One Player - Singular or Plural?

Chat about non-baseball topics. No political discussions!

What is it?

Red Sox
5
42%
Red Sock
7
58%
 
Total votes: 12

User avatar
Jmodene
Still waiting for someone to use a Weird Al song
Posts: 15535
Joined: April 18 06, 5:54 pm
Location: Las Vegas, NV

Re: One Player - Singular or Plural?

Post by Jmodene »

Phyrkrakr wrote:[
That's too close to Cincinnati for me, who were originally the "Red Legs".
Actually, no - they were originally the Red Stockings (1869), and then the Reds. They didn't become the Red Legs (or Redlegs) until the 1950's, when "Reds" was a dirty word (thanks to Joe McCarthy). I think they changed it back around 1959 or 1960.

Other teams that changed their name without changing their city: The Phillies played as the Philadelphia Bluejays (one word) for a few years in the 1940's. The Boston Braves were the Boston Bees in the 1930's. And the Houston Astros were, before they moved into the Astrodome in 1965, the Houston Colt .45's (they dropped the .45's after the first year, although I think not officially, and were just known as the Houston Colts in 1963 and 1964).

Of course, if you wanna go back to the 19th century, there's a plethora of names - the Cardinals were previously the Browns, the Maroons, and the Perfectos (not necessarily in that order) before becoming the Cardinals. The Dodgers were the Trolley Dodgers and the Bridegrooms. The Red Sox were the Beaneaters. The Cubs were the White Stockings, the Colts, and the Orphans.

And, lapsing into the 20th century, the Cleveland Indians were, for a short time, known as the Cleveland Naps - making them the only team ever to be named for one of their players - Nap Lajoie. It'd be like the Cardinals suddenly calling themselves the "St. Louis Alberts".

User avatar
Jmodene
Still waiting for someone to use a Weird Al song
Posts: 15535
Joined: April 18 06, 5:54 pm
Location: Las Vegas, NV

Re: One Player - Singular or Plural?

Post by Jmodene »

BTW, in the RBI vs. RBIs debate:

RBI is both singular and plural. It stands for "Runs Batted In" but can also be used in the singular, as in "Molina had one Run Batted In tonight." And you can use the singular as a collective, rather than using the plural version.

Thus, it's proper to say either "Yadier Molina had one RBI (Run Batted In) tonight and now has 130 RBIs (RBIs being the collective of several individual RBI) on the season" or "Yadier Molina had one RBI tonight and how has 130 RBI (Runs Batted In) on the season."

Well, it would be proper if Yadier Molina could ever drive in 130 runs in one season. ;)

BTW, did you know that "Baseball" was originally (until about 1940) two words: "Base Ball".

User avatar
vinsanity
Chili dog truther
Posts: 8772
Joined: July 3 06, 2:19 pm
Location: Indianapolis

Re: One Player - Singular or Plural?

Post by vinsanity »

jagtrader wrote:An RBI is considered a unit rather than an acronym. That's why AP style is RBIs. (no apostrophe)
There it is! That's what I was getting at.

Post Reply