I'll provide the only good answer.Big Amoco Sign wrote:s a "better Freddie Freeman" someone you'd take for 10 years?
Depends on the price.
I'll provide the only good answer.Big Amoco Sign wrote:s a "better Freddie Freeman" someone you'd take for 10 years?
I think plenty of people here (including you, maybe) have said that giving relievers big money is foolish, because of the volatility.Big Amoco Sign wrote:
Saying Heyward is a comp that shows how the contract might fail is stupid and is just like saying "Cardinals shouldn't sign a reliever because Cecil, Gregerson, and Holland failed."
Big Amoco Sign wrote:If you're going to compare, then pick similar players with profiles that are similar, like their bat and defensive game. Especially when considering a long term contract and aging factors.
Dunn couldn't base run and couldn't play a lick of defense.
and neither can harper!Big Amoco Sign wrote:Dunn couldn't base run and couldn't play a lick of defense.
they both walk a ton and hit a lot of HR...bad at defense and can't run basesBig Amoco Sign wrote:If you're going to compare, then pick similar players with profiles that are similar, like their bat and defensive game.
I said Harper's defense. Considering it's similar to Trout and Yelich's.Socnorb11 wrote:
I have it on good authority that defense is massively overblown.
this makes no sense...do betterBig Amoco Sign wrote:Cardsfantx, if you say Harper is a better Dunn, then you have to say Harper is a better Freddie Freeman.
Is a "better Freddie Freeman" someone you'd take for 10 years?