movies

Chat about non-baseball topics. No political discussions!
Post Reply
User avatar
cardinalkarp
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 18743
Joined: May 4 06, 8:44 am

Re: movies

Post by cardinalkarp »

"Sully" kinda sucked.

User avatar
lukethedrifter
darjeeling sipping elite
Posts: 37260
Joined: October 17 06, 11:19 am
Location: Huis Clos

Re: movies

Post by lukethedrifter »

cardinalkarp wrote:"Sully" kinda sucked.
I haven't seen it yet but one of the complaints I read or heard was that it was Hero Pilot Guy versus Bad Big Government Bureaucrats aka FAA and pretty two dimensional. Still like to check it out.

User avatar
JoeMcKim
Perennial All-Star
Posts: 9248
Joined: September 8 09, 10:56 pm
Location: South County, St. Louis

Re: movies

Post by JoeMcKim »

I wouldn't say that Sully is a bad movie but not really a movie that requires seeing it in the theater. You don't lose that much from the viewing experience watching at home instead of the movie theater.

User avatar
ghostrunner
GOAT
Posts: 30869
Joined: April 18 06, 9:40 pm

Re: movies

Post by ghostrunner »

I can't for the life of me find a good reason why I'd want to see Sully. Seems like something that 20 years ago would have been a made for TV movie.

User avatar
Joe Shlabotnik
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 24290
Joined: October 12 06, 2:21 pm
Location: Baseball Ref Bullpen
Contact:

Re: movies

Post by Joe Shlabotnik »

lukethedrifter wrote:
cardinalkarp wrote:"Sully" kinda sucked.
I haven't seen it yet but one of the complaints I read or heard was that it was Hero Pilot Guy versus Bad Big Government Bureaucrats aka FAA and pretty two dimensional. Still like to check it out.
My wife and I saw this last week via Amazon. I rolled my eyes at that. No way the FAA would have been that confrontational. So I looked it up and, of course, libertarian Eastwood was making his point even though Sullenberger and FAA officials said it wasn't like that. It pissed me off.

But hey - the left has Michael Moore, the right has The Pale Rider.

User avatar
Famous Mortimer
Perennial All-Star
Posts: 3961
Joined: November 14 14, 5:23 am
Location: Cherokee

Re: movies

Post by Famous Mortimer »

ghostrunner wrote:I can't for the life of me find a good reason why I'd want to see Sully. Seems like something that 20 years ago would have been a made for TV movie.
As an outsider to the events (I remember the story, but I didn't really know the guy's name until the movie publicity started rolling out) I couldn't agree more.

User avatar
haltz
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 22630
Joined: November 9 06, 6:45 am
Location: a proud midwestern metropolis

Re: movies

Post by haltz »

Sully is better than I thought it would be. Basically because like everyone else I find Tom Hanks to be eminently watchable and it held my attention for 2 hours, more than I can say for most movies at this point.

User avatar
haltz
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 22630
Joined: November 9 06, 6:45 am
Location: a proud midwestern metropolis

Re: movies

Post by haltz »

My stepdad, a slim commercial airline captain in his sixties with white hair and a mustache, on the other hand, refuses to watch it and despises the name Sully.

User avatar
go birds
-go birds
Posts: 32057
Joined: February 5 10, 9:54 am

Re: movies

Post by go birds »

lol

User avatar
pioneer98
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 22007
Joined: July 15 08, 8:24 pm
Location: High A Minors

Re: movies

Post by pioneer98 »

Throwback: I went back and watched Escape From New York and Escape From L.A. over the holidays. I think I had only seen parts of Escape From New York in the past, and if so, it was a LOOOONG time ago. They both work great as parodies of action movies. They also work as kind of a satire of our country & politics of the last few decades. In that respect they arguably cut pretty close to the bone in some ways. Escape From New York is probably the better movie overall, but I thought Escape From L.A. was funnier and therefore more entertaining. The trailer for Escape From L.A. is just great:





Escape From L.A. is free to stream if you have Amazon Prime.

Post Reply