2016 Election Thread (My God Kill Me Now)
-
AWvsCBsteeeerike3
- "I could totally eat a pig butt, if smoked correctly!"
- Posts: 27537
- Joined: August 5 08, 11:24 am
- Location: Thinking of the Children
Re: 2016 Election Thread (My God Kill Me Now)
lol, a guy can't even post who his least favorite politician is without being corrected.
-
Jocephus
- 99% conan clips
- Posts: 64992
- Joined: April 18 06, 5:14 pm
Re: 2016 Election Thread (My God Kill Me Now)
thats not really true though. they merely added their perspective to jims. jims is still as valid as he wants it to be.
- Schlich
- Don't tone police me bro!
- Posts: 10841
- Joined: July 1 06, 7:24 pm
- Location: Lost in the Cloud
Re: 2016 Election Thread (My God Kill Me Now)
If she thinks that a $15 minimum wage is too high for 50% of New Yorkers who don't live in NYC, then she should come out and say so. But she won't ever do that, because that's not gonna be a tenable position among Democrats moving forward, and most likely an untenable position in general. Like I said, hedged bets.ghostrunner wrote:So, minimum of $1.60 in 1969. The most you could ever buy with the minimum wage. Obviously that varies place to place, and what you can buy isn't the same everywhere, but generally it's very good compared to all other minimums since it was instated.
In 2007, when Clinton introduces legislation to raise it to $9.50, that $1.60 was equivalent to $9.04.
Today, $1.60 translates to $10.34. So she supports $12 instead of $15, when $15 is arguably overkill in some areas of the country.
I don't see any reason to paint her as a johnny-come-lately on this.
- ghostrunner
- GOAT
- Posts: 30603
- Joined: April 18 06, 9:40 pm
Re: 2016 Election Thread (My God Kill Me Now)
When you stake out a position at $12 an hour, isn't that what you're saying?Schlich wrote:If she thinks that a $15 minimum wage is too high for 50% of New Yorkers who don't live in NYC, then she should come out and say so. But she won't ever do that, because that's not gonna be a tenable position among Democrats moving forward, and most likely an untenable position in general. Like I said, hedged bets.ghostrunner wrote:So, minimum of $1.60 in 1969. The most you could ever buy with the minimum wage. Obviously that varies place to place, and what you can buy isn't the same everywhere, but generally it's very good compared to all other minimums since it was instated.
In 2007, when Clinton introduces legislation to raise it to $9.50, that $1.60 was equivalent to $9.04.
Today, $1.60 translates to $10.34. So she supports $12 instead of $15, when $15 is arguably overkill in some areas of the country.
I don't see any reason to paint her as a johnny-come-lately on this.
Edit - also the NY increase she's ostensibly supporting is taking all this into account:
The state budget includes a historic increase in the minimum wage, ultimately reaching $15 an hour for all workers in all industries across the state.
For workers in New York City employed by large businesses (those with at least 11 employees), the minimum wage would rise to $11 at the end of 2016, then another $2 each year after, reaching $15 on 12/31/2018.
For workers in New York City employed by small businesses (those with 10 employees or fewer), the minimum wage would rise to $10.50 by the end of 2016, then another $1.50 each year after, reaching $15 on 12/31/2019.
For workers in Nassau, Suffolk and Westchester Counties, the minimum wage would increase to $10 at the end of 2016, then $1 each year after, reaching $15 on 12/31/2021.
For workers in the rest of the state, the minimum wage would increase to $9.70 at the end of 2016, then another .70 each year after until reaching $12.50 on 12/31/2020 – after which will continue to increase to $15 on an indexed schedule to be set by the Director of the Division of Budget in consultation with the Department of Labor.
- Cheddar Tom
- Perennial All-Star
- Posts: 5885
- Joined: May 13 09, 2:55 pm
Re: 2016 Election Thread (My God Kill Me Now)
Yeah that's how I took it.Jocephus wrote:thats not really true though. they merely added their perspective to jims. jims is still as valid as he wants it to be.
- Schlich
- Don't tone police me bro!
- Posts: 10841
- Joined: July 1 06, 7:24 pm
- Location: Lost in the Cloud
Re: 2016 Election Thread (My God Kill Me Now)
That's interesting, and makes the hypocrisy somewhat more tenable.ghostrunner wrote:When you stake out a position at $12 an hour, isn't that what you're saying?Schlich wrote:If she thinks that a $15 minimum wage is too high for 50% of New Yorkers who don't live in NYC, then she should come out and say so. But she won't ever do that, because that's not gonna be a tenable position among Democrats moving forward, and most likely an untenable position in general. Like I said, hedged bets.
Edit - also the NY increase she's ostensibly supporting is taking all this into account:
The state budget includes a historic increase in the minimum wage, ultimately reaching $15 an hour for all workers in all industries across the state.
For workers in New York City employed by large businesses (those with at least 11 employees), the minimum wage would rise to $11 at the end of 2016, then another $2 each year after, reaching $15 on 12/31/2018.
For workers in New York City employed by small businesses (those with 10 employees or fewer), the minimum wage would rise to $10.50 by the end of 2016, then another $1.50 each year after, reaching $15 on 12/31/2019.
For workers in Nassau, Suffolk and Westchester Counties, the minimum wage would increase to $10 at the end of 2016, then $1 each year after, reaching $15 on 12/31/2021.
For workers in the rest of the state, the minimum wage would increase to $9.70 at the end of 2016, then another .70 each year after until reaching $12.50 on 12/31/2020 – after which will continue to increase to $15 on an indexed schedule to be set by the Director of the Division of Budget in consultation with the Department of Labor.
Why can't she incorporate similar strategies in her platform then? Sanders wants to phase out the min wage increase over several years. Why does she has to stake herself out on the more conservative side of every argument? It's because that's what's going to win her this election. Again, it has nothing to do with economics. If it was, she wouldn't be celebrating this as a victory.
And again, Sanders is just as guilty of playing the politics on this. But he's not the one serving as a major impediment to progressive values this election cycle.
- Schlich
- Don't tone police me bro!
- Posts: 10841
- Joined: July 1 06, 7:24 pm
- Location: Lost in the Cloud
Re: 2016 Election Thread (My God Kill Me Now)
Basically, I'm not saying Hillary is a johnny-come-lately, as you put it. I'm saying "let the states decide" is the ultimate cop-out that lets you stand on both sides of an argument.
- IMADreamer
- Has an anecdote about a townie he overheard.
- Posts: 12872
- Joined: December 6 10, 1:09 am
- Location: Illinois
Re: 2016 Election Thread (My God Kill Me Now)
What's nuts about all of this is we still have six months to go.
- heyzeus
- Everday Unicorn
- Posts: 43075
- Joined: April 21 06, 10:14 am
- Location: Austin, TX
Re: 2016 Election Thread (My God Kill Me Now)
The dream of 1000 pages is alive (in Portland).IMADreamer wrote:What's nuts about all of this is we still have six months to go.
- Joe Shlabotnik
- Hall Of Famer
- Posts: 24169
- Joined: October 12 06, 2:21 pm
- Location: Baseball Ref Bullpen
- Contact:
Re: 2016 Election Thread (My God Kill Me Now)
I'm calling 3000. To account for violence at the conventions, a very contentious fall campaign complete with a competitive 3rd party, and a close election nights where the winner just barely gets enough to keep the election from going to the House of Representatives.heyzeus wrote:The dream of 1000 pages is alive (in Portland).IMADreamer wrote:What's nuts about all of this is we still have six months to go.



