Fat Strat wrote:
Not to be rude, Fat, but everyone who wants to comment on this case must read the grand jury report to be fully informed.
That attitude, which we've seen several times in this thread, is rude and completely unnecessary since we're on an internet discussion forum
. Doc made a quick posting of the transcript to help address my question -- question, not comment. That, I appreciate.
That's fine if you feel that way, and is why I prefaced my comment with "not to be rude", but to me, discussing this without reading the transcript is like discussing search and seizure without reading the Fourth Amendment. I strongly encourage all to read it so that they are fully informed. That's all I'm saying.
Yes. This isn't a trivial discussion. Have the respect for the subject to educate yourself before forming an opinion and have the courtesy for your fellow posters to do a quick, three second google search of "Sandusky Grand Jury Report" rather than relying on them to educate you. It's not hard, it is actually quicker and you won't get posts directed at you that start with "Hey, not to be rude" or "Not to be a dick, but..."
Btw, to be clear, unless you're riding a horse in a thunder shower and there's a kid in your vicinity, there is no such thing as "just horsing around with a kid in a shower."