Pujols Signs With Angels
- Cronos
- In perpetuum
- Posts: 34782
- Joined: June 30 06, 7:49 am
- Location: St. Louis
Re: Pujols Signs With Angels
Another good thing: at least he goes to a different AL team than the Sawx or Yankees.
-
Socnorb11
- The Last Word
- Posts: 21899
- Joined: June 21 06, 8:45 am
Re: Pujols Signs With Angels
Cronos wrote:Disagree. It's not that he took that much money to go and play for the Orioles, Pirates, Cubs or Royals. If he had done that, then yes, it would have been only for the money.Socnorb11 wrote:Probably already posted by somebody, but I'm angry - not because Albert took the money, so much. I'm angry because he specifically said that it wasn't just about the money. It clearly was JUST about the money. The Cardinals have won 2 World Series' in 6 years. It's not about winning for Albert.
The Angels are a good team ready to win right now, with a good manager and a payroll (that has obviously become ginormous) dedicated to winning.
The Cardinals are in as good a position to win as the Angels. So essentially, being a Cardinal meant virtually nothing to him. He wanted the money.
I'm not saying that I blame him for wanting the money....... but don't pretend it's not about the money when it really is.
Last edited by Socnorb11 on December 8 11, 10:15 am, edited 1 time in total.
- Bo Hart
- Perennial All-Star
- Posts: 8770
- Joined: April 14 06, 9:50 pm
Re: Pujols Signs With Angels
It wasn't all about the money. The Cardinals offer is simply not competitive compared to what the Angels were offering.Socnorb11 wrote:Probably already posted by somebody, but I'm angry - not because Albert took the money, so much. I'm angry because he specifically said that it wasn't just about the money. It clearly was JUST about the money. The Cardinals have won 2 World Series' in 6 years. It's not about winning for Albert.
I've lost respect for him.
-
jagtrader
- Hall Of Famer
- Posts: 12128
- Joined: June 5 06, 10:01 am
Re: Pujols Signs With Angels
Good for Pujols. He gets a boatload of cash and can DH while playing for a winner in the short-term. Good for Cardinals. Aside from the emotional disappointment, they can't pay one player that much. Good for Angels? Maybe, but probably not. Hard to see this deal working out financially.
- JL21
- NPR & THT Contributor
- Posts: 36110
- Joined: April 18 06, 7:44 am
- Location: Chocolate City
Re: Pujols Signs With Angels
Agreed.Socnorb11 wrote:The Cardinals are in as good a position to win as the Cardinals.
- go birds
- -go birds
- Posts: 32049
- Joined: February 5 10, 9:54 am
Re: Pujols Signs With Angels
Wouldn't that mean by definition it was about the money?
-
Socnorb11
- The Last Word
- Posts: 21899
- Joined: June 21 06, 8:45 am
Re: Pujols Signs With Angels
JL21 wrote:Agreed.Socnorb11 wrote:The Cardinals are in as good a position to win as the Cardinals.
Ha. Thanks, I went back and fixed that.
- ThatGuy
- Perennial All-Star
- Posts: 5114
- Joined: October 15 06, 4:40 pm
- Location: Knoxville, TN
Re: Pujols Signs With Angels
I'd like to hear his reasoning before I agree or disagree.JL21 wrote:Agreed.Socnorb11 wrote:The Cardinals are in as good a position to win as the Cardinals.
- Bo Hart
- Perennial All-Star
- Posts: 8770
- Joined: April 14 06, 9:50 pm
Re: Pujols Signs With Angels
The point is that there's a difference in going to a team that's offering $50M more versus a team that's offering $1M more. The latter is an example of someone being "all about money", the former is simply common sense.go birds wrote:Wouldn't that mean by definition it was about the money?
- cpebbles
- Perennial All-Star
- Posts: 8829
- Joined: August 30 07, 12:28 pm
Re: Pujols Signs With Angels
I just wish he'd gone to a better offensive stadium where his numbers would have held up longer. I don't fault him for taking the offer and, depending on the details, I don't fault the Cardinals for not matching the offer.



