Did anyone actually think was going to happen?Michael wrote:Kudos to GRB for getting to the acceptance stage so fast.
Cardinals/Marlins Offseason Dance - Stanton Says Nope
- MinorLeagueGuy
- The Angst is Real
- Posts: 18447
- Joined: September 8 10, 2:57 pm
Re: Cardinals/Marlins Offseason Dance - aka Stanton Thread
- Schlich
- Don't tone police me bro!
- Posts: 10841
- Joined: July 1 06, 7:24 pm
- Location: Lost in the Cloud
Re: Cardinals/Marlins Offseason Dance - aka Stanton Thread
Michael wrote:Kudos to GRB for getting to the acceptance stage so fast.
lol.
I stopped getting my hopes up for big splashes when we couldn't aquire Randy Johnson in like 2003 and I was like 12.
- Farewell Friends
- Snayke's Bottomline
- Posts: 3888
- Joined: August 3 16, 9:44 am
Re: Cardinals/Marlins Offseason Dance - aka Stanton Thread
I was pretty convinced of it a couple weeks ago.MinorLeagueGuy wrote:Did anyone actually think was going to happen?Michael wrote:Kudos to GRB for getting to the acceptance stage so fast.
- MinorLeagueGuy
- The Angst is Real
- Posts: 18447
- Joined: September 8 10, 2:57 pm
Re: Cardinals/Marlins Offseason Dance - aka Stanton Thread
If we threw multiple versions of an offer, depending on the level of money we'd assume, out there and SF's package was still better I'd be a monkey's uncle. But I do wonder if any of the offers we floated had us taking on ALL the money..
- Farewell Friends
- Snayke's Bottomline
- Posts: 3888
- Joined: August 3 16, 9:44 am
Re: Cardinals/Marlins Offseason Dance - aka Stanton Thread
Okay. Those are certainly points. But Stanton and a full season of Bumgarner doesn't get them to 85 wins, much less 80.Popeye_Card wrote:Counterpoint. The Giants have won 3 World Series in the last 8 seasons, and made the playoffs more recently than the Cardinals.Farewell Friends wrote:The Giants lost 98 games and don't have a lot of room to grow. If Stanton approves, he's not prioritizing winning. If BG's tweet is right, time to move on.
They also have one of the top starting pitchers and the best catcher in the game.
Though I trust Bob Nightengale about as far as I can throw him.
-
Magneto2.0
- Hall Of Famer
- Posts: 18018
- Joined: June 16 07, 2:12 pm
Re: Cardinals/Marlins Offseason Dance - aka Stanton Thread
Why are y'all conceding again?
- MAGA
- All-Star
- Posts: 1323
- Joined: November 10 16, 10:22 am
Re: Cardinals/Marlins Offseason Dance - aka Stanton Thread
Acceptance is easy because we would be paying a guy into late-30s when we know it never works out. The team still needs to consolidate the depth and prospects into a single roster spot. Stanton move accomplishes this but there’s so much risk.
- ZigZagCardsFan
- Perennial All-Star
- Posts: 5526
- Joined: July 29 06, 6:26 pm
Re: Cardinals/Marlins Offseason Dance - aka Stanton Thread
Because Vegas set the odds at -250 that he was going to San Francisco.Magneto2.0 wrote:Why are y'all conceding again?
(Those aren't that great off odds, folks.)
- pioneer98
- Hall Of Famer
- Posts: 21995
- Joined: July 15 08, 8:24 pm
- Location: High A Minors
Re: Cardinals/Marlins Offseason Dance - aka Stanton Thread
IF the Giants get Stanton....The Giants to me look a lot like the Angels when Albert went there. Yes, there are differences. The Giants are probably in better shape right now than the Angels were then. And Stanton is younger than Albert was when he went to the Angels. But the Giants' stars are older (Trout was just 21 then, Bumgarner is 28 and Posey is 30). If the Giants get him, this is obviously a "win now" move. Bumgarner and Posey are free agents in the next few years. So I guess the hope is Stanton opts out after 3 years and then maybe it's time for a full rebuild? The thing about the Giants that reminds me most of the Angels is the Giants' lack of depth, and not many prospects on the horizon. It will be a couple star players, a handful of average players around them and then scrambling to plug holes with random guys. Maybe they trade Shark or Cueto for younger depth players, but those are players you generally keep when in "win now" mode. Another thing is that the Angels didn't have a team like the Dodgers in their division. I would not bet on the Giants overtaking the Dodgers even if they get Stanton and get rebounds from the players who had down seasons.Farewell Friends wrote:Okay. Those are certainly points. But Stanton and a full season of Bumgarner doesn't get them to 85 wins, much less 80.Popeye_Card wrote:Counterpoint. The Giants have won 3 World Series in the last 8 seasons, and made the playoffs more recently than the Cardinals.Farewell Friends wrote:The Giants lost 98 games and don't have a lot of room to grow. If Stanton approves, he's not prioritizing winning. If BG's tweet is right, time to move on.
They also have one of the top starting pitchers and the best catcher in the game.
Though I trust Bob Nightengale about as far as I can throw him.
-
Spider John
- Hall Of Famer
- Posts: 10930
- Joined: May 18 06, 10:09 pm
- Location: East of the middle of West Tennessee
Re: Cardinals/Marlins Offseason Dance - aka Stanton Thread
http://www.miamiherald.com/sports/spt-c ... 30273.htmlThe San Francisco Giants have offered second baseman Joe Panik and two prospects for Stanton and second baseman Dee Gordon, according to Sirius XM Radio’s Craig Mish.
The Miami Herald previously reported that the Marlins want to trade Stanton, Gordon and third baseman Martin Prado in an attempt to trim payroll from $115 million to $90 million.
According to Mish, the Giants are offering right-hander pitcher Tyler Beede and left-handed hitting outfielder/first baseman Chris Shaw, in addition to Panik, but the Giants want both Stanton and Gordon in return.




