docellis wrote:If you had to engage in this transaction would you rather pay someone or be paid?
If I charged I am afraid they would demand a refund!!!!!!
docellis wrote:If you had to engage in this transaction would you rather pay someone or be paid?
It's on Rangeline close to 70. There aren't any signs for it, and I don't think you can see it from the highway.RC21* wrote:Is it that massage parlor on the east side of town, the one you pass on 70 on the way into Columbia?
I agree that they probably get paid good money (at least the Vivid girls), but it's probably not so much about the money with many of them, but the fact that Uncle Fred and the entire junior varsity swim team got fresh with them when they were 13... which is probably why they're in the industry to begin with.haltz wrote:I thought it was at least more than that as well, from what I've gathered. More like $500. My buddy sent me a link to an escort review site, and there's an entire section on porn stars that "provide". It's hysterical. There's no way that the girls that work for a company like Vivid make that little money.
Not to start anything, but how do you connect homosexuality to either the porn industry, or more insultingly, likelihood of suicidal tendencies? I totally agree that the adult entertainment industry is nutzo (having now lived with a stripper, unwillingly, on two separate occasions), but I have to contest your statement. I would strongly assert that greatly more women in the industry, for lack of a better term, get their gay on for the camera, even if it's staged. The gay porn industry is big (snicker) but it's not 90% big (snicker). And to assert that homosexuals are more prone to suicide, frankly, is so 1970s.GatewaySnayke wrote:There was some porn chick on "Red Eye" last week who was complaining about free porn and how they are all losing a lot of money. I thought she was going to break down over it.
But it doesn't even make sense. Is it worth it to have all these pictures and videos on the Internet for eternity for a measly $200 bucks? There's seriously something you couldn't find better than engaging in porn?
You're right though, pebbles, that's a screwed up industry. Between all of the disease, the fact that 90 percent of the males are gay and the low pay, I'm surprised the suicide rate isn't higher.
Seriously, a lot of them do it because they make more money hooking if they bill themselves as a porn star.GatewaySnayke wrote:But it doesn't even make sense. Is it worth it to have all these pictures and videos on the Internet for eternity for a measly $200 bucks? There's seriously something you couldn't find better than engaging in porn?
A lot of the guys in straight porn have to get there via the gay porn industry. Some who claim to be straight by preference end up in gay porn because it pays better. It's really not that hard to imagine these guys have some suicidal tendencies.Maclowery wrote:Not to start anything, but how do you connect homosexuality to either the porn industry, or more insultingly, likelihood of suicidal tendencies? I totally agree that the adult entertainment industry is nutzo (having now lived with a stripper, unwillingly, on two separate occasions), but I have to contest your statement. I would strongly assert that greatly more women in the industry, for lack of a better term, get their gay on for the camera, even if it's staged. The gay porn industry is big (snicker) but it's not 90% big (snicker). And to assert that homosexuals are more prone to suicide, frankly, is so 1970s.
That's what the robots will be for.RC21* wrote:There's a huge sociological theory that prostitution is good for society because it provides an outlet for sexual deviance. I wish I could elaborate more but it's been awhile since I've read it. Interested parties can learn more from Ned Polsky's "Hustlers, Beats, and Others".UK wrote:Legalize it.
People are definitely more sexually repressed here compared to Europe and part of the reason is the taboo that still surrounds sex.