GatewayRedbirds.com

A Message Board Dedicated to Discussing St. Louis Cardinals Baseball!
It is currently May 19 13, 5:50 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 48 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Jon Jay
PostPosted: May 2 12, 8:52 pm 
Offline
The Last Word
User avatar

Joined: July 3 06, 2:19 pm
Posts: 7166
pioneer98 wrote:
wart57 wrote:
BABIP is an interesting thing, I don't know how much it has to do with luck, and the old saying "hitting them where they ain't." Putting a ball in the gap is a skill. Not hitting can-o-corn fly balls is a skill; not grounding out feebly to short is a skill....and so on.

They say on average BABIP ends up around .300 when you average it for all players. But each player has their own for their career. It probably isn't realistic that Jay's BABIP will stay at .350, but that doesn't mean it will regress all the way back to .300 or below either. I think that's kind of what some people are saying in this thread.

Yup, certain things affect BABIP. Ichiro has a career BABIP of .350 because he legs out IF singles and more likely to hit a 'bloop' single over the IF but not a scorching liner to the OF. Or someone like Mark Reynolds or Adam Dunn whose BABIP is quite a bit higher than their average cause they K so much.

Jay's BA usually runs about 50 points lower than his BABIP, but right now it's 8 and his infield hit % is up a bit. It's possible he's the type of hitter who will maintain a BABIP of .330, but he's not the type of hitter who could maintain a .415 BABIP. He'll likely regress closer to a .350 average pretty quick, but after more than a season and a half, there's not a whole lotta reason to think his BABIP won't normalize around .330-.340 just cause of how he hits.

_________________
Tambourine Man wrote:
Mitt's a tool used for scooping white balls out of the dirt. A catcher, if you will.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jon Jay
PostPosted: May 2 12, 9:04 pm 
Offline
just can't quit you.
User avatar

Joined: April 18 06, 4:33 pm
Posts: 14620
Location: drowning in a sea of estrogen
cpebbles wrote:
I think most big leaguers would tell you that the idea of guiding a 92 MPH fastball on the low outside corner into a 15 degree wedge no man's land between first and second base is an extraordinarily rare skill to possess even at that level.


Yet many can do it without thinking - Stan being one of them.

_________________
Fawlty Towers wrote:
Polly: Don't panic!
Basil Fawlty: [shouting] What else is there to do?


Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jon Jay
PostPosted: May 2 12, 10:42 pm 
Offline
Perennial All-Star

Joined: June 10 10, 7:50 pm
Posts: 6840
BW23 wrote:
I've grown to like him more and more. I didn't have a very high expectation from him in any regard, but he's exceeded what I thought he could already. I love having him in the lineup, and I'm not sure what I'd do once everyone is healthy.


?

Jay's going to play center field every day unless he gets hurt.

_________________
"This is a heavyweight bout indeed."--John Rooney, Oct. 27, 2011


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jon Jay
PostPosted: May 2 12, 11:05 pm 
Offline
All-Star
User avatar

Joined: September 24 08, 10:31 am
Posts: 1264
Location: Illinois St.
He's a very nice player to have around, while cost controlled. Not when you have to pay him big money.

_________________
JUGGERMOTTE!!!!

Image

#? Some Guy #6 Stan the Man #7 Holliday


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jon Jay
PostPosted: May 3 12, 12:18 am 
Offline
Hall Of Famer
User avatar

Joined: November 9 06, 6:45 am
Posts: 16002
Location: beachwalking with models
wart57 wrote:
haltz wrote:
I don't think he's a difference-maker, but for now he's a guy who helps you afford players that are and he's fine in an everyday role.

Part of the reason that people and projection systems are skeptical of his production, is that the list of career BABIPs over .350 is short and full of Hall of Famers. Same goes for Freese.

Ty Cobb .379
David Freese .368
Rogers Hornsby .366
Derek Jeter .361
Rod Carew .358
Ichiro Suzuki .357
Miguel Cabrera .354
Harry Heilmann .351
Joe Jackson .351
Tris Speaker .350
Jon Jay .350

But that's not to say that they can't still be good players if less hits start to fall.

BABIP is an interesting thing, I don't know how much it has to do with luck, and the old saying "hitting them where they ain't." Putting a ball in the gap is a skill. Not hitting can-o-corn fly balls is a skill; not grounding out feebly to short is a skill....and so on.

BABIP is a skill. Those are the top BABIPs of all time, and it's a who's who of great hitters and Hall of Famers. I'm saying that it's worth wondering if Freese and Jay might regress to the mean a little before ending up as skillful as the top ten of everyone who has ever played the game.

_________________
abstract backpack vegan skateboards, etc


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jon Jay
PostPosted: May 3 12, 5:03 am 
Offline
has a girlfriend you guys
User avatar

Joined: October 17 06, 11:19 am
Posts: 22190
Location: Walking down Main St getting to know the concrete
vinsanity wrote:
Or someone like Mark Reynolds or Adam Dunn whose BABIP is quite a bit higher than their average cause they K so much.


??

_________________
Cox@2nd wrote:
I want ice in the 2 hole


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jon Jay
PostPosted: May 3 12, 7:03 am 
Offline
Hall Of Famer
User avatar

Joined: April 17 06, 11:25 am
Posts: 23534
Vidor wrote:
BW23 wrote:
I've grown to like him more and more. I didn't have a very high expectation from him in any regard, but he's exceeded what I thought he could already. I love having him in the lineup, and I'm not sure what I'd do once everyone is healthy.


?

Jay's going to play center field every day unless he gets hurt.


Yeah, he's got the lock on CF because he's the only one on the roster who can still play it well. Offensively, the best 3 OF's we could trot out there would be Holliday, Beltran, Craig--but that's akin to playing an all-doubles defense.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jon Jay
PostPosted: May 3 12, 8:21 am 
Offline
Veteran Player
User avatar

Joined: November 8 06, 6:35 pm
Posts: 550
Location: O'Fallon, Missouri
heyzeus wrote:
TAZ wrote:
How does he compare to the 15 other NL starting CF'ers?


Better than humping a cantaloupe. Not as good as marrying Halle Berry.



This might make the most sense out of anything I've ever read on any topic ever.
And thanks for the numbers. That lines up with the eye-test.

_________________
"If you wish to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first invent the universe."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jon Jay
PostPosted: May 3 12, 8:30 am 
Offline
Veteran Player
User avatar

Joined: November 8 06, 6:35 pm
Posts: 550
Location: O'Fallon, Missouri
AWvsCBsteeeerike3 wrote:
That's an interesting statement wart. I have always wondered how much control batters have over their ability to place a ball when they hit it.

For example, in the 10th inning of Game 6, did Berkman see how dep the outfield was and then handle the pitch well enough to keep it from going too deep; would have have been able to drive it into a gap had the OF been playing regularly; or did he simply try to hit the ball as hard as he could, that's all he could do, and we're all lucky that the Rangers had the 'no doubles' OF alignment?

In comparison, obviously Jay was lucky to get a little bloop land earlier that inning, and he had no control over that.


I can't remember who I heard it from, but it was someone pretty good at playing baseball... they said "Batters are hit producers, not hit directors."

But the ability to try to hit to certain fields is definitely a skill that is preached early on. I was watching highlights from the Nats I think and the infield was playing Werth (I think) with a really dramatic pull-shift. They showed 2 of his abs in a row and you could tell he was just trying to guide the ball in the hole between 1st and 2nd. Not hit hard at all but got singles both times, leading off an inning, trying to get on base.

So that's an example of what is being talked about with BABIP. I used to think that you'd be able to tell how much of a low BABIP was luck by only factoring LD%. Cause if all a guy does is hit weak little 6-3 grounders, he'll have a low BABIP but you can't say the usual "he's just been unlucky!" No, he's been getting beat.
On the flip side, if a guy has a knack for putting the ball in the general area he wants to, he'll have a higher BABIP, but you couldn't say "he's been lucky!" Well, maybe a little, but he's doing what he's trying.

It's almost like there needs to be a "success at doing what you're trying to do" stat. Hitting the ball to the right side to move a guy over. Hitting a flyball to the outfield for a sac fly. Hitting a line drive with no on or a guy on 2nd with 2 outs. Pushing a groundball to a vacated spot due to an infield shift. Does something like that exist?

_________________
"If you wish to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first invent the universe."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jon Jay
PostPosted: May 3 12, 9:25 am 
Offline
Hall Of Famer
User avatar

Joined: April 18 06, 5:54 pm
Posts: 10429
Location: Las Vegas, NV
TAZ wrote:

It's almost like there needs to be a "success at doing what you're trying to do" stat. Hitting the ball to the right side to move a guy over. Hitting a flyball to the outfield for a sac fly. Hitting a line drive with no on or a guy on 2nd with 2 outs. Pushing a groundball to a vacated spot due to an infield shift. Does something like that exist?



I doubt such a stat exists, although perhaps you could extrapolate it by noting when a player hits the ball to an area where statistics show he doesn't usually hit it to, but that's definitive.

But there are ballplayers who do manage to cultivate an ability to control the bat sufficiently to hit the ball where they ain't, as the old Willie Keeler quote goes. Wasn't Rod Carew said to be a master of that? IIRC, Carew had a number of different batting stances, employing multiple stances even during a single game, in order to do this. And on a much, much, MUCH lower level, I can remember shifting my stance in an office softball game so I could hit the ball to right field instead of left, mainly because I wanted to see my boss have to chase after it.

_________________
"You have to be concerned about the future, but you also have to be more concerned about the present. If you have to give up two or three young kids - who may not be able to play for several years - to get help for your team now, you have to do it." - Bing Devine, 1999

"They call baseball a game because it's too screwed up to be a business." - Jim Bouton, 1971.

"Big deal. Anyone can win games when the other team doesn't score any runs." - Curt Flood to Bob Gibson, circa 1968


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 48 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 8 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group