Interesting.
If I go to twitter . com like always, and then copy the URL of a tweet I want to embed, I get this:
[tweet]https://twitter.com/johnrabe/status/1696334468800258558[/tweet]
But if I simply replace the "twitter . com" with "x . com" (no spaces), it seems to work.
Tweet viewing
- GeddyWrox
- Caught you a delicious bass
- Posts: 12657
- Joined: April 20 06, 8:43 pm
- Location: Please use blue font for the sarcasm impaired.
- CardsofSTL
- All Hail the GDT Master
- Posts: 47142
- Joined: April 26 11, 6:06 am
- Location: Columbus, OH
Re: Tweet viewing
I think when you copy it on a mobile device the URL is x.com but on a laptop or desktop it is still coming up twitter.com; or sometimes it is coming up twitter or x. If you make sure the pasted link is x.com; it will embed properly.
- GeddyWrox
- Caught you a delicious bass
- Posts: 12657
- Joined: April 20 06, 8:43 pm
- Location: Please use blue font for the sarcasm impaired.
Re: Tweet viewing
Noooowwwwwwwwwwww you tell me.CardsofSTL wrote: ↑August 29 23, 9:19 pmI think when you copy it on a mobile device the URL is x.com but on a laptop or desktop it is still coming up twitter.com; or sometimes it is coming up twitter or x. If you make sure the pasted link is x.com; it will embed properly.

- CardsofSTL
- All Hail the GDT Master
- Posts: 47142
- Joined: April 26 11, 6:06 am
- Location: Columbus, OH
Re: Tweet viewing
I thought everyone knew that.GeddyWrox wrote: ↑August 30 23, 12:40 pmNoooowwwwwwwwwwww you tell me.CardsofSTL wrote: ↑August 29 23, 9:19 pmI think when you copy it on a mobile device the URL is x.com but on a laptop or desktop it is still coming up twitter.com; or sometimes it is coming up twitter or x. If you make sure the pasted link is x.com; it will embed properly.![]()
-
- Hall Of Famer
- Posts: 12255
- Joined: April 25 06, 6:43 pm
- Location: Austin
Re: Tweet viewing
It’s a bit confusing to me as if you try to mimic a still working example from a post made before the change, it doesn’t work. I’m kind of curious how the implementation is done as I thought phpBB renders tags at view time rather than post time, so is there like a cutoff timestamp used to correctly render both old and new posts?
- TheoSqua
- Next Gen Wart
- Posts: 8884
- Joined: April 22 06, 6:53 pm
- Location: St. Louis
- Contact:
Re: Tweet viewing
I also thought that phpBB renders tags at view time, so that's strange. It could be cached (either on your local machine or on the twitter servers).Arthur Dent wrote: ↑August 30 23, 4:25 pmIt’s a bit confusing to me as if you try to mimic a still working example from a post made before the change, it doesn’t work. I’m kind of curious how the implementation is done as I thought phpBB renders tags at view time rather than post time, so is there like a cutoff timestamp used to correctly render both old and new posts?