Page 9 of 9
Re: Mike Trout
Posted: May 13 19, 10:40 am
by MAGA
When know-it-alls meet humble smart people. God it's beautiful.
Re: Mike Trout
Posted: May 13 19, 10:44 am
by Big Amoco Sign
No goal posts were moved.
The subject at hand was quantifying IBB.
Re: Mike Trout
Posted: May 13 19, 3:13 pm
by Popeye_Card
I’m not sure why it even matters. The 2000’s were insane for Bonds. You can’t look at his stats without saying “holy [expletive]”. It is up to everyone if they want to hold the PED stuff against him for that period or not.
Re: Mike Trout
Posted: July 1 22, 12:23 pm
by Magneto2.0
Just for ish and giggles, would a package of:
Carlson, Gorman, Walker, Liberatore and Winn get it done? I think so.
Re: Mike Trout
Posted: July 1 22, 1:04 pm
by Phansett
Seems like a lot to give up for a late inning pinch-hitter/sub for Bader.
Re: Mike Trout
Posted: July 1 22, 1:11 pm
by mikechamp
Keith Law... is a moron.
Re: Mike Trout
Posted: July 1 22, 1:49 pm
by Joe Shlabotnik
Yeah. RIGHT.
There's no 'Muddle' in 'Trout'.
Re: Mike Trout
Posted: July 1 22, 2:02 pm
by a_smith
Joe Shlabotnik wrote: ↑July 1 22, 1:49 pm
Yeah. RIGHT.
There's no 'Muddle' in 'Trout'.
You underestimate Mo.
I bet we have Kilgore Trout by the trading deadline.
Re: Mike Trout
Posted: July 1 22, 4:23 pm
by Radbird
Mo would prolly call Steve Trout based on the theory that soft-tossing lefties age well.
Re: Mike Trout
Posted: July 1 22, 4:47 pm
by obucard
Radbird wrote: ↑July 1 22, 4:23 pm
Mo would prolly call Steve Trout based on the theory that soft-tossing lefties age well.
Steve at least has won a playoff game.