Marcell Ozuna Watch - (Update: Traded to Cards Pg. 13)

Discuss all things Cardinals Baseball
Post Reply
TimChopsula
Veteran Player
Posts: 712
Joined: August 8 16, 10:48 pm

Re: Marcell Ozuna Watch - (Update: Traded to Cards Pg. 13)

Post by TimChopsula »

cardsfantx wrote:FWIW, matheny was just on MLBN and said there's possibly another bat coming soon (would assume matheny is kept in the loop)
Image

User avatar
cardinalkarp
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 18741
Joined: May 4 06, 8:44 am

Re: Marcell Ozuna Watch - (Update: Traded to Cards Pg. 13)

Post by cardinalkarp »

TimeForGuinness wrote:
Fat Strat wrote:Also, don't we have to give the Cards a ton of credit here? They had the winning offer for Stanton and he rejected it. But, the winning deal. The next significance piece that fell fell to us -- Ozuna.

Cards are doing what they had to do. Good job, Mo and Girsch.
I'll wait and see what we gave up, I have a fear we overpaid.
Didn't we kind of determine that was what they had to do at this point?

User avatar
go birds
-go birds
Posts: 32057
Joined: February 5 10, 9:54 am

Re: Marcell Ozuna Watch - (Update: Traded to Cards Pg. 13)

Post by go birds »

I'll consider it a win if we have finally moved on from grichuk

User avatar
a_smith
Perennial All-Star
Posts: 4561
Joined: September 20 06, 10:55 am

Re: Marcell Ozuna Watch - (Update: Traded to Cards Pg. 13)

Post by a_smith »

cardinalkarp wrote:
TimeForGuinness wrote:
Fat Strat wrote:Also, don't we have to give the Cards a ton of credit here? They had the winning offer for Stanton and he rejected it. But, the winning deal. The next significance piece that fell fell to us -- Ozuna.

Cards are doing what they had to do. Good job, Mo and Girsch.
I'll wait and see what we gave up, I have a fear we overpaid.
Didn't we kind of determine that was what they had to do at this point?
yup

Team is better now.

I am all for trading our surplus of 2win players. We grow them on trees.

TimeForGuinness
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 20007
Joined: April 18 06, 7:38 pm

Re: Marcell Ozuna Watch - (Update: Traded to Cards Pg. 13)

Post by TimeForGuinness »

cardinalkarp wrote:
TimeForGuinness wrote:
Fat Strat wrote:Also, don't we have to give the Cards a ton of credit here? They had the winning offer for Stanton and he rejected it. But, the winning deal. The next significance piece that fell fell to us -- Ozuna.

Cards are doing what they had to do. Good job, Mo and Girsch.
I'll wait and see what we gave up, I have a fear we overpaid.
Didn't we kind of determine that was what they had to do at this point?
Oh I know we overpaid, but I want to know by how much.

I still think Alcantara + Grichuk + low level pitching prospect get it done...but I'm reading Flaherty(or Hudson)/Alcantara/Grichuk

I'm really just curious.

User avatar
a_smith
Perennial All-Star
Posts: 4561
Joined: September 20 06, 10:55 am

Re: Marcell Ozuna Watch - (Update: Traded to Cards Pg. 13)

Post by a_smith »

go birds wrote:I'll consider it a win if we have finally moved on from grichuk
Yup

cardsfantx
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 12218
Joined: November 6 10, 10:58 am

Re: Marcell Ozuna Watch - (Update: Traded to Cards Pg. 13)

Post by cardsfantx »

cardinalkarp wrote:
TimeForGuinness wrote:
Fat Strat wrote:Also, don't we have to give the Cards a ton of credit here? They had the winning offer for Stanton and he rejected it. But, the winning deal. The next significance piece that fell fell to us -- Ozuna.

Cards are doing what they had to do. Good job, Mo and Girsch.
I'll wait and see what we gave up, I have a fear we overpaid.
Didn't we kind of determine that was what they had to do at this point?
no...

a package of alcantara (or flaherty) + a grichuk + hudson type of trade is fair for ozuna, and better than another team could/would offer

a package that includes alcantara AND flaherty is an overpay and unnecessary...no other team would have offered close to that

User avatar
MinorLeagueGuy
The Angst is Real
Posts: 18456
Joined: September 8 10, 2:57 pm

Re: Marcell Ozuna Watch - (Update: Traded to Cards Pg. 13)

Post by MinorLeagueGuy »

Great news. Now move Yadi down to 6th.

User avatar
cardinalkarp
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 18741
Joined: May 4 06, 8:44 am

Re: Marcell Ozuna Watch - (Update: Traded to Cards Pg. 13)

Post by cardinalkarp »

TimeForGuinness wrote:
cardinalkarp wrote:
TimeForGuinness wrote:
Fat Strat wrote:Also, don't we have to give the Cards a ton of credit here? They had the winning offer for Stanton and he rejected it. But, the winning deal. The next significance piece that fell fell to us -- Ozuna.

Cards are doing what they had to do. Good job, Mo and Girsch.
I'll wait and see what we gave up, I have a fear we overpaid.
Didn't we kind of determine that was what they had to do at this point?
Oh I know we overpaid, but I want to know by how much.

I still think Alcantara + Grichuk + low level pitching prospect get it done...but I'm reading Flaherty(or Hudson)/Alcantara/Grichuk

I'm really just curious.
Don't get me wrong....I am too. But enough of the Cards hoarding prospects, lets go out and get some guys that improve the team immediately.

They need to take some additional steps. I'll be very happy if they pick up Longoria/Colome...but if they can swing a Machado or Donaldson i'll be ecstatic.

User avatar
Hoot45
Perennial All-Star
Posts: 4008
Joined: October 8 14, 11:41 am

Re: Marcell Ozuna Watch - (Update: Traded to Cards Pg. 13)

Post by Hoot45 »

Just heard on ESPN radio that Alcantara is confirmed as part of the deal.

Post Reply