thrill wrote:
Kyle wrote:
To condescendingly dismiss questions with responses like "you don't deserve to ask questions or voice an opinion [if you haven't read the grand jury report]" is pretentious and obnoxious, and is unreasonable under any circumstances.
It's perfectly reasonable to tell someone the conclusion they are drawing without all of the relevant information is invalid.
Relevant quote:
Quote:
Not arguing with you, but do we actually know that he didn't? There wasn't any mention that he did in the original reports I read. But, there wasn't any mention that he DIDN'T either.
He asked if new information had been brought to light (by the grand jury report) that suggested concrete evidence that McQueary left without stopping the incident. It seemed to be a small misunderstanding of accusing him of not stopping the immediate act vs being complicit with the cover up.
It was suggested Fat was out of line to ask that question without reading the Grand Jury report. People ask similar questions all the time without judgement and some didn't feel the criticism was necessary. People ask 'What SS FA's are there?' or 'Should I get an iPhone or Kindle Fire' all the time (sorry Swirls) with out criticism and some felt this instance was being unfairly singled out.
_________________
Tambourine Man wrote:
Mitt's a tool used for scooping white balls out of the dirt. A catcher, if you will.
Login
Register
FAQ
