Joe Shlabotnik wrote:Slow down Cowboy. I wasn't trying to ruffle any feathers. I agree that I like Bernie's arguments better. In fact, its stuff people have been seeing the last year and a half around here.
The irony is, people in St. Louis were ,by and large, ready to tolerate a decline in his production for what he gave the team all those years. You can say "Yeah, for $40 million less." If I'm Albert, I think I would have thought "Yeah, for $23-25 million a year. And I will be an eternal legend. Sounds good to me."
Oh well.
Yeah, I definitely agree. Cardinals fans, had the CArdinals signed him for 9/10 years for 200/220, would have been fine with that and known they were paying for his decline but more importantly were going to see the best hitter of our generation retire a Cardinal.
Now, we've just got to be happy to see the best hitter of our generation in his prime and not pay for his decline.
RE: Bernie/Plaschke. I didn't see Bernie's piece as trying to come down on Albert for anything but rather just take a look at what was happening (swinging at worse pitches) where Plaschke just rambled on about how he hasn't hit a homerun.