Page 2 of 3

Re: Garfield without Garfield

Posted: April 2 08, 10:58 am
by doe_boy
Arthur Dent wrote:
doe_boy wrote:That puts the F-U-N in funny!
Garfield with Garfield on the other hand belongs in the super miserable boring thread.
Agreed! Could we include Dilbert as well?

Garfield minus Garfield

Posted: April 12 08, 12:07 am
by JackofDiamonds
It's amazing how twisted John Arbuckle really is. This site is incredible.

Image

Re: Garfield minus Garfield

Posted: April 12 08, 11:29 am
by StatmanCrothers
we had a thread on this recently, but there really can't be too many.

Re: Garfield minus Garfield

Posted: April 12 08, 11:57 am
by heyzeus

Re: Garfield minus Garfield

Posted: April 12 08, 2:55 pm
by Cole Burns
Hey Snayke, can you merge these threads?

Re: Garfield minus Garfield

Posted: April 12 08, 4:03 pm
by JackofDiamonds
This is what happens when you don't read the forums for 6 months.

Re: Garfield minus Garfield

Posted: April 12 08, 4:09 pm
by G. Keenan
Cole Burns wrote:Hey Snayke, can you merge these threads?
Snayke can't, but I can.

Re: Garfield minus Garfield

Posted: April 13 08, 1:38 am
by JCShutout
None of the pictures show up when I open the page. I don't even get a box with an X or anything. The rest of the site loads, and the box with the date is there, but nothing else.

Re: Garfield minus Garfield

Posted: June 28 08, 1:47 pm
by sighyoung

Re: Garfield minus Garfield

Posted: January 30 20, 12:19 pm
by heyzeus