Rant: Farmers

The forum for ranting, raving, complaining and praising
User avatar
lukethedrifter
darjeeling sipping elite
Posts: 37257
Joined: October 17 06, 11:19 am
Location: Huis Clos

Re: Rant: Farmers

Post by lukethedrifter »

cpebbles wrote:
TimeForGuinness wrote:I'm lost on why this is a rant
Because thunderstorms suck for everyone except those smug goddamn farmers.
I love thunderstorms. Except when they ruin my day at work.

AWvsCBsteeeerike3
"I could totally eat a pig butt, if smoked correctly!"
Posts: 27537
Joined: August 5 08, 11:24 am
Location: Thinking of the Children

Re: Rant: Farmers

Post by AWvsCBsteeeerike3 »

I was under the impression that farm insurance was pretty much just to cover your losses if [expletive] hit the fan. And, it is a case by case scenario. So, if you normally produce $1M in corn, need $800K to break even and produce $600K worth of corn this year, you'd call up the insurance man and he'd come out, assess the situation and give you about $200K.....and they certainly wouldn't give someone that produced $1M in the above scenario any money.....

Please correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think farmers making record profits are raking in insurance money on top of it.

User avatar
Maclowery
Child Pot Activist
Posts: 7742
Joined: June 15 06, 7:27 am
Location: NYC

Re: Rant: Farmers

Post by Maclowery »

This topic is too heavy. We need another Rave re: Farmgirls.

Sorry, farmers, but your poor daughters are desperate to get out and make a lot of poor decisions. And my overlong years in Iowa thank you for that.

User avatar
Hudler
All-Star
Posts: 2293
Joined: September 13 06, 12:02 am
Location: Fulton,MO

Re: Rant: Farmers

Post by Hudler »

Maclowery wrote:This topic is too heavy. We need another Rave re: Farmgirls.

Sorry, farmers, but your poor daughters are desperate to get out and make a lot of poor decisions. And my overlong years in Iowa thank you for that.
Image

User avatar
IMADreamer
Has an anecdote about a townie he overheard.
Posts: 12872
Joined: December 6 10, 1:09 am
Location: Illinois

Re: Rant: Farmers

Post by IMADreamer »

AWvsCBsteeeerike3 wrote:I was under the impression that farm insurance was pretty much just to cover your losses if [expletive] hit the fan. And, it is a case by case scenario. So, if you normally produce $1M in corn, need $800K to break even and produce $600K worth of corn this year, you'd call up the insurance man and he'd come out, assess the situation and give you about $200K.....and they certainly wouldn't give someone that produced $1M in the above scenario any money.....

Please correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think farmers making record profits are raking in insurance money on top of it.
It works like your home insurance or car insurance. If you've had something, droughts, hail, wind, etc to damage your corn you call up the insurance company and they send someone out to walk your fields, take measurements and counts to figure out how much damage you've had. They then pay you the difference between that damage and the crop you would have had if it wasn't damage.

As I've said before it's basically so you can break even and start over next year. No one who is taking crop insurance claims is getting rich. Yes the guys who have a good crop this year and can sell it at these record prices are making a good year, but those people are few and far between as this drought covers such a huge area.

While I'm on it. Farm subsidies subsidize YOUR food, not the farmers pocket book. Yes farmers get the money, but the idea is that the farmer is subsidized so he grows corn, beans, wheat, whatever so that there is enough of it to keep the supply high and the cost low. It also helps to stabilize the markets on a normal year. What we are seeing here is a crop failure causing high prices because there won't be enough. It's not that the subsidy program didn't work and the farmers just got rich, it's that it did work, in fact in May it looked like a record harvest would happen and commodity prices would plunge to around $2 for corn, but then the drought hit and all that corn was lost. So now you have $8 corn. In fact many farmers made the mistake of selling at $4.50 cents this spring because all the reports led to a bumper crop.

One last thing before someone brings it up. Ethanol is not the problem either. There is plenty of yellow #2 corn for ethanol and feed. Which is a different corn then the sweet corn you eat for dinner. Yellow #2 corn is simply a feed corn. Alot of the biproduct of ethanol (distillers grain) gets used to feed livestock at a cheaper price then corn. The run up on meat prices is largely due to pasture failures and producers having to feed hay, corn, and other feeds much earlier in the year then on a normal year. Typically you would turn your cows lose in a pasture until around Thanksgiving. That way they could naturally feed off the grass that grows through the year. This year all that grass is burnt up and producers are having to buy feed earlier. I know several producers that started feeding hay around the 4th of July this year. Compare that to the typical date of Thanksgiving and that's a heck of a lot of extra input cost to a livestock producer. There is the run up on meat prices.

User avatar
GeddyWrox
Caught you a delicious bass
Posts: 14495
Joined: April 20 06, 8:43 pm
Location: Please use blue font for the sarcasm impaired.

Re: Rant: Farmers

Post by GeddyWrox »

All kidding aside, I have a lot of respect for farmers. I have never been on a working farm, so I probably don't fully understand just how hard it really is... but I am sure it ain't easy! I hope this year's drought is a once-in-50-years type event, and not a sign of years to come.

User avatar
GeddyWrox
Caught you a delicious bass
Posts: 14495
Joined: April 20 06, 8:43 pm
Location: Please use blue font for the sarcasm impaired.

Re: Rant: Farmers

Post by GeddyWrox »

Hudler has the right idea. Hooray for farm GIRLS!


Mildly NSFW:
[SHOW]
Image

Diddy
Perennial All-Star
Posts: 3583
Joined: April 18 06, 7:45 pm

Re: Rant: Farmers

Post by Diddy »

IMADreamer wrote: While I'm on it. Farm subsidies subsidize YOUR food, not the farmers pocket book. Yes farmers get the money, but the idea is that the farmer is subsidized so he grows corn, beans, wheat, whatever so that there is enough of it to keep the supply high and the cost low. It also helps to stabilize the markets on a normal year. What we are seeing here is a crop failure causing high prices because there won't be enough. It's not that the subsidy program didn't work and the farmers just got rich, it's that it did work, in fact in May it looked like a record harvest would happen and commodity prices would plunge to around $2 for corn, but then the drought hit and all that corn was lost. So now you have $8 corn. In fact many farmers made the mistake of selling at $4.50 cents this spring because all the reports led to a bumper crop.
this is why i hate subsidies id rather just have the crop priced at the appropriate level instead of the subsidies. If that would happen i think that farmers would be more profitable, problem is people want no subsidies and low food costs. Part of me wonders if the high prices this year, will move food prices up toward where they would need to be without subsidies. Farm bill will be interesting if they ever get it done.

Back in the spring one of my friends was braging that hed forward contracted 75% of his expected crop for $4.70 and we were all only going to be getting $2 for ours because of the bumper crop. Spoke to him the other day and hes contracted way over production and is going to have to buy $8 corn to sell at $4.70 to fill his contracts. That would hurt, and they are probably one of the best run opperations in the area so it can happen to anyone.

Most people dont know that most of the corn is still available in the form of ddgs after the ethanol process. THere are problems with feeding ddgs to poultry because the toxins are more consintrated in ddgs if they are present. I would actually expect meat prices to drop this fall, because of the high costs associated with feeding cattle so long, many are selling, so there is an excess of meat hitting the market. Many people are having to sell off herds that they have spent a lifetime building because there isnt any feed to be found at any price. THis sell off is happening at depressed prices because no one has the feed stuffs to overwinter these cattle. I know of two local farmers that are having to sell large numbers of cattle because their neighbors were burning trash and it got away and burnt down their hay barns. Thats why there is a burn ban idiots. Fortunatly im in good shape on hay and have only had to feed a few bales so far. I think ill be fine up till sept 1 without a rain.

We have revenue insurance on our corn so say for simplicities sake our historic average is 100bpa, we insure 75% of our normal production for the average. The price for these bu is and average of spring and fall price that will be set the end of october. so say the average price is 7.50, 75x7.5=$562.5. our corn averaged 60 bu so 60x7.5=450, so wed be looking at an insurance check of $112.50 per acre. Which is about $22.50 an acre more then we estimate this year at average yields and prices. Thats a very very oversimplified example, and i rounded our historic average down some to simplify the math, but yes because of crop insurance we will make 22.5 more then if we had raised a normal corn crop at normal prices.

Most policies are catastrophic policies not revenue and only pay out a minimum. the revenue insurance is very pricy, but with the widespread drought this year looks like a wise investment. In our area our bean base levels are so low that it doesnt pay to have a revenue insurance policy and most carry a cat if anything. I know most of our landlords dont carry any type of insurance on their share of the crop. Dad always said the corn pays the bills and you live on the beans, so the prospect of having a second straight year of low to no soybean yields is very stressful for many.

User avatar
IMADreamer
Has an anecdote about a townie he overheard.
Posts: 12872
Joined: December 6 10, 1:09 am
Location: Illinois

Re: Rant: Farmers

Post by IMADreamer »

Great post Diddy. I'm not sure where you live but I hope you caught some of that rain yesterday. We missed it all.

Yesterday was probably the worst farming day in our farms history. The only time I ever remember seeing my Dad so down was in 1993 when the whole thing went under water. We shelled all day yesterday and only got about a semi load and a half a hopper in the combine. So far it seems our Pioneer corn is by far the worst. The Mycogene hybrids we've been into are fairing much better.

User avatar
Sutter'sBeard
is the oscar meyer weiner kid
Posts: 3140
Joined: July 25 06, 1:02 pm
Location: Decatur, IL

Re: Rant: Farmers

Post by Sutter'sBeard »

IMADreamer wrote:Great post Diddy. I'm not sure where you live but I hope you caught some of that rain yesterday. We missed it all.

Yesterday was probably the worst farming day in our farms history. The only time I ever remember seeing my Dad so down was in 1993 when the whole thing went under water. We shelled all day yesterday and only got about a semi load and a half a hopper in the combine. So far it seems our Pioneer corn is by far the worst. The Mycogene hybrids we've been into are fairing much better.
This harvest is going to trickle down and devastate my whole area. We have the best soil on earth here and first reports are about 90 bushel corn. The ag industry had to take a lump sometime, I guess. We made it through the recession with record profits. Not too many industries could say that.

Post Reply