GatewayRedbirds.com

A Message Board Dedicated to Discussing St. Louis Cardinals Baseball!
It is currently September 22 19, 9:13 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 36 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: August 18 19, 7:40 pm 
Offline
Hall Of Famer
User avatar

Joined: October 12 06, 2:21 pm
Posts: 16908
Location: Baseball Ref Bullpen
Wish we could ship unemployed Kudlow and Trump there.

What in the world is all this talk about 'looking at' buying Greenland? I mean, really, WTF?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: August 18 19, 7:43 pm 
Online
Everday Unicorn
User avatar

Joined: April 21 06, 10:14 am
Posts: 34787
Location: Austin, TX
We are living in the dumbest timeline.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: August 18 19, 8:21 pm 
Offline
Hall Of Famer

Joined: June 26 06, 8:54 pm
Posts: 11314
Location: kintore/yuendumu



Ideally Williamson gets asked a question about buying Greenland at the next Democratic debate.


Last edited by greenback44 on August 18 19, 8:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: August 18 19, 8:25 pm 
Offline
Seeking a Zubaz seamstress

Joined: September 4 07, 1:48 pm
Posts: 24293
Location: St. Louis
Once again- Could you imagine if Clinton or Obama proposed something like this?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: August 18 19, 8:38 pm 
Offline
GRB's most intelligent & humble poster
User avatar

Joined: April 17 06, 11:25 am
Posts: 27129
As dumb as it sounds, it actually isn’t that crazy. Other than Denmark won’t sell it. Greenland is thought to be extremely rich in natural resources, and thanks to climate change, they are becoming accessible.

I mean, it is perverted. We only want it now that we burned enough resources to expose it. But it at least makes some sense.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: August 18 19, 8:38 pm 
Offline
There's someone in my head but it's not me
User avatar

Joined: April 18 06, 5:08 pm
Posts: 43897
Location: Clowns to the left of me. Jokers to the right. Here I am.
Freed Roger wrote:
Once again- Could you imagine if Clinton or Obama proposed something like this?

Don’t limit it to just Dems. I can’t imagine any past president doing 90% of the [expletive] that’s going on today.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: August 18 19, 8:53 pm 
Offline
Seeking a Zubaz seamstress

Joined: September 4 07, 1:48 pm
Posts: 24293
Location: St. Louis
Popeye_Card wrote:
As dumb as it sounds, it actually isn’t that crazy. Other than Denmark won’t sell it. Greenland is thought to be extremely rich in natural resources, and thanks to climate change, they are becoming accessible.
mean, it is perverted. We only want it now that we burned enough resources to expose it. But it at least makes some sense.


I'd rather buy Antartica, Patagonia. Or Canada while we are at it. ....

....I know what your saying Popeye about Greenland, but again, worth saying:
It's just absurd, the GOP giving King powers to a bankrupt loser. Since he is king, we get to debate things like a useless The Wall, and buying countries that can't be bought.

And frankly. I wouldn't trust the United States of America, under the current admin as a steward of the resources of Greenland. [expletive], I don't trust them with existing USA.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: August 18 19, 9:59 pm 
Offline
Has an anecdote about a townie he overheard.
User avatar

Joined: December 6 10, 1:09 am
Posts: 11479
Location: Illinois
Popeye_Card wrote:
As dumb as it sounds, it actually isn’t that crazy. Other than Denmark won’t sell it. Greenland is thought to be extremely rich in natural resources, and thanks to climate change, they are becoming accessible.

I mean, it is perverted. We only want it now that we burned enough resources to expose it. But it at least makes some sense.



You aren't wrong. But man it would be catastrophic to the world if we bought Greenland.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: August 19 19, 7:24 am 
Offline
Hall Of Famer
User avatar

Joined: July 15 08, 8:24 pm
Posts: 19778
Location: Low A Minors
How much would it cost? Why do we have this insanely massive military if we're just going to try to buy land. Why not just take it by force like we did so many other places?

This is a really hard idea to get inside my head. Large scale resource extraction from Greenland would be the final nail in the coffin for coastal cities around the world, if we already haven't passed that point. I would hope there would be massive protests but so far none of those have been able to stop any of these kind of things (for example: DAPL). It's going to take protests the level of Puerto Rico or Hong Kong to stop things like this and even then it may not be enough.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: August 19 19, 7:42 am 
Offline
GRB's most intelligent & humble poster
User avatar

Joined: April 17 06, 11:25 am
Posts: 27129
pioneer98 wrote:
This is a really hard idea to get inside my head. Large scale resource extraction from Greenland would be the final nail in the coffin for coastal cities around the world, if we already haven't passed that point. I would hope there would be massive protests but so far none of those have been able to stop any of these kind of things (for example: DAPL). It's going to take protests the level of Puerto Rico or Hong Kong to stop things like this and even then it may not be enough.


For clarification, hydrocarbons are only a small portion of the valuable resources expected to be found in Greenland. There are abundant gemstones and precious metal deposits including uranium. Denmark is assumed to be a safe world player, but a portion of the argument to purchase control of Greenland would be to play defense.

As for hydrocarbon extraction, it wouldn't be a final nail in any fashion. Hydrocarbon resources are abundantly available in other parts of the world, can be extracted much easier, and already have plenty of global climate destructing power. Protests also won't change squat. I think both sides--left and right--need to educate themselves on the global energy market, and figure out how we are going to be able to meet the energy demands of 8+ billion people across the globe without destroying the planet in the process. The solutions are far, far more complex than curtailing fossil fuel use.



(Note: In case it is unclear, I'm not an advocate for buying Greenland. Just attempting to provide the logic behind it. In the universe of bat-guano-crazy Trump administration ideas, this one actually makes some sense.)


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 36 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group