Time to get Oswalt - Too late, he's a Ranger (pg 7)

Discuss all things Cardinals Baseball
Post Reply
jagtrader
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 12361
Joined: June 5 06, 10:01 am

Re: Time to get Oswalt

Post by jagtrader »

Oswalt hasn't pitched for seven months and is at least a month from getting on the mound for the Cardinals. But if his WAR was OK last season, let's do it! That 0.6 wins, or whatever [expletive] value is taken as gospel, could make the difference.

Magneto2.0
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 18018
Joined: June 16 07, 2:12 pm

Re: Time to get Oswalt

Post by Magneto2.0 »

Popeye_Card wrote:
Magneto2.0 wrote:
Popeye_Card wrote:
docellis wrote:I'd think, if anything, the demand is less.
We're sitting here talking about needing to run out and get Oswalt for insurance for *our* rotation--2nd in the NL. Demand is high for pitching throughout the league, and it will only get greater as the deadline rolls around.
Magneto2.0 wrote: Ummm I would have. Oswalt is definitely better than Garcia.
Really?

Sure, 10 years ago. But 34 year old, bad back Oswalt vs. 25 year old, entering his prime Garcia?
Last two seasons Oswalt had a better WAR (Even considering he pitched nearly 60 less innings than Garcia in 2011), better K:BB ratio, and better adjusted ERA.

I trust Baseball Reference's WAR more than Fangraph's.
WAR for pitchers is nearly useless, no matter where you get it from.
Reasonable thought. But he also had a better K:BB ratio, and adjusted ERA

Online
User avatar
Popeye_Card
GRB's most intelligent & humble poster
Posts: 30920
Joined: April 17 06, 11:25 am

Re: Time to get Oswalt

Post by Popeye_Card »

Magneto2.0 wrote: Reasonable thought. But he also had a better K:BB ratio, and adjusted ERA
Relatively minor points. Oswalt bested Garcia in ERA+ by 2 points in 2010, and 1 point in 2011. Their K:BB ratio's crossed paths last season, with Garcia's getting better and Oswalt's getting worse.

There's the more major point that at 25, Garcia should be progressing towards his peak years. Oswalt at 34 and with a bad back is probably going to be trending down.

For S's and G's, ZiPS ROS:

Garcia 3.60 ERA, 3.19 FIP, 6.96 K/9, 2.70 BB/9, 2.58 K:BB
Oswalt 3.68 ERA, 3.59 FIP, 6.66 K/9, 2.28 BB/9, 2.92 K:BB

Virtual dead heat.

Magneto2.0
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 18018
Joined: June 16 07, 2:12 pm

Re: Time to get Oswalt

Post by Magneto2.0 »

Popeye_Card wrote:
Magneto2.0 wrote: Reasonable thought. But he also had a better K:BB ratio, and adjusted ERA
Relatively minor points. Oswalt bested Garcia in ERA+ by 2 points in 2010, and 1 point in 2011. Their K:BB ratio's crossed paths last season, with Garcia's getting better and Oswalt's getting worse.

There's the more major point that at 25, Garcia should be progressing towards his peak years. Oswalt at 34 and with a bad back is probably going to be trending down.

For S's and G's, ZiPS ROS:

Garcia 3.60 ERA, 3.19 FIP, 6.96 K/9, 2.70 BB/9, 2.58 K:BB
Oswalt 3.68 ERA, 3.59 FIP, 6.66 K/9, 2.28 BB/9, 2.92 K:BB

Virtual dead heat.
True but I'm speaking just for one season. Now if the option is Garcia and Oswalt for the next few seasons, then it's not even a question. Definitely Garcia. I just think Garcia has looked really bad this year. And I'm a huge fan of his upside/potential, and what he already has shown his first two full seasons. But something is just off right now.


But then when I think about it, even if the Cardinals do eventually sign Oswalt, he'd much more likely be replacing Westbrook than Garcia in the rotation.

User avatar
go birds
-go birds
Posts: 32053
Joined: February 5 10, 9:54 am

Re: Time to get Oswalt

Post by go birds »

I think we need to explore the trade market and use some of our minor league depth to pull off a blockbuster.

IMO

AWvsCBsteeeerike3
"I could totally eat a pig butt, if smoked correctly!"
Posts: 27537
Joined: August 5 08, 11:24 am
Location: Thinking of the Children

Re: Time to get Oswalt

Post by AWvsCBsteeeerike3 »

Gracias problem isn't command or velocity or movement or anything that can be adjusted. His problem is that his delivery is simply unrepeatable over the longhaul without severely tearing his shoulder and elbow up. It's likely were already seeing the effects of it and it'll only get worse. In short, trade Garcia before he becomes rich hill for 10 nil a year or whatever.

User avatar
lukethedrifter
darjeeling sipping elite
Posts: 37257
Joined: October 17 06, 11:19 am
Location: Huis Clos

Re: Time to get Oswalt

Post by lukethedrifter »

AWvsCBsteeeerike3 wrote:Gracias problem isn't command or velocity or movement or anything that can be adjusted. His problem is that his delivery is simply unrepeatable over the longhaul without severely tearing his shoulder and elbow up. It's likely were already seeing the effects of it and it'll only get worse. In short, trade Garcia before he becomes rich hill for 10 nil a year or whatever.
I agree that Beerstrike started drinking early on Mother's Day

User avatar
BW23
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 12896
Joined: July 7 06, 11:08 pm

Re: Time to get Oswalt

Post by BW23 »

I'm more concerned about finding a couple of bullpen arms than I am adding Oswalt who wouldn't help for 4-6 weeks anyway.

User avatar
cpebbles
Perennial All-Star
Posts: 8829
Joined: August 30 07, 12:28 pm

Re: Time to get Oswalt

Post by cpebbles »

Convince Ruben Amaro that he needs to clear up payroll space to make a run at Josh Hamilton, then trade Garcia for Halladay!

User avatar
Fat_Bulldog
likes to grate his own cheese
Posts: 12841
Joined: May 9 06, 12:41 pm
Location: Drunk

Re: Time to get Oswalt

Post by Fat_Bulldog »

jagtrader wrote:Oswalt hasn't pitched for seven months and is at least a month from getting on the mound for the Cardinals. But if his WAR was OK last season, let's do it! That 0.6 wins, or whatever [expletive] value is taken as gospel, could make the difference.
:D

Post Reply