Michael Vick

The forum for ranting, raving, complaining and praising
Post Reply
User avatar
Cronos
In perpetuum
Posts: 34778
Joined: June 30 06, 7:49 am
Location: St. Louis

Re: Michael Vick

Post by Cronos »

Magneto2.0 wrote:If you eat any food that contains animals , you hunt, or anything that involves the killing of animals and you're trying to condemn Michael Vick, you're a hypocrite.
So abusing animals and treating them inhumanely(an assumption I'm making from some of the videos) then killing them if they should happen to lose is the same as raising and killing animals for food?

Simbagal23
All-Star
Posts: 1949
Joined: March 7 07, 7:55 am

Re: Michael Vick

Post by Simbagal23 »

Magneto2.0 wrote:If you eat any food that contains animals , you hunt, or anything that involves the killing of animals and you're trying to condemn Michael Vick, you're a hypocrite.
Hmmmm....except eating meat isn't a felony. Participating in dog fighting is a felony in the state of Virginia. And I think people are referring to Vick's overall issues (Ron Mexico, airport water bottle incident, et al), not just this particular issue. IMO

Socnorb11
The Last Word
Posts: 21909
Joined: June 21 06, 8:45 am

Re: Michael Vick

Post by Socnorb11 »

Magneto2.0 wrote:If you eat any food that contains animals , you hunt, or anything that involves the killing of animals and you're trying to condemn Michael Vick, you're a hypocrite.

I think it's the manner in which the dogs are destroyed, and the reason............those are the issues.

Killing an animal with a gun to eat is quite a bit different than selling tickets to watch two dogs maul each other, and then drowning (or worse) the weak ones.

User avatar
Bo Hart
Perennial All-Star
Posts: 8770
Joined: April 14 06, 9:50 pm

Re: Michael Vick

Post by Bo Hart »

Radio_Bugtussle wrote:
TimmyG wrote:I want him playing for the Rams.

I don't really care what he does off the field if it has nothing to do with football. He's a good player.
Good FB player?

And Aaron Miles is an all star shortstop. :?

Michael Vick is an official laughingstock for Chiefs fans everywhere. KC stopped him cold with a mediocre d-line, three slow LB's and a very, very suspect secondary. He got laughed out of Arrowhead in '04.

He's almost as good at being a well-adjusted human as he is at quarterbacking.
Michael Vick is undoubtedly one of the most overrated players in the game. It's one thing to say that he's not superstar, but to liken him to Aaron Miles?

And you're saying he's a joke because he played poorly against the Cheifs? Well, in that case, Larry Johnson is also laughingstock. He ran for 32 yards against the Colts. Yes, that's right, the Indianapolis Colts. The same Colts that gave up an average of 173 rushing yards per game in the regular season. Quite frankly, I don't see how he still has a job. He'll probably be beat out by a hip-less Priest Holmes this pre-season.

User avatar
Bo Hart
Perennial All-Star
Posts: 8770
Joined: April 14 06, 9:50 pm

Re: Michael Vick

Post by Bo Hart »

Magneto2.0 wrote:If you eat any food that contains animals , you hunt, or anything that involves the killing of animals and you're trying to condemn Michael Vick, you're a hypocrite.
You cannot possibly compare electrocuting a dog because it did poorly in a fight to killing another animal for food.

User avatar
heyzeus
Everday Unicorn
Posts: 43331
Joined: April 21 06, 10:14 am
Location: Austin, TX

Re: Michael Vick

Post by heyzeus »

Socnorb11 wrote:
Magneto2.0 wrote:If you eat any food that contains animals , you hunt, or anything that involves the killing of animals and you're trying to condemn Michael Vick, you're a hypocrite.

I think it's the manner in which the dogs are destroyed, and the reason............those are the issues.

Killing an animal with a gun to eat is quite a bit different than selling tickets to watch two dogs maul each other, and then drowning (or worse) the weak ones.
Or slamming a dog repeatedly against the ground until it's dead, or electrocuting it until it is dead. Just for your own entertainment.

Hunting and food production are not carried out in this manner. Nor are they carried out for the purpose of having two animals fight to a painful bloody death for our entertainment.

User avatar
arnie.k
All-Star
Posts: 1261
Joined: August 3 06, 7:40 am
Location: is everything...

Re: Michael Vick

Post by arnie.k »

Magneto2.0 wrote:If you eat any food that contains animals , you hunt, or anything that involves the killing of animals and you're trying to condemn Michael Vick, you're a hypocrite.

i answered this claim on the second page of this thread, but i don't mind quoting myself again:
arnie.k wrote:dude, i can't condone killing animals for any reason (food, clothing, etc), and i won't. but, that doesn't mean there aren't levels of "badness" to this.

killing an animal so you can eat it < killing an animal so you can have a nice purse < killing an animal for no good reason < killing an animal in a cruel manner for no good reason

the scale i measure it on is respect. you gotta treat these animals with respect, even if you intend to eat them. inhumane treatment of a living animal is to me much much worse eating an animal. and cruelty for the sake of "sport" is just inexcusable.

User avatar
omaha_red
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 12963
Joined: April 18 06, 7:53 am
Location: toning it done

Re: Michael Vick

Post by omaha_red »

Magneto2.0 wrote:If you eat any food that contains animals , you hunt, or anything that involves the killing of animals and you're trying to condemn Michael Vick, you're a hypocrite.

your real name isn't "Deion Sanders" is it??

User avatar
ghostrunner
GOAT
Posts: 30869
Joined: April 18 06, 9:40 pm

Re: Michael Vick

Post by ghostrunner »

Magneto2.0 wrote:If you eat any food that contains animals , you hunt, or anything that involves the killing of animals and you're trying to condemn Michael Vick, you're a hypocrite.
So are you a vegetarian, or do you condone dog-fighting?

User avatar
docellis
America's Most Beloved Twitter Joke Thief
Posts: 24741
Joined: April 18 06, 6:54 pm

Re: Michael Vick

Post by docellis »

I don't know if I should make this a separate rant or not but it relates to this topic.

I HATE FOX NEWS.

I HATE THAT FOX NEWS IS ALWAYS ON TWO OF THE EIGHT TELEVISIONS IN MY GYM'S CARDIO ROOM.

I HATE THAT THEY FLASHED HORRIBLE, HORRIBLE, HORRIBLE video of dogs attacking each other on the tv next to the game I was trying to watch.

I hate that they attempt to be some moral bastion - yet - that channel shows more images of Lindsay and Paris and Britney than any of the other 6 channels (*INCLUDING MTV and VH1*) and I hate that there must be enough people wanting to watch that channel that it must be on two televisions.

Post Reply