wart57 wrote:
heyzeus wrote:
I would never have voted for this idiot anyway, but if I was even on the fence, this would have put me over it.
This whole [expletive] idea that sex is dirty and bad is what, imo, causes more problems than watching porn could ever do.
To be fair, you're not going to find hardly anyone that thinks sex is dirty and bad. You will find folks, myself included, who think that it should be limited to a monogamous married relationship. We could argue that point all day and come to no conclusion, as arguments over issues of morality often turn out. However, I think you can make an argument over harmful effects of pornography, i.e. objectifying women or damaging intimacy.
Now, legislating it is another and more difficult issue, and I would rather rely on changing men's hearts than trying to impose the law. I do wish it were not so easily available to children. I know going 50 years back we all found our way to a playboy magazine somehow, but everything is so easily available up to extreme hardcore. I'm pretty sure there's no putting that genie back in the bottle though.
_________________
For I am but a simple caveman. I can't understand your fancy modern posts about sabermetrics. I just know that the cardinals rule all.
jim wrote:
The important thing is we will have a better pythagorean record if we can hold on.
Login
Register
FAQ
