgee51taguchi99 »

AWvsCBsteeeerike3 wrote:I don't get how the Cardinals expect to re-sign Pujols if they apparently are serious about their budget (and I see no reason for them to trade Ludwick if they weren't serious) and if Pujols is serious about getting paid at least close to market value (25 mil min based off what Howard got). And, if they do, obviously they don't know how to build a stars and scrubs team picking up two of the worst players in the league (Miles and Feliz) while already employing everyday offensive [expletive] (skip, ryan, molina and lopez).
Woah! Let's not forget about Suppan. HEYO!

User avatar
vinsanity
Chili dog truther
Posts: 8833
Joined: July 3 06, 2:19 pm
Location: Indianapolis

Re: Which is more likely, Jeter or Pujols w/ a new team?

Post by vinsanity »

AWvsCBsteeeerike3 wrote:I don't get how the Cardinals expect to re-sign Pujols if they apparently are serious about their budget (and I see no reason for them to trade Ludwick if they weren't serious)
They traded Ludwick probably to clear payroll and obtain a starter whose been pretty solid so far.
and if Pujols is serious about getting paid at least close to market value (25 mil min based off what Howard got).
By trading Ludwick for Jay, you can tack Ludwick's salary on to Albert's to get to the $25M without moving payroll an inch.
And, if they do, obviously they don't know how to build a stars and scrubs team picking up two of the worst players in the league (Miles and Feliz) while already employing everyday offensive [expletive] (skip, ryan, molina and lopez).
Well we disagree here, had Freese not gotten injured Feliz wouldn't have been needed. Lopez has been bad lately, but isn't terrible in his career and is a great Util IF to have - he means no Miles. Ryan is there for defensive reasons, but stands out cause Flip, Feliz and Skip haven't hit as well as they should. Skip isn't an 800 OPS hitter they thought he was when he moved to 2B last year. The team was built just fine, we're 4 games under our pythag. That would put us 2 games out of first right now behind an extremely surprising Reds team. When you win ~90 games I think you've done a pretty damn good job putting a team together.

AWvsCBsteeeerike3
"I could totally eat a pig butt, if smoked correctly!"
Posts: 27537
Joined: August 5 08, 11:24 am
Location: Thinking of the Children

Re: Which is more likely, Jeter or Pujols w/ a new team?

Post by AWvsCBsteeeerike3 »

vinsanity wrote:
And, if they do, obviously they don't know how to build a stars and scrubs team picking up two of the worst players in the league (Miles and Feliz) while already employing everyday offensive [expletive] (skip, ryan, molina and lopez).
Well we disagree here, had Freese not gotten injured Feliz wouldn't have been needed. Lopez has been bad lately, but isn't terrible in his career and is a great Util IF to have - he means no Miles. Ryan is there for defensive reasons, but stands out cause Flip, Feliz and Skip haven't hit as well as they should. Skip isn't an 800 OPS hitter they thought he was when he moved to 2B last year. The team was built just fine, we're 4 games under our pythag. That would put us 2 games out of first right now behind an extremely surprising Reds team. When you win ~90 games I think you've done a pretty damn good job putting a team together.
I was ranting.... naturally there's going to be some irrational thoughts. No need to get all up in arms about it. Really, I'm just pissed that they have so much talent and are not going to make the playoffs and it shows up in all topics.

User avatar
Bo Hart
Perennial All-Star
Posts: 8770
Joined: April 14 06, 9:50 pm

Re: Which is more likely, Jeter or Pujols w/ a new team?

Post by Bo Hart »

To me this isn't even a question at all.

The chances of Pujols signing with a new team are unlikely, but it's certainly possible. I'd say it's a 30% chance (completely arbitrary guess there).

However, the chances of Jeter bolting to a new team are literally 0%. The Yanks want to retain him. Jeter wants to say. Payroll is a non-issue. He will stay. Guaranteed. To me it's basically implausible.

Magneto2.0
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 18018
Joined: June 16 07, 2:12 pm

Re: Which is more likely, Jeter or Pujols w/ a new team?

Post by Magneto2.0 »

I live in NY, and Jeter resigning isn't as much as a forgone conclusion as y'all seem to make it out to be. While, I'd be surprised he signed with another team, I don't think it's at all outside the realm of possibilities.

User avatar
vinsanity
Chili dog truther
Posts: 8833
Joined: July 3 06, 2:19 pm
Location: Indianapolis

Re: Which is more likely, Jeter or Pujols w/ a new team?

Post by vinsanity »

Kyle wrote:To me this isn't even a question at all.

The chances of Pujols signing with a new team are unlikely, but it's certainly possible. I'd say it's a 30% chance (completely arbitrary guess there).

However, the chances of Jeter bolting to a new team are literally 0%. The Yanks want to retain him. Jeter wants to say. Payroll is a non-issue. He will stay. Guaranteed. To me it's basically implausible.
Well even if Jeter bolts, there's 0 chance he does enough to go in wearing that hat. It'd be like Wade Boggs wanting to go in as a Devil ray.

He spent 15? years in NY and even 5 stellar years elsewhere won't be enough to swing it. I literally don't think it's possible he'd go in wearing any other hat.

If Albert left, hit his 500th, 600th and maybe 700th wins a ring, maybe a TC, a few MVP's he'd likely go in for that team.

jagtrader
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 12362
Joined: June 5 06, 10:01 am

Re: Which is more likely, Jeter or Pujols w/ a new team?

Post by jagtrader »

I have no idea, nor do I care, about Jeter's future. I think the odds are against Pujols re-signing with the Cardinals. He seems the obvious answer to this question.
Last edited by jagtrader on August 31 10, 10:46 am, edited 1 time in total.

Post Reply