AdmiralKird wrote:
The only debate should be how large Heyzeus' pony signature should be for creating a three page discussion on this ludicrious argument.
Would you like it larger? I'm pretty sure it could be larger.
AdmiralKird wrote:
The only debate should be how large Heyzeus' pony signature should be for creating a three page discussion on this ludicrious argument.
That's how it would read if it had the comma. But it doesn't. I get the humor in it, but with correct punctuation, it wasn't a problem.cards2468 wrote:It reads like the writer is saying "At last, singer Etta James dies." Like we've all been waiting for it to happen.MrCrowesGarden wrote:Am I missing something? The way Richie has it linked is correct, isn't it?G. Keenan wrote:Oh man. That's terrible, but also hilarious.Richie Allen wrote:Not Oxford comma related but I thought of this discussion and the importance of punctuation when I saw this headline.
"At Last" Singer Etta James Dies
I'm reading it that way as well.MrCrowesGarden wrote:That's how it would read if it had the comma. But it doesn't. I get the humor in it, but with correct punctuation, it wasn't a problem.
You have to put a comma there?Adrian Wapcaplet wrote:It's the comma before the "and" in a series of three things. For example: periods, commas, and other punctuation. Pujols, Edmonds, and Rolen.
Some people try to argue that it's unnecessary because you pause before the "and" anyway. But it's simply not true that you pause every time you see an "and." When people see "Green Eggs and Ham" they don't read it as "Green Eggs, and Ham."
This is, oddly enough, something I'm passionate about.
The cartoon explains the necessity of the comma:jim wrote:You have to put a comma there?Adrian Wapcaplet wrote:It's the comma before the "and" in a series of three things. For example: periods, commas, and other punctuation. Pujols, Edmonds, and Rolen.
Some people try to argue that it's unnecessary because you pause before the "and" anyway. But it's simply not true that you pause every time you see an "and." When people see "Green Eggs and Ham" they don't read it as "Green Eggs, and Ham."
This is, oddly enough, something I'm passionate about.

Only if you care about communicating clearly with the reader. Granted, it might not look necessary in a sentence like "The members of MV3 were Pujols, Edmonds, and Rolen." because you can see the end of the sentence and it's obvious that "Edmonds and Rolen" are not a single entity. But I encourage people to get in the habit of always using the serial comma because in longer, more complex sentences, using it will definitely prevent your meaning from being misconstrued.jim wrote:You have to put a comma there?Adrian Wapcaplet wrote:It's the comma before the "and" in a series of three things. For example: periods, commas, and other punctuation. Pujols, Edmonds, and Rolen.
Some people try to argue that it's unnecessary because you pause before the "and" anyway. But it's simply not true that you pause every time you see an "and." When people see "Green Eggs and Ham" they don't read it as "Green Eggs, and Ham."
This is, oddly enough, something I'm passionate about.