Holy wow, that's a bad review for guy drafted in the top 50!"....he may make for a good backup catcher who plays the game the right way."
P.S. This Harvey guy is still on the board, and we're at pick #52.
Holy wow, that's a bad review for guy drafted in the top 50!"....he may make for a good backup catcher who plays the game the right way."
How many other teams' fans have this article posted about their owner?Kyle wrote:He dropped to what -- #28?ToughGuy_BlueShirt wrote:I'm starting to get sick of the money issue crap. Baseball isn't cheap, why try to compete if you don't want to pay for anyone? If you get good players, you're going to have to pay them. So you and the Cardinals rather draft mediocre players because they cost less and let the big time prospects go to the teams that will pay for big talent.
How many other teams' fans do you think are playing the "god we're cheap" card?
Edit: and the font thing is a lame fad that I won't take part in.
How many teams have a payroll nearing $100 million?ToughGuy_BlueShirt wrote:How many other teams' fans have this article posted about their owner?Kyle wrote:He dropped to what -- #28?ToughGuy_BlueShirt wrote:I'm starting to get sick of the money issue crap. Baseball isn't cheap, why try to compete if you don't want to pay for anyone? If you get good players, you're going to have to pay them. So you and the Cardinals rather draft mediocre players because they cost less and let the big time prospects go to the teams that will pay for big talent.
How many other teams' fans do you think are playing the "god we're cheap" card?
Edit: and the font thing is a lame fad that I won't take part in.
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2007/w ... index.html
who cares?ToughGuy_BlueShirt wrote:How many other teams' fans have this article posted about their owner?Kyle wrote:He dropped to what -- #28?ToughGuy_BlueShirt wrote:I'm starting to get sick of the money issue crap. Baseball isn't cheap, why try to compete if you don't want to pay for anyone? If you get good players, you're going to have to pay them. So you and the Cardinals rather draft mediocre players because they cost less and let the big time prospects go to the teams that will pay for big talent.
How many other teams' fans do you think are playing the "god we're cheap" card?
Edit: and the font thing is a lame fad that I won't take part in.
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2007/w ... index.html
Well, since the Cardinals are at 90 mil, I'm going to take "nearing" from you to mean at least 88 then. And in that case half of the major leagues. 15. http://blog.sportscolumn.com/story/2007/4/9/1367/60158/Kyle wrote:How many teams have a payroll nearing $100 million?ToughGuy_BlueShirt wrote:How many other teams' fans have this article posted about their owner?Kyle wrote:He dropped to what -- #28?ToughGuy_BlueShirt wrote:I'm starting to get sick of the money issue crap. Baseball isn't cheap, why try to compete if you don't want to pay for anyone? If you get good players, you're going to have to pay them. So you and the Cardinals rather draft mediocre players because they cost less and let the big time prospects go to the teams that will pay for big talent.
How many other teams' fans do you think are playing the "god we're cheap" card?
Edit: and the font thing is a lame fad that I won't take part in.
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2007/w ... index.html
Faceman wrote:who cares?ToughGuy_BlueShirt wrote:How many other teams' fans have this article posted about their owner?Kyle wrote:He dropped to what -- #28?ToughGuy_BlueShirt wrote:I'm starting to get sick of the money issue crap. Baseball isn't cheap, why try to compete if you don't want to pay for anyone? If you get good players, you're going to have to pay them. So you and the Cardinals rather draft mediocre players because they cost less and let the big time prospects go to the teams that will pay for big talent.
How many other teams' fans do you think are playing the "god we're cheap" card?
Edit: and the font thing is a lame fad that I won't take part in.
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2007/w ... index.html
DeWitt says we're closer to $96 million.ToughGuy_BlueShirt wrote:Well, since the Cardinals are at 90 mil, I'm going to take "nearing" from you to mean at least 88 then. And in that case half of the major leagues. 15. http://blog.sportscolumn.com/story/2007/4/9/1367/60158/Kyle wrote:How many teams have a payroll nearing $100 million?ToughGuy_BlueShirt wrote:How many other teams' fans have this article posted about their owner?Kyle wrote:He dropped to what -- #28?ToughGuy_BlueShirt wrote:I'm starting to get sick of the money issue crap. Baseball isn't cheap, why try to compete if you don't want to pay for anyone? If you get good players, you're going to have to pay them. So you and the Cardinals rather draft mediocre players because they cost less and let the big time prospects go to the teams that will pay for big talent.
How many other teams' fans do you think are playing the "god we're cheap" card?
Edit: and the font thing is a lame fad that I won't take part in.
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2007/w ... index.html
Exactly, it's who you want to believe. I really don't want to believe Dewitt.Kyle wrote:DeWitt says we're closer to $96 million.ToughGuy_BlueShirt wrote:Well, since the Cardinals are at 90 mil, I'm going to take "nearing" from you to mean at least 88 then. And in that case half of the major leagues. 15. http://blog.sportscolumn.com/story/2007/4/9/1367/60158/Kyle wrote:How many teams have a payroll nearing $100 million?ToughGuy_BlueShirt wrote:How many other teams' fans have this article posted about their owner?Kyle wrote:He dropped to what -- #28?ToughGuy_BlueShirt wrote:I'm starting to get sick of the money issue crap. Baseball isn't cheap, why try to compete if you don't want to pay for anyone? If you get good players, you're going to have to pay them. So you and the Cardinals rather draft mediocre players because they cost less and let the big time prospects go to the teams that will pay for big talent.
How many other teams' fans do you think are playing the "god we're cheap" card?
Edit: and the font thing is a lame fad that I won't take part in.
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2007/w ... index.html
Of course you don't. Because everything is a conspiracy.ToughGuy_BlueShirt wrote:Exactly, it's who you want to believe. I really don't want to believe Dewitt.Kyle wrote:DeWitt says we're closer to $96 million.ToughGuy_BlueShirt wrote:Well, since the Cardinals are at 90 mil, I'm going to take "nearing" from you to mean at least 88 then. And in that case half of the major leagues. 15. http://blog.sportscolumn.com/story/2007/4/9/1367/60158/Kyle wrote:How many teams have a payroll nearing $100 million?ToughGuy_BlueShirt wrote:How many other teams' fans have this article posted about their owner?Kyle wrote:He dropped to what -- #28?ToughGuy_BlueShirt wrote:I'm starting to get sick of the money issue crap. Baseball isn't cheap, why try to compete if you don't want to pay for anyone? If you get good players, you're going to have to pay them. So you and the Cardinals rather draft mediocre players because they cost less and let the big time prospects go to the teams that will pay for big talent.
How many other teams' fans do you think are playing the "god we're cheap" card?
Edit: and the font thing is a lame fad that I won't take part in.
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2007/w ... index.html