GatewayRedbirds.com

A Message Board Dedicated to Discussing St. Louis Cardinals Baseball!
It is currently May 21 13, 2:18 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 73 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: November 15 11, 11:50 am 
Offline
is unaware that dangerous is the real Tyler Durden
User avatar

Joined: June 10 09, 11:31 pm
Posts: 10774
Location: 1 block from In-N-Out
I'd feel better if ghostrunner had moved it.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: November 15 11, 11:51 am 
Offline
The Last Word
User avatar

Joined: July 3 06, 2:19 pm
Posts: 7166
slide_into_first wrote:
I'd feel better if ghostrunner had moved it.

How do we know he didn't? Maybe thrill just split it.

_________________
Tambourine Man wrote:
Mitt's a tool used for scooping white balls out of the dirt. A catcher, if you will.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: November 15 11, 11:55 am 
Offline
Perennial All-Star
User avatar

Joined: August 30 07, 12:28 pm
Posts: 8838
thrill wrote:
vinsanity wrote:
No where in the report does it say "McQueary saw what was happened and turned around unnoticed and let it continue."

This is a good example of why I and others have asked people to know the facts before commenting. From page 7 of the grand jury report:
Warning - Graphic description of alleged rape of a child within the spoiler.
Spoiler: show
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/sports/documents/sandusky-grand-jury-report11052011.html
Quote:
The graduate assistant was shocked but noticed that both
Victim 2 and Sandusky saw him. The graduate assistant left immediately, distraught.

I'm sorry, but that is a sworn statement that doesn't leave much room to interpretation. Nowhere does it say he intervened.

It leaves open a lot of room for interpretation. It absolutely amazes me that the assumption that so many people here come to is that the act continued when Sandusky was caught.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: November 15 11, 11:55 am 
Online
bronoun enthusiast
User avatar

Joined: April 14 06, 10:45 pm
Posts: 22933
Location: el mirage
Read the grand jury report after this all goes to trial (you'll find I was the one that split & moved it).

_________________
"If it was anyone but Carp, I would have said, 'No,'" Matheny said. "Anyone but Carp."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: November 15 11, 11:57 am 
Online
bronoun enthusiast
User avatar

Joined: April 14 06, 10:45 pm
Posts: 22933
Location: el mirage
cpebbles wrote:
thrill wrote:
vinsanity wrote:
No where in the report does it say "McQueary saw what was happened and turned around unnoticed and let it continue."

This is a good example of why I and others have asked people to know the facts before commenting. From page 7 of the grand jury report:
Warning - Graphic description of alleged rape of a child within the spoiler.
Spoiler: show
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/sports/documents/sandusky-grand-jury-report11052011.html
Quote:
The graduate assistant was shocked but noticed that both
Victim 2 and Sandusky saw him. The graduate assistant left immediately, distraught.

I'm sorry, but that is a sworn statement that doesn't leave much room to interpretation. Nowhere does it say he intervened.

It leaves open a lot of room for interpretation. It absolutely amazes me that the assumption that so many people here come to is that the act continued when Sandusky was caught.

Who thinks that? No one thinks that. I assume it stopped (as I clearly said in the thread). I just don't think it's clear whether McQueary's role was active or passive in making it stop. Again, what is clear is that McQueary did not go to the police afterward. He also shared access to the PSU facilities with Sandusky after the incident. That doesn't and shouldn't sit well with anyone who reads it.

_________________
"If it was anyone but Carp, I would have said, 'No,'" Matheny said. "Anyone but Carp."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: November 15 11, 11:59 am 
Offline
The Last Word
User avatar

Joined: July 3 06, 2:19 pm
Posts: 7166
thrill wrote:
Who thinks that? No one thinks that. I assume it stopped (as I clearly said in the thread). I just don't think it's clear whether McQueary's role was active or passive in making it stop.

My issue was with the suggestion that McQueary did something wrong because he 'left the boy in harm's way' (and that asking for clarification whether or not we know either for certain was unjustified). I don't feel comfortable persecuting the guy on that end until the whole story comes out.

His complacency with Sandusky on campus for another 7 years is another matter.

_________________
Tambourine Man wrote:
Mitt's a tool used for scooping white balls out of the dirt. A catcher, if you will.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: November 15 11, 12:03 pm 
Offline
Perennial All-Star
User avatar

Joined: August 30 07, 12:28 pm
Posts: 8838
thrill wrote:
cpebbles wrote:
It leaves open a lot of room for interpretation. It absolutely amazes me that the assumption that so many people here come to is that the act continued when Sandusky was caught.

Who thinks that? No one thinks that. I assume it stopped (as I clearly said in the thread). I just don't think it's clear whether McQueary's role was active or passive in making it stop. Again, what is clear is that McQueary did not go to the police afterward. He also shared access to the PSU facilities with Sandusky after the incident. That doesn't and shouldn't sit well with anyone who reads it.

This entire sideline in the thread arose from people expressing disgust that McQueary allowed the act to continue. I personally don't think any less of a guy for not going and punching Sandusky, or whatever people wanted him to "actively" do to stop the rape, I just care that it was stopped.

Should he have called the police? Clearly. Should he have separated the kid from Sandusky? Sure, but people almost never function well in traumatic situations.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: November 15 11, 12:07 pm 
Online
bronoun enthusiast
User avatar

Joined: April 14 06, 10:45 pm
Posts: 22933
Location: el mirage
I thought the disagreement in that thread was whether or not it's rude to impatiently ask people to read the grand jury report rather than posting things like "maybe there's some relevant info in that report I didn't read but I haven't read it and here's my opinion."?

Internet tough guy syndrome has ran rampant during this case. We all want to think we'd rush into that shower, headbutt the naked rapist, pick him up over our heads and jack-knife power bomb him onto the tile, but most of us would probably stand there in shock.

_________________
"If it was anyone but Carp, I would have said, 'No,'" Matheny said. "Anyone but Carp."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: November 15 11, 12:21 pm 
Offline
Hall Of Famer
User avatar

Joined: November 9 06, 6:45 am
Posts: 16004
Location: beachwalking with models
I don't know if this has to do with my comment, but complicit means unreported.

_________________
abstract backpack vegan skateboards, etc


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: November 15 11, 12:38 pm 
Offline
Perennial All-Star
User avatar

Joined: April 17 06, 7:36 pm
Posts: 7827
Location: making a decent penny in boiled denims
holy crap. all I said was everyone should read the grand jury report to be fully informed. I wasn't being short or dismissive. I certainly wasn't suggesting that people shouldn't post in the thread. If that's the conclusion someone drew - well, than I don't know what else to say.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 73 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group