Dark Knight

The forum for ranting, raving, complaining and praising
Post Reply
User avatar
thrill
bronoun enthusiast
Posts: 30539
Joined: April 14 06, 10:45 pm
Location: barely online

Re: Dark Knight

Post by thrill »

TimeForGuinness wrote:
clevername wrote:I know it's not the common stance on this, but I think Gyllenhall's more attractive.

There, I said it.
I'm with you
What's it like being blind? I hear your hearing is redonk.

User avatar
Popeye_Card
GRB's most intelligent & humble poster
Posts: 31085
Joined: April 17 06, 11:25 am

Re: Dark Knight

Post by Popeye_Card »

TimeForGuinness wrote:
clevername wrote:I know it's not the common stance on this, but I think Gyllenhall's more attractive.

There, I said it.
I'm with you
I'm on board. Katie is attractive enough, but kinda plain. Maggie looks more "interesting". I think it's the eyes, and the kinda weird smile.

TimeForGuinness
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 20007
Joined: April 18 06, 7:38 pm

Re: Dark Knight

Post by TimeForGuinness »

thrill wrote:
TimeForGuinness wrote:
clevername wrote:I know it's not the common stance on this, but I think Gyllenhall's more attractive.

There, I said it.
I'm with you
What's it like being blind? I hear your hearing is redonk.
hey now...i dunno why...but there is just something about Maggie that is just really attractive

User avatar
clevername
Bringer of FRBG
Posts: 10380
Joined: April 16 06, 7:13 pm
Location: Alabama

Re: Dark Knight

Post by clevername »

that's what I never get about this comparison. I can see people finding Holmes more attractive, that's fine. I don't get all the people who exclaim that Gyllenhall's just flat out ugly and seemingly doing it regardless of the comparison.

And that was around before the whole Dark Knight thing came about.

User avatar
ThatGuy
Perennial All-Star
Posts: 5114
Joined: October 15 06, 4:40 pm
Location: Knoxville, TN

Re: Dark Knight

Post by ThatGuy »

The jowls are sorta weird looking to me.

Michael
GRB Founder
Posts: 35304
Joined: December 31 69, 6:00 pm
Location: Chicago, IL
Contact:

Re: Dark Knight

Post by Michael »

TimeForGuinness wrote:
clevername wrote:I know it's not the common stance on this, but I think Gyllenhall's more attractive.

There, I said it.
I'm with you

Madness.

User avatar
ghostrunner
GOAT
Posts: 30870
Joined: April 18 06, 9:40 pm

Re: Dark Knight

Post by ghostrunner »

It's not that I find Katie Holmes unattractive, but she's not a very good actress IMO and that always brings a movie down.

User avatar
JL21
NPR & THT Contributor
Posts: 36109
Joined: April 18 06, 7:44 am
Location: Chocolate City

Re: Dark Knight

Post by JL21 »

I prefer Maggie, if we're doing the "Who's hotter?" thing. But that's primarily for two reasons.

1. Katie Holmes = married to Tom Cruise

2. Maggie runs circles around Katie Holmes as an actress

On the big, bad list of 50 actresses I'd most like to do the worm with, neither would be on the list.

User avatar
OmahaCard79
Veteran Player
Posts: 1101
Joined: May 23 06, 1:02 pm

Re: Dark Knight

Post by OmahaCard79 »

Maggie is odd to me. Look at her pics on imdb. Sometimes, she looks really attractive to me. Other times, even in red carpet pics, she looks really, really, really bad.

FWIW, I think she looked really good in TDK.

User avatar
InvincibleCakeEater
GRB's obsessive compulsive baseball poster
Posts: 28275
Joined: October 12 07, 12:28 pm
Location: Raptured

Re: Dark Knight

Post by InvincibleCakeEater »

TimeForGuinness wrote:
thrill wrote:
TimeForGuinness wrote:
clevername wrote:I know it's not the common stance on this, but I think Gyllenhall's more attractive.

There, I said it.
I'm with you
What's it like being blind? I hear your hearing is redonk.
hey now...i dunno why...but there is just something about Maggie that is just really attractive
I think it's because she looks like Jake

Post Reply