Marcell Ozuna Watch - (Update: Traded to Cards Pg. 13)

Discuss all things Cardinals Baseball
Post Reply
User avatar
Big Amoco Sign
Master of Hyperbole
Posts: 14398
Joined: December 1 17, 11:05 am

Re: Marcell Ozuna Watch - (Update: Traded to Cards Pg. 13)

Post by Big Amoco Sign »

phins wrote: ↑
January 25 18, 1:37 pm
Of all the top chips we had in the upper minors, Alcantara was the one I was happy to see go. His archetype just has such a variance in track record.

Connor Greene, for instance, is not a large amount away from Alcantara as far as prospects go.
No way you still feel this way.

I’m curious what you didn’t like about Sandy. He was gas at age 20.

phins
Sobbing quietly during Fox programming
Posts: 12085
Joined: June 9 06, 3:51 pm

Re: Marcell Ozuna Watch - (Update: Traded to Cards Pg. 13)

Post by phins »

Big Amoco Sign wrote: ↑
April 20 22, 8:50 am
phins wrote: ↑
January 25 18, 1:37 pm
Of all the top chips we had in the upper minors, Alcantara was the one I was happy to see go. His archetype just has such a variance in track record.

Connor Greene, for instance, is not a large amount away from Alcantara as far as prospects go.
No way you still feel this way.

I’m curious what you didn’t like about Sandy. He was gas at age 20.
Nope. Of course not. I got that one way wrong and own it all the time.

I sort of answered this question in my original comment, but his archetype has a huge swatch of variance and on the looks I had of him I hated his command and didn't think he would progress it to this point.

It's not so much being "gas" that clicked with him. There are literally hundreds of pitchers who throw as hard as he does. It was the athleticism allowing him to develop command and he improved his breaking pitch from a meh offering that hitters spit on because he never threw it for a strike to one he commands and plays off of.

He reached his 90th percentile outcome and because of it I was way wrong.

phins
Sobbing quietly during Fox programming
Posts: 12085
Joined: June 9 06, 3:51 pm

Re: Marcell Ozuna Watch - (Update: Traded to Cards Pg. 13)

Post by phins »

I thought Alcantara would be a reliever because of his command.

User avatar
Big Amoco Sign
Master of Hyperbole
Posts: 14398
Joined: December 1 17, 11:05 am

Re: Marcell Ozuna Watch - (Update: Traded to Cards Pg. 13)

Post by Big Amoco Sign »

phins wrote: ↑
April 20 22, 9:56 am
I thought Alcantara would be a reliever because of his command.
I admittedly did too, but I thought he'd be a mainstay reliever of the Chapman/Diaz mold. One that sticks for 6-8 years. And those are valuable too.

I didn't like losing him because I love having as many 99+ arms as possible. I know many throw hard without command but you can't have too many. One of them is bound to get coached up to potential. We may be late on Hicks, but kind of hoping he comes around and it clicks. Especially since the TJS is out of the way and he has a set path.

Regarding Ozuna, I was okay with the trade. Never cared for Sierra or thought he had any real future outside of a Terrance Gore pinch runner for a playoff team.

dmarx114
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 25482
Joined: December 20 07, 2:45 pm

Re: Marcell Ozuna Watch - (Update: Traded to Cards Pg. 13)

Post by dmarx114 »

MrCrowesGarden wrote: ↑
December 14 17, 10:16 am
It’s a heist.
I thought it was a great trade as well. But there are plenty of times when giving up prospects is a mistake.

User avatar
MrCrowesGarden
'Burb Boy
Posts: 24841
Joined: July 9 06, 11:33 am
Location: Out of the Loop

Re: Marcell Ozuna Watch - (Update: Traded to Cards Pg. 13)

Post by MrCrowesGarden »

It's the exception, I can live with it

User avatar
MrCrowesGarden
'Burb Boy
Posts: 24841
Joined: July 9 06, 11:33 am
Location: Out of the Loop

Re: Marcell Ozuna Watch - (Update: Traded to Cards Pg. 13)

Post by MrCrowesGarden »

Also LOL at this trade being the one that broke y’all’s brains.

AWvsCBsteeeerike3
"I could totally eat a pig butt, if smoked correctly!"
Posts: 27578
Joined: August 5 08, 11:24 am
Location: Thinking of the Children

Re: Marcell Ozuna Watch - (Update: Traded to Cards Pg. 13)

Post by AWvsCBsteeeerike3 »

Didn't find it in this thread, but pretty sure I'm on record somewhere on here agreeing with phins.

Saw Alcantara a time or two live. He looked the part. Tall, lanky, loose, decent velocity. But, his command was terrible, he didn't fool hitters, and in general looked like a thrower more than a pitcher.

That's obviously changed. Good for him.

Post Reply