I can tell from the way he's holding his pick that he's figured something out with his curveball grip, again.Jocephus wrote:
"not worthy of its own thread" offseason thread
- MinorLeagueGuy
- The Angst is Real
- Posts: 18447
- Joined: September 8 10, 2:57 pm
Re: "not worthy of its own thread" offseason thread
- JoeMcKim
- Perennial All-Star
- Posts: 9248
- Joined: September 8 09, 10:56 pm
- Location: South County, St. Louis
Re: "not worthy of its own thread" offseason thread
I guess its a better offseason side project for him then last year when someone posted a trailed of Wainwright acting in a really terrible local independent movie.
- MinorLeagueGuy
- The Angst is Real
- Posts: 18447
- Joined: September 8 10, 2:57 pm
Re: "not worthy of its own thread" offseason thread
https://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2018/01/ ... arket.html
Not excited about this group. Wouldn't mind taking a look at Tony Watson. But we're stuck with Cecil.. I said I thought the market would've been jump started by Davis's deal. But that hasn't seemed to happen. Which tells me there's a Lot more sniffing around on the trade market for arms than has been mentioned.
Not excited about this group. Wouldn't mind taking a look at Tony Watson. But we're stuck with Cecil.. I said I thought the market would've been jump started by Davis's deal. But that hasn't seemed to happen. Which tells me there's a Lot more sniffing around on the trade market for arms than has been mentioned.
- MrCrowesGarden
- 'Burb Boy
- Posts: 24841
- Joined: July 9 06, 11:33 am
- Location: Out of the Loop
-
cardsfantx
- Hall Of Famer
- Posts: 11810
- Joined: November 6 10, 10:58 am
Re: "not worthy of its own thread" offseason thread
yuckMrCrowesGarden wrote:
the obv best upgrade left is donaldson, BUT if the jays are truly not going to trade donaldson...then i dunno
i may throw up on my keyboard, but i'd rather have LoMo on a 2-3 year deal and hope last year wasn't a fluke, then to get stuck with a 7/200 deal that boras is going to try and hold out for with hosmer
- Farewell Friends
- Snayke's Bottomline
- Posts: 3888
- Joined: August 3 16, 9:44 am
Re: "not worthy of its own thread" offseason thread
Hosmer isn't sniffing $150 million, let alone $200 million. He'll get something similar to Santana.
- MrCrowesGarden
- 'Burb Boy
- Posts: 24841
- Joined: July 9 06, 11:33 am
- Location: Out of the Loop
Re: "not worthy of its own thread" offseason thread
I think he’ll get more than Santana, but it won’t be $150 million. It’s probably around $100 million.
-
Magneto2.0
- Hall Of Famer
- Posts: 18018
- Joined: June 16 07, 2:12 pm
Re: "not worthy of its own thread" offseason thread
Cardinals are not giving Hosmer 200 million. At best we'll give him 5/100. I'm for it. It upgrades the team. And he's still young.cardsfantx wrote:yuckMrCrowesGarden wrote:
the obv best upgrade left is donaldson, BUT if the jays are truly not going to trade donaldson...then i dunno
i may throw up on my keyboard, but i'd rather have LoMo on a 2-3 year deal and hope last year wasn't a fluke, then to get stuck with a 7/200 deal that boras is going to try and hold out for with hosmer
-
cardsfantx
- Hall Of Famer
- Posts: 11810
- Joined: November 6 10, 10:58 am
Re: "not worthy of its own thread" offseason thread
he's getting a heck of a lot longer than 3 years being only 28...5-6 years min IMO...and i don't want him on a contract anywhere that long.Farewell Friends wrote:Hosmer isn't sniffing $150 million, let alone $200 million. He'll get something similar to Santana.
he signs a santana deal at 3/60? i'm game (though i'd rather have santana, but that ship has sailed)...but he's not going to sign for 3 years
-
cardsfantx
- Hall Of Famer
- Posts: 11810
- Joined: November 6 10, 10:58 am
Re: "not worthy of its own thread" offseason thread
so, would you do a deal for hosmer at 5/100?MrCrowesGarden wrote:I think he’ll get more than Santana, but it won’t be $150 million. It’s probably around $100 million.
i wouldn't...i'd sign LoMo at a fraction of that price for 2-3 years instead

