GatewayRedbirds.com

A Message Board Dedicated to Discussing St. Louis Cardinals Baseball!
It is currently December 10 18, 1:22 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 766 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66 ... 77  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: January 23 18, 10:58 am 
Offline
Seeking a Zubaz seamstress

Joined: September 4 07, 1:48 pm
Posts: 22678
Location: St. Louis
Tim wrote:
So Democrats dislike tariffs now?

Weren't Democrats pushing for Trump to approve steel tariffs?
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/26/busi ... riffs.html

I don't think either party is in favor of free trade anymore.

Not an expert, but steel is a fossil-fuel based commodity - traditionally dumped hear by nations with cheaper labor rules, environmental restrictions*.

seems a lot different than solar panels- sometimes that are more advanced/useful than what are made here.

But other than that, I heed your point.

*I'm not full-on free trade because of this. It's a tricky balancing act, I have no faith in the oligarchy/free markets on their own, and our current govt.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: February 15 18, 8:12 am 
Offline
Hall Of Famer
User avatar

Joined: July 15 08, 8:24 pm
Posts: 18381
Location: Low A Minors
Global Warming Is Getting Worse, Fast
Quote:
Scientists report in the journal Geophysical Research Letters that between 1990 and 2013 the planet’s overall average annual temperature had climbed by 0.9°C. In the three years that followed, it jumped an additional 0.24°C.

The sudden temperature rise was matched by heatwaves, floods, droughts, global coral bleaching and extensive melting of polar ice during those three years.

The cyclic climate phenomenon called El Niño – a dramatic rise in ocean surface temperatures in the eastern Pacific – is in part the cause. But much of the additional warming can be linked to the increase in greenhouse gases in the global atmosphere.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: February 15 18, 8:14 am 
Offline
Hall Of Famer
User avatar

Joined: July 15 08, 8:24 pm
Posts: 18381
Location: Low A Minors
Tim wrote:
So Democrats dislike tariffs now?

Weren't Democrats pushing for Trump to approve steel tariffs?
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/26/busi ... riffs.html

I don't think either party is in favor of free trade anymore.


It's weird. It's almost like Democrats dislike tariffs on things they like, but like tariffs on things they dislike.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: February 15 18, 8:41 am 
Offline
Consider him admonished
User avatar

Joined: March 25 15, 9:59 am
Posts: 7526
Location: Charleston, SC via Arkansas
pioneer98 wrote:
Tim wrote:
So Democrats dislike tariffs now?

Weren't Democrats pushing for Trump to approve steel tariffs?
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/26/busi ... riffs.html

I don't think either party is in favor of free trade anymore.


It's weird. It's almost like Democrats dislike tariffs on things they like, but like tariffs on things they dislike.

That’s not weird. That’s politics.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: February 15 18, 9:49 am 
Offline
Hall Of Famer
User avatar

Joined: July 15 08, 8:24 pm
Posts: 18381
Location: Low A Minors
Tim wrote:
pioneer98 wrote:
Tim wrote:
So Democrats dislike tariffs now?

Weren't Democrats pushing for Trump to approve steel tariffs?
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/26/busi ... riffs.html

I don't think either party is in favor of free trade anymore.


It's weird. It's almost like Democrats dislike tariffs on things they like, but like tariffs on things they dislike.

That’s not weird. That’s politics.


Markets are created and controlled by politics. If you think we should have totally "free" markets with no tariffs or regulations, that is a political position too.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: February 27 18, 8:51 am 
Offline
Hall Of Famer
User avatar

Joined: July 15 08, 8:24 pm
Posts: 18381
Location: Low A Minors

Quote:
The sun won’t rise at the North Pole until March 20, and it’s normally close to the coldest time of year, but an extraordinary and possibly historic thaw swelled over the tip of the planet this weekend. Analyses show that the temperature warmed to the melting point as an enormous storm pumped an intense pulse of heat through the Greenland Sea.

Temperatures may have soared as high as 35 degrees Fahrenheit (2 degrees Celsius) at the pole, according to the U.S. Global Forecast System model. While there are no direct measurements of temperature there, Zack Labe, a climate scientist working on his PhD at the University of California at Irvine, confirmed that several independent analyses showed “it was very close to freezing,” which is more than 50 degrees (30 degrees Celsius) above normal.
Quote:
Scientists were shocked in recent days to discover open water north of Greenland, an area normally covered by old, very thick ice. “This has me more worried than the warm temps in the Arctic right now,” tweeted Mike MacFerrin, an ice sheet specialist at the University of Colorado.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: February 27 18, 11:29 am 
Offline
Perennial All-Star
User avatar

Joined: April 17 06, 5:05 pm
Posts: 6599
Location: Southwestern Illinois
I really wish climate science was easier to explain. News like the article cited above are why schmoes often utter, "What global warming? It's snowing in Rome!!"

The heat at the pole is moving the colder air south, and that's why we're seeing unexpected snow throughout parts of Europe.

Major newspapers (what's a newspaper?) are written at a 6th grade level for a reason, so for as complex as this topic is, I wish they would keep things are simple as possible.

The bottom line is this: It's not supposed to be this warm at the North Pole right now. The fact that it already is does not bode well for the remaining ice up there this summer.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: March 4 18, 8:57 am 
Offline
There's someone in my head but it's not me
User avatar

Joined: April 18 06, 5:08 pm
Posts: 42236
Location: Somewhere back in my long ago


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: March 22 18, 12:12 pm 
Offline
Hall Of Famer
User avatar

Joined: July 15 08, 8:24 pm
Posts: 18381
Location: Low A Minors
FEMA is buying homes in this Alaskan town because climate change
Quote:
VICE News Tonight visited Newtok in October 2017. In just four days, a winter storm tore away 10 feet of the community’s shoreline, bringing the water just a few feet from the nearest home. In Alaska’s coastal villages, erosion of that scale isn’t supposed to happen, but the arctic is warming faster than any other part of the planet.

Much warmer winters mean soils don’t freeze, and easily crumble into the sea. Romy Cadiente, Newtok’s relocation coordinator, said the problem keeps getting worse: “This winter, the water didn’t freeze until the end of January and damage to the shoreline was crazy.”

A full relocation isn’t cheap. Newtok’s move will cost an estimated $130 million, and so far it’s fallen far short of raising enough money. According to Cadiente, these new grants came at the right time: “This actually saved people”, he said to VICE News.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: March 22 18, 12:18 pm 
Offline
Hall Of Famer
User avatar

Joined: October 12 06, 2:21 pm
Posts: 15680
Location: Baseball Ref Bullpen
Tainted water is a very small price to pay for not having a leaderyou can't trust with an email server. Very small.

Radbird wrote:


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 766 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66 ... 77  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Donnie Ebert and 27 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group