Carpenter Signed through 2011, op. 2012 (Matthew Leach)
- Jmodene
- Still waiting for someone to use a Weird Al song
- Posts: 15528
- Joined: April 18 06, 5:54 pm
- Location: Las Vegas, NV
-
Magneto
- Veteran Player
- Posts: 984
- Joined: April 20 06, 5:39 pm
If Chris Carpenter was on the market, do you realize how much he'd be getting in? This is a huge bargain. 5 years might be the only draw back, and even then, he'll just be 36 at the end of the contract, and even if he had a bad last year, him being good for the next 4 alone is worth it. Unless Carpenter doesn't pitch the last 3 years of the contract, I don't see how this is a bad deal at all. He's the best pitcher in the NL.Michael wrote:I'm not sure if I like or dislike the extension, to be honest I'm still digesting it. I guess it all depends on the savings they received by getting it done a year earlier. It's certainly interesting.Magneto wrote:How someone can dislike this is completely mind boggling. Wow.
Great for Carpenter and the Cards.
I mean Kevin Millwood signed for 6/60 for god's sake. LOL.
- ghostrunner
- GOAT
- Posts: 30813
- Joined: April 18 06, 9:40 pm
It tells fans and other players that the organization is serious about continuing to win in the near future. There has to be some value in that. There appears to have been in Rolen's case.
Sure he could get injured this year. He could also get injured the next year, assuming we waited for this season to be over before signing him. The market could settle, it could continue moving skyward, especially if the Yankees continue to overpay for crap.
For all we know, Carpenter was asking to do something now, and had a number and years in mind. Maybe they went back and forth on it, and arrived at this number. He's a great guy by most accounts, and a Cy Young winner.
In this case, I don't mind picking safe over sorry.
Sure he could get injured this year. He could also get injured the next year, assuming we waited for this season to be over before signing him. The market could settle, it could continue moving skyward, especially if the Yankees continue to overpay for crap.
For all we know, Carpenter was asking to do something now, and had a number and years in mind. Maybe they went back and forth on it, and arrived at this number. He's a great guy by most accounts, and a Cy Young winner.
In this case, I don't mind picking safe over sorry.
- ToughGuy_BlueShirt
- Perennial All-Star
- Posts: 4211
- Joined: May 19 06, 3:30 pm
Won't he be 38 at the end of his contract?Magneto wrote:If Chris Carpenter was on the market, do you realize how much he'd be getting in? This is a huge bargain. 5 years might be the only draw back, and even then, he'll just be 36 at the end of the contract, and even if he had a bad last year, him being good for the next 4 alone is worth it. Unless Carpenter doesn't pitch the last 3 years of the contract, I don't see how this is a bad deal at all. He's the best pitcher in the NL.Michael wrote:I'm not sure if I like or dislike the extension, to be honest I'm still digesting it. I guess it all depends on the savings they received by getting it done a year earlier. It's certainly interesting.Magneto wrote:How someone can dislike this is completely mind boggling. Wow.
Great for Carpenter and the Cards.
I mean Kevin Millwood signed for 6/60 for god's sake. LOL.
-
Michael
- GRB Founder
- Posts: 35303
- Joined: December 31 69, 6:00 pm
- Location: Chicago, IL
- Contact:
Magneto wrote:If Chris Carpenter was on the market, do you realize how much he'd be getting in? This is a huge bargain. 5 years might be the only draw back, and even then, he'll just be 36 at the end of the contract, and even if he had a bad last year, him being good for the next 4 alone is worth it. Unless Carpenter doesn't pitch the last 3 years of the contract, I don't see how this is a bad deal at all. He's the best pitcher in the NL.Michael wrote:I'm not sure if I like or dislike the extension, to be honest I'm still digesting it. I guess it all depends on the savings they received by getting it done a year earlier. It's certainly interesting.Magneto wrote:How someone can dislike this is completely mind boggling. Wow.
Great for Carpenter and the Cards.
I mean Kevin Millwood signed for 6/60 for god's sake. LOL.
Yeah, but we already had him locked up for 2 years. Millwood was a FA when he signed his contract. A lot can happen to a pitcher in 2 years - good or bad.
-
Magneto
- Veteran Player
- Posts: 984
- Joined: April 20 06, 5:39 pm
He'll be 36.ToughGuy_BlueShirt wrote:Won't he be 38 at the end of his contract?Magneto wrote:If Chris Carpenter was on the market, do you realize how much he'd be getting in? This is a huge bargain. 5 years might be the only draw back, and even then, he'll just be 36 at the end of the contract, and even if he had a bad last year, him being good for the next 4 alone is worth it. Unless Carpenter doesn't pitch the last 3 years of the contract, I don't see how this is a bad deal at all. He's the best pitcher in the NL.Michael wrote:I'm not sure if I like or dislike the extension, to be honest I'm still digesting it. I guess it all depends on the savings they received by getting it done a year earlier. It's certainly interesting.Magneto wrote:How someone can dislike this is completely mind boggling. Wow.
Great for Carpenter and the Cards.
I mean Kevin Millwood signed for 6/60 for god's sake. LOL.
- Secret Weapon
- Perennial All-Star
- Posts: 8386
- Joined: May 12 06, 7:09 pm
- Location: CoMo
Yeah but it's a much different scenario, Carpenter wasn't a FA, he still had 2 years/15 million left on his current deal. Basically they tacked on 50 million for 3 years after that, which will be a little over 16 million per year once his current contract is over. I don't think it's a bad contract, but I also don't think the Cardinals are getting some huge bargain for the amount of risk they are taking on at the moment.Magneto wrote:If Chris Carpenter was on the market, do you realize how much he'd be getting in? This is a huge bargain. 5 years might be the only draw back, and even then, he'll just be 36 at the end of the contract, and even if he had a bad last year, him being good for the next 4 alone is worth it. Unless Carpenter doesn't pitch the last 3 years of the contract, I don't see how this is a bad deal at all. He's the best pitcher in the NL.Michael wrote:I'm not sure if I like or dislike the extension, to be honest I'm still digesting it. I guess it all depends on the savings they received by getting it done a year earlier. It's certainly interesting.Magneto wrote:How someone can dislike this is completely mind boggling. Wow.
Great for Carpenter and the Cards.
I mean Kevin Millwood signed for 6/60 for god's sake. LOL.
-
Magneto
- Veteran Player
- Posts: 984
- Joined: April 20 06, 5:39 pm
It's better to have him locked up then not to. That's how I feel about it. Carpenter is worth more then 13 million a season. Zito will make more then him, and Zito isn't even on the same planet as Chris pitching wise.Michael wrote:Magneto wrote:If Chris Carpenter was on the market, do you realize how much he'd be getting in? This is a huge bargain. 5 years might be the only draw back, and even then, he'll just be 36 at the end of the contract, and even if he had a bad last year, him being good for the next 4 alone is worth it. Unless Carpenter doesn't pitch the last 3 years of the contract, I don't see how this is a bad deal at all. He's the best pitcher in the NL.Michael wrote:I'm not sure if I like or dislike the extension, to be honest I'm still digesting it. I guess it all depends on the savings they received by getting it done a year earlier. It's certainly interesting.Magneto wrote:How someone can dislike this is completely mind boggling. Wow.
Great for Carpenter and the Cards.
I mean Kevin Millwood signed for 6/60 for god's sake. LOL.
Yeah, but we already had him locked up for 2 years. Millwood was a FA when he signed his contract. A lot can happen to a pitcher in 2 years - good or bad.
-
Magneto
- Veteran Player
- Posts: 984
- Joined: April 20 06, 5:39 pm
In a market were Lilly and Suppan will make close to 10 a year, 16 might not be a bargain per se, but it's still a very good contract.whyhellothere wrote:Yeah but it's a much different scenario, Carpenter wasn't a FA, he still had 2 years/15 million left on his current deal. Basically they tacked on 50 million for 3 years after that, which will be a little over 16 million per year once his current contract is over. I don't think it's a bad contract, but I also don't think the Cardinals are getting some huge bargain for the amount of risk they are taking on at the moment.Magneto wrote:If Chris Carpenter was on the market, do you realize how much he'd be getting in? This is a huge bargain. 5 years might be the only draw back, and even then, he'll just be 36 at the end of the contract, and even if he had a bad last year, him being good for the next 4 alone is worth it. Unless Carpenter doesn't pitch the last 3 years of the contract, I don't see how this is a bad deal at all. He's the best pitcher in the NL.Michael wrote:I'm not sure if I like or dislike the extension, to be honest I'm still digesting it. I guess it all depends on the savings they received by getting it done a year earlier. It's certainly interesting.Magneto wrote:How someone can dislike this is completely mind boggling. Wow.
Great for Carpenter and the Cards.
I mean Kevin Millwood signed for 6/60 for god's sake. LOL.
-
Michael
- GRB Founder
- Posts: 35303
- Joined: December 31 69, 6:00 pm
- Location: Chicago, IL
- Contact:
I agree, he's better than Zito. But you are comparing a FA contract to an extension for a player who had 2 years left on his deal. I don't hate this deal but I wouldn't call it a no brainier. I'm just curious how much more the contract would have cost if they had waited a year. Like I said, it's a very interesting extension.Magneto wrote:It's better to have him locked up then not to. That's how I feel about it. Carpenter is worth more then 13 million a season. Zito will make more then him, and Zito isn't even on the same planet as Chris pitching wise.
Last edited by Michael on December 4 06, 8:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.


