Horrible umpires

Discuss all things Cardinals Baseball
Post Reply
Birdfan57
Veteran Player
Posts: 781
Joined: July 4 18, 4:20 pm
Location: California

Re: Horrible umpires

Post by Birdfan57 »

Big Amoco Sign wrote:
July 18 22, 10:20 am
CardsofSTL wrote:
July 18 22, 10:00 am
Well...my point although not well made admittedly was that there is precedence for having certain umpires designated as plate umpires and others as base umpires,
Right yeah, oh well, only a few more months and we'll never have home plate ball/strike umps again.
Ridiculous ball being called a strike in the Phils-Marlins game yesterday. Was being heckled from the Miami dugout and never looked over there because he knew he was wrong.

Bring on the robots calling balls and strikes.

User avatar
ghostrunner
GOAT
Posts: 30807
Joined: April 18 06, 9:40 pm

Re: Horrible umpires

Post by ghostrunner »

Big Amoco Sign wrote:
July 18 22, 10:20 am
CardsofSTL wrote:
July 18 22, 10:00 am
Well...my point although not well made admittedly was that there is precedence for having certain umpires designated as plate umpires and others as base umpires,
Right yeah, oh well, only a few more months and we'll never have home plate ball/strike umps again.
Doesn't this start in 2024?

User avatar
Big Amoco Sign
Master of Hyperbole
Posts: 14398
Joined: December 1 17, 11:05 am

Re: Horrible umpires

Post by Big Amoco Sign »

ghostrunner wrote:
July 18 22, 11:55 am
Big Amoco Sign wrote:
July 18 22, 10:20 am
CardsofSTL wrote:
July 18 22, 10:00 am
Well...my point although not well made admittedly was that there is precedence for having certain umpires designated as plate umpires and others as base umpires,
Right yeah, oh well, only a few more months and we'll never have home plate ball/strike umps again.
Doesn't this start in 2024?
You're correct. I thought since it was in AAA already, that it was ready.

I guess it's not for a couple years. Geeze, WHY? lol

User avatar
sighyoung
Mayor of GRB
Posts: 38603
Joined: April 17 06, 7:42 pm
Location: Louisville

Re: Horrible umpires

Post by sighyoung »


User avatar
Famous Mortimer
Perennial All-Star
Posts: 3955
Joined: November 14 14, 5:23 am
Location: Cherokee

Re: Horrible umpires

Post by Famous Mortimer »

Birdfan57 wrote:
June 11 22, 3:48 pm
CardsofSTL wrote:
June 11 22, 2:37 am
Birdfan57 wrote:
June 9 22, 3:34 pm

Talking about horrible umpiring, did Angel Hernandez retire or go on a long vacation? Haven't heard anything about him screwing up calls for a few weeks now.
Oh give me a bleeping break. He can not be serious. If he had 1 more eye he'd be a cyclops.
He knows his "case" has absolutely zero merit. MLB told him they don't think he's good enough to ump WS games but can't fire him, so he just keeps up the meaningless legal cases to annoy them.

User avatar
AdmiralKird
MBA, CPA, CFA, CFP, JD, PE, MD
Posts: 10173
Joined: March 7 07, 4:50 pm
Location: Tycho Crater, Luna

Re: Horrible umpires

Post by AdmiralKird »

Can you challenge the count at the plate, or does that fall under "you can't review balls and strikes."

User avatar
Kincaid
Veteran Player
Posts: 654
Joined: June 15 09, 11:03 am

Re: Horrible umpires

Post by Kincaid »

The ball-strike count is considered a matter of record-keeping, which can be challenged.

User avatar
Joe Shlabotnik
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 24253
Joined: October 12 06, 2:21 pm
Location: Baseball Ref Bullpen
Contact:

Re: Horrible umpires

Post by Joe Shlabotnik »

Kincaid wrote:
August 16 22, 2:54 pm
The ball-strike count is considered a matter of record-keeping, which can be challenged.
Right- why isn't the official score keeper getting involved?

Jocephus
99% conan clips
Posts: 64992
Joined: April 18 06, 5:14 pm

Re: Horrible umpires

Post by Jocephus »

MLB Umpires Association, adamant that crews are simply upholding rule, address home-plate collision rule in statement
https://www.espn.com/mlb/story/_/id/344 ... -statement

AWvsCBsteeeerike3
"I could totally eat a pig butt, if smoked correctly!"
Posts: 27563
Joined: August 5 08, 11:24 am
Location: Thinking of the Children

Re: Horrible umpires

Post by AWvsCBsteeeerike3 »

Jocephus wrote:
August 18 22, 6:33 am
MLB Umpires Association, adamant that crews are simply upholding rule, address home-plate collision rule in statement
https://www.espn.com/mlb/story/_/id/344 ... -statement
The more I've paid attention, the easier this rule is. People complaining about the 'trickiness' (eg, Hedges in the article) of it are just belly-aching.

It's maybe a bit different than what he was taught growing up. Maybe.

The video can be found at this link. https://www.mlb.com/news/austin-hedges- ... urned-call

Go to the 14-15 second mark.

Keep in mind the foul line is an extension of back angle of the plate. Hedges sets up with his left leg over the line and between the runner and home. Hence, no lane is given. Worse he reaches back across his body and catches the ball to the right of his right shoulder. So, he can't argue the act of fielding the ball caused him to block the lane.

This one is solely on Hedges for setting up incorrectly, imo. Or on the Guardians for teaching him to set up incorrectly.

It's pretty simple. Put the left foot on the front left corner of the plate (the corner closest to 3B/Pitchers mound). The right foot is in fair territory. A lane is given to the back/middle of the plate. Receive the ball and apply the tag. Hedges is, what, maybe a foot or 18" 'left' of there. Sure, its a small difference, but the same 'tricky' rule kept him from being lit the [expletive] up by the runner as he almost surely would have been 10 years ago.

And, if there's any question as to rather or not he didn't provide a lane, look at the path the runner took. Or the angle from the 3B dugout.

Having said all that, I will go back to my original point that it's not tricky. Perhaps it is tricky. Same as most all of baseball.

Post Reply