Bad photo editor? Bad photographer? Ugly product? (NSFW)

The forum for ranting, raving, complaining and praising
User avatar
Hungary Jack
Mother Earth
Posts: 19536
Joined: July 24 06, 6:03 am
Location: In Cognito

Re: Bad photo editor? Bad photographer? Ugly product?

Post by Hungary Jack »

I have no problem with this ad.

Magneto2.0
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 18100
Joined: June 16 07, 2:12 pm

Re: Bad photo editor? Bad photographer? Ugly product?

Post by Magneto2.0 »

I'm missing the ugly part of this photo.

User avatar
Radbird
There's someone in my head but it's not me
Posts: 62390
Joined: April 18 06, 5:08 pm
Location: LF Bleachers @ Busch II

Re: Bad photo editor? Bad photographer? Ugly product?

Post by Radbird »

Jocephus wrote:boing
Exactly.

User avatar
stlouie_lipp
Hallelujah Brother
Posts: 13380
Joined: April 17 06, 7:36 pm

Re: Bad photo editor? Bad photographer? Ugly product?

Post by stlouie_lipp »

cardsfansince82 wrote:I think it's just an ugly product. She should take it off immediately.
I agree.

User avatar
thrill
bronoun enthusiast
Posts: 30539
Joined: April 14 06, 10:45 pm
Location: barely online

Re: Bad photo editor? Bad photographer? Ugly product? (NSFW)

Post by thrill »

That chick is hot, but I gotta go ugly product. What is with the midriff cover? That looks weird and hard to take off.

Notice on this one how the panties and bra are separate pieces. It allows you to appreciate the midriff and also with them not being connected, it is much easier to remove them.

Image


Yes, yes, I'd definitely go with something more like this, though I wouldn't necessarily be disappointed with the original photo.

User avatar
sighyoung
Mayor of GRB
Posts: 38643
Joined: April 17 06, 7:42 pm
Location: Louisville

Re: Bad photo editor? Bad photographer? Ugly product? (NSFW)

Post by sighyoung »

thrill wrote:That chick is hot, but I gotta go ugly product. What is with the midriff cover? That looks weird and hard to take off.

Notice on this one how the panties and bra are separate pieces. It allows you to appreciate the midriff and also with them not being connected, it is much easier to remove them.

Image


Yes, yes, I'd definitely go with something more like this, though I wouldn't necessarily be disappointed with the original photo.
I have to disagree. A clear cellophane bra and panties with a red pull cord for easy opening would be preferable.

User avatar
ghostrunner
GOAT
Posts: 30870
Joined: April 18 06, 9:40 pm

Re: Bad photo editor? Bad photographer? Ugly product?

Post by ghostrunner »

docellis wrote:Image

this is the cutest thing they have for sale right now and they didn't even bother putting a model in it.

they are slacking.
I think I'm a weird guy, but stuff like this does nothing for me. I'd rather see a plain old cotton bra and panties. That or something kinkier. Too cutesy.

The first item - is there some practical reason for having it all one piece? So you don't have lines under a dress?

User avatar
sighyoung
Mayor of GRB
Posts: 38643
Joined: April 17 06, 7:42 pm
Location: Louisville

Re: Bad photo editor? Bad photographer? Ugly product? (NSFW)

Post by sighyoung »

docellis wrote:This girl is beautiful in most photos. Why did they do this? I will not buy this product. Maybe the product is the ugly thing. Maybe this is the best the photographer could do with this product.

Image
That does have a "tired and trapped in a bad relationship, but given this Victoria's Secret underwear to please my Neanderthal boyfriend" look.

Maybe something like this would have been better (except open, to show the lingerie):

Image

User avatar
InvincibleCakeEater
GRB's obsessive compulsive baseball poster
Posts: 28275
Joined: October 12 07, 12:28 pm
Location: Raptured

Re: Bad photo editor? Bad photographer? Ugly product? (NSFW)

Post by InvincibleCakeEater »

sighyoung wrote:
Image
I do not understand her appeal. She's good looking and all, but there are way hotter actresses.

User avatar
sighyoung
Mayor of GRB
Posts: 38643
Joined: April 17 06, 7:42 pm
Location: Louisville

Re: Bad photo editor? Bad photographer? Ugly product? (NSFW)

Post by sighyoung »

Oh, I'm not pushing Jennifer Biel, but a new aesthetic in underwear modeling.

Post Reply