GatewayRedbirds.com

A Message Board Dedicated to Discussing St. Louis Cardinals Baseball!
It is currently May 23 13, 8:26 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 29 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: August 9 12, 11:52 pm 
Offline
Hall Of Famer
User avatar

Joined: August 5 08, 11:24 am
Posts: 10554
Location: wwtlrd?
Radbird wrote:
jim wrote:
- Melky for sure
- the White Sox and the A's, and to a lesser extent the Nats.
- McCutcheon.

Can't argue with those. Or Trout. And don't forget Harper. Again, like Trout, he was a top prospect, but who expected this at age 19?

I would add the Pirates and Orioles. Good to see those franchises compete again.

I don't understand why people associate trout and harper this year other than they are both young. Trout has a 1.000+ ops while harper has a .740 ops. Both young and good. Buy only one has truly outperformed what was expected.

_________________
trill wrote:
Yeah, cuz you and Jenny just didn't have it. Me and Jenny. We got it. I can unlock her defense with a well-timed through ball and a towering header.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: August 10 12, 12:38 am 
Offline
Perennial All-Star
User avatar

Joined: December 22 06, 1:06 am
Posts: 6877
AWvsCBsteeeerike3 wrote:
Radbird wrote:
jim wrote:
- Melky for sure
- the White Sox and the A's, and to a lesser extent the Nats.
- McCutcheon.

Can't argue with those. Or Trout. And don't forget Harper. Again, like Trout, he was a top prospect, but who expected this at age 19?

I would add the Pirates and Orioles. Good to see those franchises compete again.

I don't understand why people associate trout and harper this year other than they are both young. Trout has a 1.000+ ops while harper has a .740 ops. Both young and good. Buy only one has truly outperformed what was expected.

Harper started unbelievable but has certainly fizzled a bit since. Trout right now looks like the better player but I wouldn't completely count on it yet.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: August 10 12, 6:52 am 
Offline
Everyday Player
User avatar

Joined: May 22 12, 1:52 am
Posts: 327
The A's, AJ Burnett, and RA Dickey.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: August 10 12, 7:14 am 
Offline
far too respected for anyone to give him a silly rank
User avatar

Joined: April 18 06, 5:08 pm
Posts: 28524
Location: Third boxcar, midnight train
Good call on Dickey, planet & Roshambo.

_________________
Image
"I love to play this game of baseball - I love putting on this uniform."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: August 10 12, 7:23 am 
Offline
Yearns for retractable genitalia
User avatar

Joined: April 21 06, 10:14 am
Posts: 21003
Location: Austin, TX
Yadi, the 20/20 threat!

_________________
sighyoung wrote:
You wanted the glamour of a space walk and gerbil experiments, so deal with the combustion and shrapnel.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: August 10 12, 11:45 am 
Offline
Next Gen Wart
User avatar

Joined: April 22 06, 6:53 pm
Posts: 7102
Location: St. Louis
Richie Allen wrote:
I had a feeling Melky would do well in SF. Thought McCutcheon's potential was overrated. Thought Trout was going to flop. Hoped Harper would flop. Doubted Hosmer but then thought he must be the real thing after a hot start. Thought C Santana was going to have a big year. Edwin Encarnacion WTF? Thought David Wright might be nearing the end. Alex Rios?!? Had a feeling about Josh Willingham but not this good. Chapman has surprised me (14 BB??). Liked Sale but didn't see this coming. Are they shutting him down after a few more starts? [expletive] Fernando Rodney?


The White Sox are putting Sale on a six man rotation, giving him 6-7 days rest inebtween starts. So he should only have 7-8 more starts this year. That should put him at around 180 IP.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: August 10 12, 12:39 pm 
Offline
Sobbing quietly during Fox programming
User avatar

Joined: June 9 06, 3:51 pm
Posts: 7057
AWvsCBsteeeerike3 wrote:
Radbird wrote:
jim wrote:
- Melky for sure
- the White Sox and the A's, and to a lesser extent the Nats.
- McCutcheon.

Can't argue with those. Or Trout. And don't forget Harper. Again, like Trout, he was a top prospect, but who expected this at age 19?

I would add the Pirates and Orioles. Good to see those franchises compete again.

I don't understand why people associate trout and harper this year other than they are both young. Trout has a 1.000+ ops while harper has a .740 ops. Both young and good. Buy only one has truly outperformed what was expected.


See, I'd argue Harper at 19 freaking years old is far surpassing expectations thus far. He would still be the youngest player in AA I believe (though Bogaerts is around the same age).

Harper is an above average major leaguer already, and at his age, historically those guys end up in the Hall of Fame. Trout at a similar age was much worse. Trout might be having the best season of his career...it's not unprecedented, as A-Rod peaked at 21 as well.

My best friend is a huge Royals fan, and I remember telling him Sale was best college pitcher that year and when they took Colon, I still haven't let him live that down (he wasn't pleased with Colon either).

The White Sox have really surprised me.

Pirates' pitching.

How bad I think Matheny has been. I mean, his son is obviously a genius (attending Missouri State in the fall), so I'm surprised at how many things he's done I've felt have been folly.

The Reds record. They have very few elite talents outside of Votto, but they're playing great until recently.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: August 10 12, 1:53 pm 
Offline
Hall Of Famer
User avatar

Joined: August 5 08, 11:24 am
Posts: 10554
Location: wwtlrd?
phins wrote:
See, I'd argue Harper at 19 freaking years old is far surpassing expectations thus far. He would still be the youngest player in AA I believe (though Bogaerts is around the same age).

Harper is an above average major leaguer already, and at his age, historically those guys end up in the Hall of Fame. Trout at a similar age was much worse. Trout might be having the best season of his career...it's not unprecedented, as A-Rod peaked at 21 as well.


Trout just turned 21 yesterday or two days ago.

Regardless of who is going to be the better player, which I would still argue is Trout, a 20 year old putting up a 190 OPS+ is more suprising than a 19 year old putting up a 100 OPS+, imho.

_________________
trill wrote:
Yeah, cuz you and Jenny just didn't have it. Me and Jenny. We got it. I can unlock her defense with a well-timed through ball and a towering header.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: August 10 12, 2:19 pm 
Offline
far too respected for anyone to give him a silly rank
User avatar

Joined: April 18 06, 5:08 pm
Posts: 28524
Location: Third boxcar, midnight train
I understand, Beerstrike, but I haven't seen too many perform at this level while still a teenager even though he has cooled somewhat.

And I'm not saying he's better than Trout (that'll play out over the next few years), just that I'm surprised.

_________________
Image
"I love to play this game of baseball - I love putting on this uniform."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: August 10 12, 2:28 pm 
Offline
Hall Of Famer
User avatar

Joined: August 5 08, 11:24 am
Posts: 10554
Location: wwtlrd?
Whateva! I'm a trout lover on a board full of harper lovers!

_________________
trill wrote:
Yeah, cuz you and Jenny just didn't have it. Me and Jenny. We got it. I can unlock her defense with a well-timed through ball and a towering header.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 29 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: BigDCardlvr, Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], JackofDiamonds, Vidor and 12 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group