GatewayRedbirds.com

A Message Board Dedicated to Discussing St. Louis Cardinals Baseball!
It is currently May 19 13, 11:30 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 105 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: 2012 NFL Offseason
PostPosted: May 14 12, 7:17 pm 
Offline
Hall Of Famer
User avatar

Joined: April 17 06, 11:25 am
Posts: 23534
AdmiralKird wrote:
Popeye_Card wrote:
AdmiralKird wrote:
Yup, latest counter proposal is a sunroof.

Honestly, I don't see how the EJD moves into the top eight stadiums without taking off the roof. It's not grandiose like the Cowboys roofed stadium. There is almost no tailgating space... A roofless EJD is needed to become one of the top stadiums to make up for its downtown deficiencies if you're going to move it that high on the stadium's list.


I don't care if the EJD moves into the top 8. I don't think the city, already struggling financially, can afford to blow significant amounts of money just to keep the Rams in town. If they want to leave that badly, then eff'em.


Is there anyway the State Government can force the counties to merge? This is getting stupid.


That doesn't make the deal any more attractive. That is just too much public money. Eff the NFL.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2012 NFL Offseason
PostPosted: May 14 12, 8:07 pm 
Offline
Perennial All-Star
User avatar

Joined: May 12 06, 7:09 pm
Posts: 5122
Location: 1.2 miles from Busch Stadium
i dont see how a sun roof generates any more money for stan kroenke anyway, so why does he care if there is one or not?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2012 NFL Offseason
PostPosted: May 14 12, 11:11 pm 
Offline
Hall Of Famer
User avatar

Joined: August 5 08, 11:24 am
Posts: 10494
Location: wwtlrd?
If the NFL leaves, you don't have a rooting interest in the NFL anymore and those in Stl don't have to pay for it and presumably there will be more disposable income for the best baseball team evah!! It's a win-win-win really.

_________________
trill wrote:
Yeah, cuz you and Jenny just didn't have it. Me and Jenny. We got it. I can unlock her defense with a well-timed through ball and a towering header.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2012 NFL Offseason
PostPosted: May 14 12, 11:55 pm 
Offline
Hall Of Famer
User avatar

Joined: April 17 06, 11:25 am
Posts: 23534
AWvsCBsteeeerike3 wrote:
If the NFL leaves, you don't have a rooting interest in the NFL anymore and those in Stl don't have to pay for it and presumably there will be more disposable income for the best baseball team evah!! It's a win-win-win really.


You bring up a valid point. The Rams and the NFL leaving StL would likely have a positive effect on the Blues (maybe not so much the Cardinals, who are already top dog). At least some of the advertising and suite money would make its way over. And I'd rather see an empty dome than spend $700MM to fill it 10 times a year.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2012 NFL Offseason
PostPosted: May 15 12, 9:02 am 
Offline
Hall Of Famer
User avatar

Joined: August 5 08, 11:24 am
Posts: 10494
Location: wwtlrd?
Popeye_Card wrote:
AWvsCBsteeeerike3 wrote:
If the NFL leaves, you don't have a rooting interest in the NFL anymore and those in Stl don't have to pay for it and presumably there will be more disposable income for the best baseball team evah!! It's a win-win-win really.


You bring up a valid point. The Rams and the NFL leaving StL would likely have a positive effect on the Blues (maybe not so much the Cardinals, who are already top dog). At least some of the advertising and suite money would make its way over. And I'd rather see an empty dome than spend $700MM to fill it 10 times a year.

Or if the City is dead set on giving away $700M to 'better' the City (what exactly is the argument/debate?), they could go ahead and develop Ballpark Stadium and bring in year round tax revenue, a couple thousand residents and rejuvenate the downtown area. I wouldn't recommend that by any means and I don't know what the Rams are asking for. But, I don't see how spending money on the Rams stadium will bring the City much more money...if that is what the argument is.

_________________
trill wrote:
Yeah, cuz you and Jenny just didn't have it. Me and Jenny. We got it. I can unlock her defense with a well-timed through ball and a towering header.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2012 NFL Offseason
PostPosted: May 15 12, 11:01 am 
Offline
Hall Of Famer
User avatar

Joined: April 17 06, 11:25 am
Posts: 23534
AWvsCBsteeeerike3 wrote:
Popeye_Card wrote:
AWvsCBsteeeerike3 wrote:
If the NFL leaves, you don't have a rooting interest in the NFL anymore and those in Stl don't have to pay for it and presumably there will be more disposable income for the best baseball team evah!! It's a win-win-win really.


You bring up a valid point. The Rams and the NFL leaving StL would likely have a positive effect on the Blues (maybe not so much the Cardinals, who are already top dog). At least some of the advertising and suite money would make its way over. And I'd rather see an empty dome than spend $700MM to fill it 10 times a year.

Or if the City is dead set on giving away $700M to 'better' the City (what exactly is the argument/debate?), they could go ahead and develop Ballpark Stadium and bring in year round tax revenue, a couple thousand residents and rejuvenate the downtown area. I wouldn't recommend that by any means and I don't know what the Rams are asking for. But, I don't see how spending money on the Rams stadium will bring the City much more money...if that is what the argument is.


The Rams have a clause in their lease that they can move if the dome is not a "top 8 stadium" after this season. I have no idea how top 8 is quantified, but by any measure the Dome is firmly entrenched in the bottom 8. So the city/area/state is left with the decision to spend money to spruce up the Dome (or build a new stadium), or take a chance that the Rams leave.

I take the chance that they leave. The dome cost $280MM of mostly public funds to construct in the first place in 1995. Now they're talking of spending an additional $500-$700MM to add a retractable roof and some other snazzy stuff. I don't think having the Rams in town brings that back to the city/state in revenue. Adding the new stuff doesn't help much to attract extra events (Final Four, Super Bowl, conventions). At least not to the point that I'm willing to gamble that much.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2012 NFL Offseason
PostPosted: May 15 12, 11:07 am 
Offline
Hall Of Famer
User avatar

Joined: August 5 08, 11:24 am
Posts: 10494
Location: wwtlrd?
This is a question I honestly don't know the answer to, but much $$ are the Rams worth to the City? In other words, I assume that all the food/beer/merchandise/etc at Rams games brings in revenue that gets taxed. People come to the City to see the Rams play. They rent hotel rooms/eat/drink/gamble/buy gas/etc and all that gets taxed. I don't know about payroll taxes and all that, but I'd imagine the city gets a chunk of payroll as well? So...what is the economic impact of the Rams departing?

_________________
trill wrote:
Yeah, cuz you and Jenny just didn't have it. Me and Jenny. We got it. I can unlock her defense with a well-timed through ball and a towering header.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2012 NFL Offseason
PostPosted: May 15 12, 11:10 am 
Offline
Hall Of Famer
User avatar

Joined: August 5 08, 11:24 am
Posts: 10494
Location: wwtlrd?
BTW, I think Cowboys stadium had a final price of about $1 billion. So....$700M seems insanely high for renovations.

_________________
trill wrote:
Yeah, cuz you and Jenny just didn't have it. Me and Jenny. We got it. I can unlock her defense with a well-timed through ball and a towering header.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2012 NFL Offseason
PostPosted: May 15 12, 11:16 am 
Offline
Hall Of Famer
User avatar

Joined: April 17 06, 11:25 am
Posts: 23534
AWvsCBsteeeerike3 wrote:
This is a question I honestly don't know the answer to, but much $$ are the Rams worth to the City? In other words, I assume that all the food/beer/merchandise/etc at Rams games brings in revenue that gets taxed. People come to the City to see the Rams play. They rent hotel rooms/eat/drink/gamble/buy gas/etc and all that gets taxed. I don't know about payroll taxes and all that, but I'd imagine the city gets a chunk of payroll as well? So...what is the economic impact of the Rams departing?


A complicated question. I believe the Rams have an exemption from the city entertainment tax (as do the Cardinals, the Blues pay in), so their ticket revenue isn't taxed by the city, and I'm not sure how that affects concessions and merchandise sales.

So then you are left with the ~60,000 fans that are downtown 8 times a year, plus a couple preseason games. I'd venture to guess that at least half of those are local (within the city/county), so you probably don't get that much extra boost from them (i.e., they'd be doing something else in the area that day anyway, eating, buying gas, etc.). We're down to the taxes collected from the ~30k remaining--and assuming that they only come for regular season games. Simple math, let's take 30k fans x $150 spent per fan x 8 games per year x 5% collected by local taxes = $1.8MM per year.

To break even on spending $700MM on renovations, you'd have to bring in $35MM in added revenue each year for 20 years (when they'll want another new stadium, if not before then). That's an average of ~$100 per fan. I don't think the impact of each fan is $100 every game.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2012 NFL Offseason
PostPosted: May 15 12, 12:03 pm 
Offline
The Last Word
User avatar

Joined: July 3 06, 2:19 pm
Posts: 7166
Popeye_Card wrote:
To break even on spending $700MM on renovations, you'd have to bring in $35MM in added revenue each year for 20 years (when they'll want another new stadium, if not before then). That's an average of ~$100 per fan. I don't think the impact of each fan is $100 every game.

Don't team employees pay taxes in the city? Wouldn't parking lot income be taxed as well? Do you really think 30k fans live in St. Louis City? I haven't lived there in awhile so I don't know how it works, but if you lived in North/West/South county all that stuff you buy at restaurants and bars downtown goes to the city right? I'm not suggesting it's entirely worth it, but I'd bet the necessary impact is less than $100/game.

_________________
Tambourine Man wrote:
Mitt's a tool used for scooping white balls out of the dirt. A catcher, if you will.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 105 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group