jim wrote:
And I don't know if it is just baseball popeye. I've heard raves about PNC from every person that has been there, and similiarly with Comerica. I've never had a bad seat at Wrigley, and the one time I went to Fenway as close as I was to the field those would be labeled box seats at B3 (they were not box at Fenway).
Keep in mind the economic factors for each of these cases.
PNC is very nice (I've been there), but it seats only 38,000. Seats are cheap and there are few "premium" areas because there is very little demand for Pirates tickets. They support a payroll of less than $50 million. If the Cardinals stink for nearly 20 years and slash payroll, we could have a nice affordable park like this too.
It costs $36 to sit in the Wrigley bleachers now for "regular games". Given, because of the history or whatever, those are "prime seats", but their prices across the board are higher than Busch, and wheels are already in motion to "modernize" Wrigley in terms of advertising, etc.
Fenway has the highest average ticket prices in the majors. They keep sticking premium seating anywhere they can. First they glassed in the area behind home plate. Then seats on the Monster. Then the roof deck seats. I'm sure more and more advertising will find it's way into Fenway too.
I don't think Busch III is the best ballpark in the majors. I think the seating and pricing sucks, and I rarely go to games anymore. But I realize that's the nature of the beast. You can't just build a Fenway or Wrigley and suddenly have 90+ years of tradition. Baseball is too popular in St. Louis to build a PNC. If the Cardinals have a $100 million payroll, they have to make that money somehow. Do the average fans get squeezed? Of course. But it's not all bad--with HD, watching games for free at home gets better and better each year.