Lance Armstrong needs some attention

stlouie_lipp · Post by **stlouie_lipp** » September 9 08, 8:05 pm

I'm sorry, but I really think this guy is a phoney-baloney.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080910/ap_ ... omeback_21

ghostrunner · Post by **ghostrunner** » September 10 08, 7:44 am

stlouie_lipp wrote:I'm sorry, but I really think this guy is a phoney-baloney.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080910/ap_ ... omeback_21

Huh?

AWvsCBsteeeerike3 · Post by **AWvsCBsteeeerike3** » September 10 08, 9:06 am

LAnce Armstrong = badass

3% chance of beating cancer and not only did he do it, but he also trained through it. If he doesn't deserve some spotlight, I don't know who does....and that's ignoring all the charity work and fundraising he does.

cardsfansince82 · Post by **cardsfansince82** » September 10 08, 9:30 am

AWvsCBsteeeerike3 wrote: 3% chance of beating cancer

Not to diminish anything he has accomplished, but this isn't accurate.

AWvsCBsteeeerike3 · Post by **AWvsCBsteeeerike3** » September 10 08, 9:45 am

cardsfansince82 wrote:
AWvsCBsteeeerike3 wrote: 3% chance of beating cancer
Not to diminish anything he has accomplished, but this isn't accurate.

Really? i heard it on ESPN, so that doesn't surprise me.....

cardsfansince82 · Post by **cardsfansince82** » September 10 08, 9:55 am

AWvsCBsteeeerike3 wrote:
cardsfansince82 wrote:
AWvsCBsteeeerike3 wrote: 3% chance of beating cancer
Not to diminish anything he has accomplished, but this isn't accurate.

Really? i heard it on ESPN, so that doesn't surprise me.....

With something like cancer there is no way you could put that specific of a number on it. FWIW one account of the story put it at 40% but everything else, including his official website stick with "less than 50%."

stlouie_lipp · Post by **stlouie_lipp** » September 10 08, 8:39 pm

ghostrunner wrote:
stlouie_lipp wrote:I'm sorry, but I really think this guy is a phoney-baloney.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080910/ap_ ... omeback_21
Huh?

I just think he's an attention whore who needs the "spotlight" and is a PED user.

cardsfansince82 · Post by **cardsfansince82** » September 11 08, 2:10 am

stlouie_lipp wrote: I just think he's an attention whore who needs the "spotlight" and is a PED user.

I don't disagree, but he's done more for raising cancer awareness and funding research than any other person I can think of, so I give him a pass.

Simbagal23 · Post by **Simbagal23** » September 11 08, 5:59 am

cardsfansince82 wrote:
stlouie_lipp wrote: I just think he's an attention whore who needs the "spotlight" and is a PED user.
I don't disagree, but he's done more for raising cancer awareness and funding research than any other person I can think of, so I give him a pass.

Me, too. I like Lance. And, really, aren't most of the competitive cyclists using some sort of PED? Despite the tests, I think it's simply hard to catch them......I still enjoy watching the Tour de France because, PEDs or not, I'm impressed by them, it looks damn difficult.....

For the record, I think he should stay retired. He went out on top......just enjoy life now, for crying out loud. The French will be out to get him, that's for sure.

stlouie_lipp · Post by **stlouie_lipp** » September 11 08, 6:24 am

cardsfansince82 wrote:
stlouie_lipp wrote: I just think he's an attention whore who needs the "spotlight" and is a PED user.
I don't disagree, but he's done more for raising cancer awareness and funding research than any other person I can think of, so I give him a pass.

True.

GatewayRedbirds.com

Lance Armstrong needs some attention

Lance Armstrong needs some attention

Re: Lance Armstrong needs some attention

Re: Lance Armstrong needs some attention

Re: Lance Armstrong needs some attention

Re: Lance Armstrong needs some attention

Re: Lance Armstrong needs some attention

Re: Lance Armstrong needs some attention

Re: Lance Armstrong needs some attention

Re: Lance Armstrong needs some attention

Re: Lance Armstrong needs some attention