GatewayRedbirds.com

A Message Board Dedicated to Discussing St. Louis Cardinals Baseball!
It is currently May 26 13, 1:10 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 57 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Electoral college
PostPosted: February 1 08, 9:09 am 
Offline
Red Lobster for the seafood lover in you

Joined: May 1 06, 2:41 pm
Posts: 37920
Location: You can find me in the tub, bottle full of bub
I think the electoral college is as relevant and important today as ever. I might be in the minority, but I would be scared if it went away.

_________________
"Boy, that was exciting. I always say it ain't over til it's over, but that one should've been over a while ago." ~ Yogi Berra


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Electoral college
PostPosted: February 1 08, 9:12 am 
Offline
Hall Of Famer
User avatar

Joined: April 17 06, 11:25 am
Posts: 23545
jim wrote:
I think the electoral college is as relevant and important today as ever. I might be in the minority, but I would be scared if it went away.


I don't mind it, but I think it needs to be tweaked.

i.e., States still get electoral votes, but they should be split within a state. So if Florida has 27 electoral votes (or whatever they have), and Bush gets 51% and Gore gets 49%, then Bush should get 14 to Gore's 13, instead of Bush getting all 27. If a candidate gets 75% of a state, he should get 75% of the electoral votes.

A couple states already do this (I think Colorado is one). I think it's more "democratic" if they all did.

_________________
jim wrote:
I'm not humping anything.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Electoral college
PostPosted: February 1 08, 9:17 am 
Offline
Perennial All-Star
User avatar

Joined: July 26 06, 9:51 am
Posts: 3451
Location: Searching for the perfect microbrew
Popeye_Card wrote:
jim wrote:
I think the electoral college is as relevant and important today as ever. I might be in the minority, but I would be scared if it went away.


I don't mind it, but I think it needs to be tweaked.

i.e., States still get electoral votes, but they should be split within a state. So if Florida has 27 electoral votes (or whatever they have), and Bush gets 51% and Gore gets 49%, then Bush should get 14 to Gore's 13, instead of Bush getting all 27. If a candidate gets 75% of a state, he should get 75% of the electoral votes.

A couple states already do this (I think Colorado is one). I think it's more "democratic" if they all did.


Go by congressional district. At this point, the Dems might freak out about that because it puts several electoral votes in Illinois (for example) in play for the Republicans.

_________________
"Give me the errors of enthusiasm!"
--Casey Stengel


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Electoral college
PostPosted: February 1 08, 9:22 am 
Offline
a bad penny always turns up
User avatar

Joined: April 17 06, 12:27 pm
Posts: 22078
Location: Hanging out with my redneck, white socks and Blue Ribbon beer.
I couldn't get in.

_________________
Image
Catch my drift? Or am I being obtuse?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Electoral college
PostPosted: February 1 08, 9:23 am 
Offline
Mayor of GRB
User avatar

Joined: April 17 06, 7:42 pm
Posts: 18367
Location: Louisville
Leroy wrote:
I couldn't get in.


You need a pulse.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Electoral college
PostPosted: February 1 08, 9:28 am 
Offline
All-Star
User avatar

Joined: July 25 06, 12:58 pm
Posts: 1787
Location: Austin, TX
Popeye_Card wrote:
jim wrote:
I think the electoral college is as relevant and important today as ever. I might be in the minority, but I would be scared if it went away.


I don't mind it, but I think it needs to be tweaked.

i.e., States still get electoral votes, but they should be split within a state. So if Florida has 27 electoral votes (or whatever they have), and Bush gets 51% and Gore gets 49%, then Bush should get 14 to Gore's 13, instead of Bush getting all 27. If a candidate gets 75% of a state, he should get 75% of the electoral votes.

A couple states already do this (I think Colorado is one). I think it's more "democratic" if they all did.


Perfectly makes sense.
Going one step further to what Popeye just said...let's say if a state has 20 votes, there should be 20 electoral locations. Winner takes the location & it adds up nation wide.
Lets say in SC where there is majority African American population, there could still be pockets which could vote the other way & if they fall/sway into a common electoral location, the equation could change. In most cases, the race is very close & this could be very decisive.

_________________
"The two most important things in life: good friends and a strong bullpen." - Bob Gibson


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Electoral college
PostPosted: February 1 08, 9:28 am 
Offline
Official GRB Sponsor of Larry Bigbie
User avatar

Joined: April 17 06, 9:16 pm
Posts: 20387
Location: No. 16 on the Cards Top 15 Prospect List
I'm a fan. I would like to see more power given back to the states and less federal control over a lot of things.

_________________
greenback wrote:
Q: What year is it?
A: Ty Wigginton


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Electoral college
PostPosted: February 1 08, 9:34 am 
Offline
Hall Of Famer
User avatar

Joined: April 17 06, 11:25 am
Posts: 23545
Radio_Bugtussle wrote:
Popeye_Card wrote:
jim wrote:
I think the electoral college is as relevant and important today as ever. I might be in the minority, but I would be scared if it went away.


I don't mind it, but I think it needs to be tweaked.

i.e., States still get electoral votes, but they should be split within a state. So if Florida has 27 electoral votes (or whatever they have), and Bush gets 51% and Gore gets 49%, then Bush should get 14 to Gore's 13, instead of Bush getting all 27. If a candidate gets 75% of a state, he should get 75% of the electoral votes.

A couple states already do this (I think Colorado is one). I think it's more "democratic" if they all did.


Go by congressional district. At this point, the Dems might freak out about that because it puts several electoral votes in Illinois (for example) in play for the Republicans.


I'd be fine with that. It more closely resembles a "popular vote".

I just don't like that somebody can win California by a few percentage points, but that's a HUGE swing in electoral votes. Or the case we had in Florida in 2000.

_________________
jim wrote:
I'm not humping anything.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Electoral college
PostPosted: February 1 08, 9:36 am 
Offline
Red Lobster for the seafood lover in you

Joined: May 1 06, 2:41 pm
Posts: 37920
Location: You can find me in the tub, bottle full of bub
Popeye_Card wrote:
Radio_Bugtussle wrote:
Popeye_Card wrote:
jim wrote:
I think the electoral college is as relevant and important today as ever. I might be in the minority, but I would be scared if it went away.


I don't mind it, but I think it needs to be tweaked.

i.e., States still get electoral votes, but they should be split within a state. So if Florida has 27 electoral votes (or whatever they have), and Bush gets 51% and Gore gets 49%, then Bush should get 14 to Gore's 13, instead of Bush getting all 27. If a candidate gets 75% of a state, he should get 75% of the electoral votes.

A couple states already do this (I think Colorado is one). I think it's more "democratic" if they all did.


Go by congressional district. At this point, the Dems might freak out about that because it puts several electoral votes in Illinois (for example) in play for the Republicans.


I'd be fine with that. It more closely resembles a "popular vote".

I just don't like that somebody can win California by a few percentage points, but that's a HUGE swing in electoral votes. Or the case we had in Florida in 2000.


Kind of defeats the purpose of it.

_________________
"Boy, that was exciting. I always say it ain't over til it's over, but that one should've been over a while ago." ~ Yogi Berra


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Electoral college
PostPosted: February 1 08, 9:41 am 
Offline
Hall Of Famer
User avatar

Joined: April 17 06, 11:25 am
Posts: 23545
jim wrote:

Kind of defeats the purpose of it.


Sort-of. There's still larger swings than a straight popular vote. 1 percentage point difference could mean 1 extra electoral vote from that state--and if a state only has 5 votes, winning 3-2 is a pretty nice swing.

I personally think it's the best way. The electoral college as currently constructed, I don't really care for. I don't think it accurately represents the nation's interests--more the interests of the slight majority in the most populous states. I know that it generally follows the popular vote, but I still don't care for it.

_________________
jim wrote:
I'm not humping anything.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 57 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: MSN [Bot] and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group