Edmonds heading to San Diego

Classic threads for your viewing pleasure.
Locked
User avatar
clement
Perennial All-Star
Posts: 6025
Joined: April 20 06, 10:26 pm

Re: Edmonds heading to San Diego

Post by clement »

skmsw wrote:When a relatively objective attempt to understand the mvoes runs into a string of multiple decisions ranging from hard to understand to bad, it looks like negativity. But when the moves defy objective analysis, saying so is not necessarily the same as the conventional use of the phrase "being negative."
They don't defy objective analysis. They defy your subjective analysis. A number of people have made very good arguments about why they think the trade was a good move or why it makes sense. Are you saying that all of these people who disagree with your analysis are incapable of making an objective analysis or are you saying that their subjective analysis simply yields a different conclusion than your subjective analysis?
but let's try not to reduce the ones who think they are hard to understand or bad as being negative. It's a disservice, equally unfair to suggesting that those who are waiting or OK with the moves are pollyanish.
Agreed. And while we're at it, let's not try to reduce the ones who think they are understandable or good as being incapable of thinking objectively about things.

User avatar
skmsw
Perennial All-Star
Posts: 6344
Joined: April 18 06, 7:12 pm
Location: The Hub

Re: Edmonds heading to San Diego

Post by skmsw »

Well, to any whom I've insulted with my occasionally know-it-all attitude I apologize. Certainly my opinion is but one of many.

I do leave open the possibility even for myself that some move or series of moves could still take place in which what we've seen so far finally becomes evident as some table-setting series of tapestries that position us better overall, and that in hindsight these decisions are someplace between defensible and productive. I don't see it so far, but as has been pointed out by others (whom I hope also recognize similar limitations of their own), things are not necessarily limited to what I perceive.

User avatar
Windy City Flyer
Veteran Player
Posts: 964
Joined: July 18 07, 2:53 pm
Contact:

Re: Edmonds heading to San Diego

Post by Windy City Flyer »

thrill wrote:Baseball wise, it's a non-move. We aren't going to get that much better production, nor worse. It gives Rasmus a year to season against MLB pitching, but that value is offset by early arby clock.

Sentimentality aside, this isn't something that deserves 50 pages.
/thread

User avatar
docellis
America's Most Beloved Twitter Joke Thief
Posts: 24839
Joined: April 18 06, 6:54 pm

Re: Edmonds heading to San Diego

Post by docellis »


User avatar
ghostrunner
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 25510
Joined: April 18 06, 9:40 pm

Re: Edmonds heading to San Diego

Post by ghostrunner »

All this before RC's had a chance to comment. :D


I should note this is also coming up on heyzeus' super happy fun thread in number of posts. I assume that's the record holder, but maybe I'm wrong.

planet planet
http://tinyurl.com/2e4x5hy
Posts: 24993
Joined: April 15 06, 6:25 pm
Location: St. Louis

Re: Edmonds heading to San Diego

Post by planet planet »

skmsw wrote:Well, to any whom I've insulted with my occasionally know-it-all attitude I apologize. Certainly my opinion is but one of many.

I do leave open the possibility even for myself that some move or series of moves could still take place in which what we've seen so far finally becomes evident as some table-setting series of tapestries that position us better overall, and that in hindsight these decisions are someplace between defensible and productive. I don't see it so far, but as has been pointed out by others (whom I hope also recognize similar limitations of their own), things are not necessarily limited to what I perceive.
I appreciate the conciliatory thoughts, even as you stand fast by your opinions. I'm heartened by the responses the Edmonds trade has evoked, rather than shrugging it off.

User avatar
BW23
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 13026
Joined: July 7 06, 11:08 pm

Re: Edmonds heading to San Diego

Post by BW23 »

ghostrunner wrote:All this before RC's had a chance to comment. :D


I should note this is also coming up on heyzeus' super happy fun thread in number of posts. I assume that's the record holder, but maybe I'm wrong.
Wait 'til Rolen's dealt.

User avatar
sighyoung
Mayor of GRB
Posts: 34563
Joined: April 17 06, 7:42 pm
Location: Louisville

Re: Edmonds heading to San Diego

Post by sighyoung »

I'm enjoying reading the thread, and happier still that I've completed avoided the discussion.

I've been left out of too many archived threads to sit this one out.

TimeForGuinness
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 20035
Joined: April 18 06, 7:38 pm

Re: Edmonds heading to San Diego

Post by TimeForGuinness »

Once RC21 replies....the thread will be locked

User avatar
Radbird
There's someone in my head but it's not me
Posts: 45622
Joined: April 18 06, 5:08 pm
Location: LF Bleachers @ Busch II

Re: Edmonds heading to San Diego

Post by Radbird »

TimeForGuinness wrote:Once RC21 replies....the thread will be locked
Is he RC21* yet?

(plus, I wanted to be responsible for making this a 50-pager)

Locked