Well that's not true. At least not when it comes to the 2022 version of the free agent.
Okay, yeah they only voiced their Scherzer opinion for certain windows of FA periods and it had a statute of limitation lol. Was that clear in your response either?
Let me refresh your memory on that offseason, that was the big one where DeWitt himself proclaimed "we have money to spend" and the team still didn't even talk to Scherzer's agent. A bonafied stud who signed a reasonable contract and from St. Louis. And wanted to play here at a seemingly "discounted rate." Reportedly.
Thanks for keeping us all in line about everything from all time!
Hopefully soon, you will be the only poster on this board and we can just all congratulate you on all of your knowledge.
Well that's not true. At least not when it comes to the 2022 version of the free agent.
Okay, yeah they only voiced their Scherzer opinion for certain windows of FA periods and it had a statute of limitation lol. Was that clear in your response either?
Let me refresh your memory on that offseason, that was the big one where DeWitt himself proclaimed "we have money to spend" and the team still didn't even talk to Scherzer's agent. A bonafied stud who signed a reasonable contract and from St. Louis. And wanted to play here at a seemingly "discounted rate." Reportedly.
2015 is irrelevant. My comment was in response to someone suggesting Scherzer should have been signed this past off season.
Wait until the trade deadline and half of other teams' ace starters go down on the injury/disabled list. It'll be just like making a blockbuster trade during the off-season.