Hampton out for season.
- Cronos
- In perpetuum
- Posts: 34778
- Joined: June 30 06, 7:49 am
- Location: St. Louis
Re: Hampton out for season.
The other two of the once "big 3" certainly haven't been too healthy since leaving Oakland, so it would certainly make sense.whyhellothere wrote:Why do I get the feeling that 7 years from now they are going to be saying the same thing about Zito?Leroy wrote: The 34-year-old Hampton has failed to meet expectations since signing a $121 million, eight-year contract with Colorado before the 2001 season.
- JL21
- NPR & THT Contributor
- Posts: 36109
- Joined: April 18 06, 7:44 am
- Location: Chocolate City
Re: Hampton out for season.
At the time of Hampton's deal, he'd been rock solid in terms of staying healthy as well. He'd rattled off four years in a row of 32+ starts and hadn't had any serious arm problems. And unlike Zito, Hampton's peripherals were stable/going in the right direction at the time of the deal.TimmyG wrote:Barry Zito is rock solid when it comes to staying healthy. I think he'll be alright in that aspect. He should still be considered overpaid, but I wouldn't compare it to as bad of a contract as Hampton got.
In short, I think the Hampton deal- bad as it's turned out- can make a better case for itself than the Zito deal.
-
greenback44
- Hall Of Famer
- Posts: 11664
- Joined: June 26 06, 8:54 pm
- Location: In a Small Town with Jack and Diane

