Super Bowl

A forum for non-baseball sports
User avatar
sighyoung
Mayor of GRB
Posts: 37618
Joined: April 17 06, 7:42 pm
Location: Louisville

Re: Super Bowl

Post by sighyoung »

lukethedrifter wrote:
jim wrote:The only fault I can find with Russell WIlson - and it's a BIG one granted - is that he picked the wrong sport.
Well, he's not having sex with gf so there's that.
MrCrowesGarden wrote:I think he's a gigantic phony.
He's cross-dressing and wearing a codpiece?

User avatar
lukethedrifter
darjeeling sipping elite
Posts: 37434
Joined: October 17 06, 11:19 am
Location: Huis Clos

Re: Super Bowl

Post by lukethedrifter »

go birds wrote:lol....relevant:

http://jezebel.com/will-these-two-just- ... 1758757183

I think you can guess what the censored word is
Maybe he and Tebow rub each other off.

User avatar
Jocephus
99% conan clips
Posts: 63645
Joined: April 18 06, 5:14 pm

Re: Super Bowl

Post by Jocephus »


Socnorb11
The Last Word
Posts: 21588
Joined: June 21 06, 8:45 am

Re: Super Bowl

Post by Socnorb11 »

Jocephus wrote:manning involved in another thing

http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/14776 ... nvironment

That's really old news.

User avatar
MrCrowesGarden
'Burb Boy
Posts: 23630
Joined: July 9 06, 11:33 am
Location: Out of the Loop

Re: Super Bowl

Post by MrCrowesGarden »

Socnorb11 wrote:
Jocephus wrote:manning involved in another thing

http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/14776 ... nvironment

That's really old news.
It is, but the coverup and harassment years after the fact is pretty shameful nonetheless.

User avatar
go birds
-go birds
Posts: 31896
Joined: February 5 10, 9:54 am

Re: Super Bowl

Post by go birds »

Ahhh the Shaun King hit piece....go ahead and google shaun king and circle back around

Socnorb11
The Last Word
Posts: 21588
Joined: June 21 06, 8:45 am

Re: Super Bowl

Post by Socnorb11 »

MrCrowesGarden wrote:
Socnorb11 wrote:
Jocephus wrote:manning involved in another thing

http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/14776 ... nvironment

That's really old news.
It is, but the coverup and harassment years after the fact is pretty shameful nonetheless.

I guess I wasn't aware that Manning had harassed her or covered anything up.

User avatar
lukethedrifter
darjeeling sipping elite
Posts: 37434
Joined: October 17 06, 11:19 am
Location: Huis Clos

Re: Super Bowl

Post by lukethedrifter »

go birds wrote:Ahhh the Shaun King hit piece....go ahead and google shaun king and circle back around
Shaun King or not, did Manning stick his ass on her face? then did he violate the agreement by speaking negatively of her? did he lie about her and pass on vicious rumors about her?

Remove Shaun King from this and look at the facts and Manning comes across as a real [expletive]. Or like Clay Travis said, a typical frat boy.

User avatar
MrCrowesGarden
'Burb Boy
Posts: 23630
Joined: July 9 06, 11:33 am
Location: Out of the Loop

Re: Super Bowl

Post by MrCrowesGarden »

Socnorb11 wrote:
MrCrowesGarden wrote:
Socnorb11 wrote:
Jocephus wrote:manning involved in another thing

http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/14776 ... nvironment

That's really old news.
It is, but the coverup and harassment years after the fact is pretty shameful nonetheless.

I guess I wasn't aware that Manning had harassed her or covered anything up.
The nuts and bolts are she and Manning settled, and as part of the settlement, both parties agreed never to speak about it again.

Peyton then wrote a book about what happened, violating the agreement. He also mailed a copy of the book to her new employer and said a bunch of things about her no one backed up. Didn't matter, she still lost her job.

Socnorb11
The Last Word
Posts: 21588
Joined: June 21 06, 8:45 am

Re: Super Bowl

Post by Socnorb11 »

MrCrowesGarden wrote:

The nuts and bolts are she and Manning settled, and as part of the settlement, both parties agreed never to speak about it again.

Peyton then wrote a book about what happened, violating the agreement. He also mailed a copy of the book to her new employer and said a bunch of things about her no one backed up. Didn't matter, she still lost her job.

He actually didn't mention her in the book. She admitted that it was about her.

Regardless, it was a stupid thing to do. It happened 20 years ago. The book was 15 years ago. The lawsuit was 13 years ago. It's all been covered previously. I'm not sure why the smear campaign is re-surfacing.

Post Reply