GatewayRedbirds.com

A Message Board Dedicated to Discussing St. Louis Cardinals Baseball!
It is currently January 25 20, 3:19 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 363 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 37  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Orlando shooting
PostPosted: June 14 16, 3:06 pm 
Offline
There's someone in my head but it's not me
User avatar

Joined: April 18 06, 5:08 pm
Posts: 44461
Location: Clowns to the left of me. Jokers to the right. Here I am.
Without religion there would be no St. Louis.

I would miss St. Louis.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Orlando shooting
PostPosted: June 14 16, 3:06 pm 
Offline
Hall Of Famer
User avatar

Joined: July 15 08, 8:24 pm
Posts: 20498
Location: Low A Minors
If Obama just used the right words to describe terrorists, this war would already be over. They'd be like "What did he just call us? Wow....That's it, tell them they can have back Iraq."

Can't recall if I posted this in the locked thread or not but of the 25 deadliest mass shootings in the US, almost none happened when assault weapons were banned from 1994 to 2004. Orlando being at the top.



Last edited by pioneer98 on June 14 16, 3:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Orlando shooting
PostPosted: June 14 16, 3:06 pm 
Offline
just can't quit you.
User avatar

Joined: April 18 06, 4:33 pm
Posts: 24883
Location: Lost
GeddyWrox wrote:
jim wrote:
I'm sure that mankind would be better off without religion. The god's that have been invented have wreaked havoc on the world. Maybe we would fight over something else, probably would I suppose. But I can't help but wonder if we might just fight less if human beings weren't so damn superstitious.

YES. Totally agree.



Yea, we don't need this...

John 13:34-35New International Version (NIV)

34 “A new command I give you: Love one another. As I have loved you, so you must love one another. 35 By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you love one another.”

Or this:

Matthew 22:37-39 “Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.’ This is the first and greatest commandment. And the second is like it: ‘Love your neighbor as yourself.”

or this:

Romans 12:10 “Be devoted to one another in love. Honor one another above yourselves.”

or this:

Matthew 5:44-45 “But I tell you, love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, that you may be children of your Father in heaven. He causes his sun to rise on the evil and the good, and sends rain on the righteous and the unrighteous.”

this too:

Romans 12:8 “Let no debt remain outstanding, except the continuing debt to love one another, for whoever loves others has fulfilled the law.”

There are good and bad in all religions. I choose to follow the good teachings.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Orlando shooting
PostPosted: June 14 16, 3:08 pm 
Offline
Hall Of Famer
User avatar

Joined: May 4 06, 8:44 am
Posts: 16921
pioneer98 wrote:
If Obama just used the right words to describe terrorists, this war would already be over. They'd be like "What did he just call us? Wow....That's it, tell them they can have back Iraq."

Can't recall if I posted this in the locked thread or not but of the 25 deadliest mass shootings in the US, almost none happened when assault weapons were banned from 1994 to 2004. Orlando being at the top.



as pointed out before, all except Columbine


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Orlando shooting
PostPosted: June 14 16, 3:13 pm 
Online
darjeeling sipping elite
User avatar

Joined: October 17 06, 11:19 am
Posts: 37333
Location: Huis Clos
As I've heard repeatedly from the gun fetishists AN AR15 ISNT AN ASSAULT WEAPON. PLUS FREEDOM. AND FUN.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Orlando shooting
PostPosted: June 14 16, 3:14 pm 
Offline
'Burb Boy
User avatar

Joined: July 9 06, 11:33 am
Posts: 19674
Location: Out of the Loop
cardinalkarp wrote:
pioneer98 wrote:
If Obama just used the right words to describe terrorists, this war would already be over. They'd be like "What did he just call us? Wow....That's it, tell them they can have back Iraq."

Can't recall if I posted this in the locked thread or not but of the 25 deadliest mass shootings in the US, almost none happened when assault weapons were banned from 1994 to 2004. Orlando being at the top.



as pointed out before, all except Columbine


Two others happened in 1999, but that seems to be the outlier year. No other year from 94-2004 had a single one in the top 25.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Orlando shooting
PostPosted: June 14 16, 3:15 pm 
Offline
Hall Of Famer
User avatar

Joined: July 15 08, 8:24 pm
Posts: 20498
Location: Low A Minors
jim wrote:
Something really irritates me that they keep using the term ISIL. There is some bull [expletive] going on with that. Can't put my finger on it.


http://www.theatlantic.com/news/archive ... urce=atltw
Quote:
Obama argues that to place the actions of the Islamic State and other religious extremist groups in the context of Islam would provide those groups with legitimacy. He says the use of “radical Islam” frames the fight against ISIS as a war between the West and Islam, and risks alienating both Muslim Americans and Muslim nations considered allies. Obama doesn’t call ISIS by the name it prefers, instead using the acronym ISIL. “ISIL is not Islamic, and ISIL is certainly not a state,” he said in 2014.

Obama reiterated this rationale in his speech Tuesday. Groups like ISIS and al-Qaeda “want us to validate them by implying that they speak for those billion-plus people, that that they speak for Islam,” he said. “If we fall into the trap of painting all Muslims with a broad brush and imply that we are at war with an entire religion, then we are doing the terrorists’ work for them.”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Orlando shooting
PostPosted: June 14 16, 3:16 pm 
Offline
just can't quit you.
User avatar

Joined: April 18 06, 4:33 pm
Posts: 24883
Location: Lost
Recreational drugs have been illegal for a long time- people still get them. How can we make a ban on guns more effective than the war on drugs?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Orlando shooting
PostPosted: June 14 16, 3:21 pm 
Offline
Red Lobster for the seafood lover in you

Joined: May 1 06, 2:41 pm
Posts: 50681
pioneer98 wrote:
jim wrote:
Something really irritates me that they keep using the term ISIL. There is some bull [expletive] going on with that. Can't put my finger on it.


http://www.theatlantic.com/news/archive ... urce=atltw
Quote:
Obama argues that to place the actions of the Islamic State and other religious extremist groups in the context of Islam would provide those groups with legitimacy. He says the use of “radical Islam” frames the fight against ISIS as a war between the West and Islam, and risks alienating both Muslim Americans and Muslim nations considered allies. Obama doesn’t call ISIS by the name it prefers, instead using the acronym ISIL. “ISIL is not Islamic, and ISIL is certainly not a state,” he said in 2014.

Obama reiterated this rationale in his speech Tuesday. Groups like ISIS and al-Qaeda “want us to validate them by implying that they speak for those billion-plus people, that that they speak for Islam,” he said. “If we fall into the trap of painting all Muslims with a broad brush and imply that we are at war with an entire religion, then we are doing the terrorists’ work for them.”


Well his campaign has failed miserably because everyone except him uses ISIS, which is about par for the course apparently with his ability to persuade.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Orlando shooting
PostPosted: June 14 16, 3:42 pm 
Offline
Perennial All-Star
User avatar

Joined: April 20 06, 8:43 pm
Posts: 8797
Location: Please use blue font for the sarcasm impaired.
jim wrote:
pioneer98 wrote:
jim wrote:
Something really irritates me that they keep using the term ISIL. There is some bull [expletive] going on with that. Can't put my finger on it.


http://www.theatlantic.com/news/archive ... urce=atltw
Quote:
Obama argues that to place the actions of the Islamic State and other religious extremist groups in the context of Islam would provide those groups with legitimacy. He says the use of “radical Islam” frames the fight against ISIS as a war between the West and Islam, and risks alienating both Muslim Americans and Muslim nations considered allies. Obama doesn’t call ISIS by the name it prefers, instead using the acronym ISIL. “ISIL is not Islamic, and ISIL is certainly not a state,” he said in 2014.

Obama reiterated this rationale in his speech Tuesday. Groups like ISIS and al-Qaeda “want us to validate them by implying that they speak for those billion-plus people, that that they speak for Islam,” he said. “If we fall into the trap of painting all Muslims with a broad brush and imply that we are at war with an entire religion, then we are doing the terrorists’ work for them.”


Well his campaign has failed miserably because everyone except him uses ISIS, which is about par for the course apparently with his ability to persuade.

And how would it go over (especially in the Fox News circles) if Obama had the ability to "persuade" journalists to always use a certain term for something?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 363 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 37  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: lukethedrifter, Smith Corks One and 9 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group