The US Air Force

The forum for ranting, raving, complaining and praising
User avatar
docellis
America's Most Beloved Twitter Joke Thief
Posts: 24741
Joined: April 18 06, 6:54 pm

The US Air Force

Post by docellis »

I'm not super politcal but I'm angry that the Air Force would choose a French company over Boeing for any contract - much less one of this size.

User avatar
G. Keenan
Sucking on the Rally Nipple
Posts: 23718
Joined: April 16 06, 6:03 pm
Location: Chicago

Re: The US Air Force

Post by G. Keenan »

Meh, the US military contracts stuff out to foreign companies all the time.

User avatar
Leroy
a bad penny always turns up
Posts: 25228
Joined: April 17 06, 12:27 pm
Location: Hanging out with my redneck, white socks and Blue Ribbon beer.
Contact:

Re: The US Air Force

Post by Leroy »

I just (fake) argued this with my brother last weekend. He was really mad about it, especially considering the fact that he will be flying on them.

He said that the Boeings are awesome and the others are pieces of crap.

I argued just to make conversation for about a half hour and lost interest.

It don't matter. Boeing shouldn't fly an American flag...they get plenty of stuff from somewhere else. But it makes the politicians look good.

User avatar
G. Keenan
Sucking on the Rally Nipple
Posts: 23718
Joined: April 16 06, 6:03 pm
Location: Chicago

Re: The US Air Force

Post by G. Keenan »

I suspect the Airforce picked Airbus because it was the better choice. If that's the case Boeing should get their act together and do better next time.

User avatar
docellis
America's Most Beloved Twitter Joke Thief
Posts: 24741
Joined: April 18 06, 6:54 pm

Re: The US Air Force

Post by docellis »

.
Last edited by docellis on June 4 08, 9:17 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
G. Keenan
Sucking on the Rally Nipple
Posts: 23718
Joined: April 16 06, 6:03 pm
Location: Chicago

Re: The US Air Force

Post by G. Keenan »

docellis wrote:The Air Force should make bad choices so we have more jobs.
Aren't the planes being built in Alabama?

Michael
GRB Founder
Posts: 35304
Joined: December 31 69, 6:00 pm
Location: Chicago, IL
Contact:

Re: The US Air Force

Post by Michael »

G. Keenan wrote:I suspect the Airforce picked Airbus because it was the better choice. If that's the case Boeing should get their act together and do better next time.

It was a shocking choice because Boeings plane was widely considered better. In fact, the air force changed their spec to fit the needs of the Airbus design.

User avatar
G. Keenan
Sucking on the Rally Nipple
Posts: 23718
Joined: April 16 06, 6:03 pm
Location: Chicago

Re: The US Air Force

Post by G. Keenan »

Michael wrote:
G. Keenan wrote:I suspect the Airforce picked Airbus because it was the better choice. If that's the case Boeing should get their act together and do better next time.

It was a shocking choice because Boeings plane was widely considered better. In fact, the air force changed their spec to fit the needs of the Airbus design.
Was it a production issue then? I haven't really read up on this issue, but could Airbus deliver them faster or something? I'm proceeding from the assumption that the Airforce people who made this decision aren't idiots. Of course some kind of bribery could be involved.

User avatar
Radbird
There's someone in my head but it's not me
Posts: 62390
Joined: April 18 06, 5:08 pm
Location: LF Bleachers @ Busch II

Re: The US Air Force

Post by Radbird »

Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR) are very clear on this subject.

http://www.acquisition.gov/far/current/ ... 025_1.html

TimeForGuinness
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 20007
Joined: April 18 06, 7:38 pm

Re: The US Air Force

Post by TimeForGuinness »

You're taxpayer dollars at work.........in France.

BTW, the unions are pissed because all of the workers in Mobile will be non-union workers.

Post Reply