there's a lot dumb about itMagneto2.0 wrote:There's nothing dumb about adding Hosmer.
"not worthy of its own thread" offseason thread
- InvincibleCakeEater
- GRB's obsessive compulsive baseball poster
- Posts: 28256
- Joined: October 12 07, 12:28 pm
- Location: Raptured
Re: "not worthy of its own thread" offseason thread
- Tim
- Consider him admonished
- Posts: 8320
- Joined: March 25 15, 9:59 am
- Location: The South
Re: "not worthy of its own thread" offseason thread
Bernie’s article about Hosmer opened my eyes. I’m a hard pass on Hosmer.
- ZigZagCardsFan
- Perennial All-Star
- Posts: 5526
- Joined: July 29 06, 6:26 pm
-
Magneto2.0
- Hall Of Famer
- Posts: 18018
- Joined: June 16 07, 2:12 pm
Re: "not worthy of its own thread" offseason thread
Like?InvincibleCakeEater wrote:there's a lot dumb about itMagneto2.0 wrote:There's nothing dumb about adding Hosmer.
Obviously I’m talking about a realistic deal. Not 7 years but 4/80-100. I’m down even if we have to throw in a 5th year I’m not completely against it.
- Farewell Friends
- Snayke's Bottomline
- Posts: 3888
- Joined: August 3 16, 9:44 am
Re: "not worthy of its own thread" offseason thread
I'm wondering if the interest -- if it truly exists -- comes from the Cardinals thinking they can get Hosmer to change his swing just enough that he elevates the ball more. As is, only two players hit a lower percentage of fly balls than Hosmer, but it's clear the power is there. I don't know. Hosmer at his worst, like 2016 and 2014, is a bad player. It would be an expensive gamble.
- MinorLeagueGuy
- The Angst is Real
- Posts: 18447
- Joined: September 8 10, 2:57 pm
Re: "not worthy of its own thread" offseason thread
I cringe when I hear about swing changes. I know its been done. But that's also a huge gamble.
- Swirls
- gone fission
- Posts: 8299
- Joined: December 11 07, 4:15 pm
- Location: South Korea
Re: "not worthy of its own thread" offseason thread
I'm sure every hitting coach that has worked with Jason Heyward has said the same thing.Farewell Friends wrote:I'm wondering if the interest -- if it truly exists -- comes from the Cardinals thinking they can get Hosmer to change his swing just enough that he elevates the ball more. As is, only two players hit a lower percentage of fly balls than Hosmer, but it's clear the power is there. I don't know. Hosmer at his worst, like 2016 and 2014, is a bad player. It would be an expensive gamble.
- Farewell Friends
- Snayke's Bottomline
- Posts: 3888
- Joined: August 3 16, 9:44 am
Re: "not worthy of its own thread" offseason thread
Probably, but Hosmer's mechanics aren't as funky. I just don't buy that he has turned a corner.
- CardsofSTL
- All Hail the GDT Master
- Posts: 65027
- Joined: April 26 11, 6:06 am
- Location: Columbus, OH
Re: "not worthy of its own thread" offseason thread
I'd prefer they not sign Hosmer or Moose; unless it was to a one year deal. I know it probably won't happen; but I would rather they spend the money next offseason on one of the big free agents like Machado. Signing one of these guys to a multi-year deal this offseason effectively gives them an out from being competitive in next offseason's bidding war.
That; plus the fact that Hosmer doesn't really get us there. Donaldson for a year; or someone else that won't break the bank; makes more sense to me.
That; plus the fact that Hosmer doesn't really get us there. Donaldson for a year; or someone else that won't break the bank; makes more sense to me.
- ZigZagCardsFan
- Perennial All-Star
- Posts: 5526
- Joined: July 29 06, 6:26 pm





