I am the biggest dork you will ever (not) meet

The forum for ranting, raving, complaining and praising
Post Reply
User avatar
Cronos
In perpetuum
Posts: 34778
Joined: June 30 06, 7:49 am
Location: St. Louis

Re: I am the biggest dork you will ever (not) meet

Post by Cronos »

Popeye_Card wrote:
Cronos69 wrote:
Arthur Dent wrote:
Popeye_Card wrote:"Cougars" are 40-50-somethings that go out on the prowl for 20-something guys. Is a 40-50-something guy hooking up with a 20-something woman that creepy?
Isn't that the general consensus?
I would consider anyone hooking up with someone who fits in the age range of their real or potential offspring creepy, yes.
Alright, so are the cougars creepy? Or are just the men creepy?
IMO, both are.

See Doc's comment above. And yes, fetishistic is a word, Doc.

TimeForGuinness
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 20007
Joined: April 18 06, 7:38 pm

Re: I am the biggest dork you will ever (not) meet

Post by TimeForGuinness »

docellis wrote:I think anyone (male or female) that exclusively sets out to hook up with someone inordinately younger than themselves, I think that is kind of fetishistic (if that is a word).
What about the younger people hooking up with them? It takes two to tango...unless there are roofies involved.

User avatar
docellis
America's Most Beloved Twitter Joke Thief
Posts: 24741
Joined: April 18 06, 6:54 pm

Re: I am the biggest dork you will ever (not) meet

Post by docellis »

TimeForGuinness wrote:
docellis wrote:I think anyone (male or female) that exclusively sets out to hook up with someone inordinately younger than themselves, I think that is kind of fetishistic (if that is a word).
What about the younger people hooking up with them? It takes two to tango...unless there are roofies involved.

If they seek out people much older than themselves consistently - I guess you'd have to wonder what is up with that, you know?

User avatar
Cronos
In perpetuum
Posts: 34778
Joined: June 30 06, 7:49 am
Location: St. Louis

Re: I am the biggest dork you will ever (not) meet

Post by Cronos »

docellis wrote:
TimeForGuinness wrote:
docellis wrote:I think anyone (male or female) that exclusively sets out to hook up with someone inordinately younger than themselves, I think that is kind of fetishistic (if that is a word).
What about the younger people hooking up with them? It takes two to tango...unless there are roofies involved.

If they seek out people much older than themselves consistently - I guess you'd have to wonder what is up with that, you know?
Yep. Two or three years, who cares. Five to seven years, might seem odd to some but really isn't a big deal. 10 years? That can certainly happen. Rare, but certainly happens and is relatively normal.

More than that and it gets a little weird.

TimeForGuinness
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 20007
Joined: April 18 06, 7:38 pm

Re: I am the biggest dork you will ever (not) meet

Post by TimeForGuinness »

youngest age to date = half your age + 7

User avatar
Popeye_Card
GRB's most intelligent & humble poster
Posts: 31085
Joined: April 17 06, 11:25 am

Re: I am the biggest dork you will ever (not) meet

Post by Popeye_Card »

docellis wrote:I think anyone (male or female) that exclusively sets out to hook up with someone inordinately younger than themselves, I think that is kind of fetishistic (if that is a word).
I guess it could be. The traditional reasoning for cougars hunting younger prey is that they're looking for guys who can "keep up with them" in the sack, because the guys their age can't hack it anymore. The traditional reasoning for "creepy men" (as I guess we're calling them) is that, well, 20-something girls are generally hotter than the ones their age. So I guess that could be a fetish of sorts.

User avatar
Popeye_Card
GRB's most intelligent & humble poster
Posts: 31085
Joined: April 17 06, 11:25 am

Re: I am the biggest dork you will ever (not) meet

Post by Popeye_Card »

TimeForGuinness wrote:youngest age to date = half your age + 7
I've always said that it's 15% of the older one's age, and dating across "life boundaries" is generally not a good idea. i.e., A person in college shouldn't date someone in high school, person out of college shouldn't date someone in college, a free person should not date a prisoner, etc.

Arthur Dent
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 12542
Joined: April 25 06, 6:43 pm
Location: Austin

Re: I am the biggest dork you will ever (not) meet

Post by Arthur Dent »

Popeye_Card wrote:I've always said that it's 15% of the older one's age, and dating across "life boundaries" is generally not a good idea. i.e., A person in college shouldn't date someone in high school, person out of college shouldn't date someone in college, a free person should not date a prisoner, etc.
What about economic boundaries?

User avatar
haltz
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 22630
Joined: November 9 06, 6:45 am
Location: a proud midwestern metropolis

Re: I am the biggest dork you will ever (not) meet

Post by haltz »

My rule is 18 and up.

User avatar
Popeye_Card
GRB's most intelligent & humble poster
Posts: 31085
Joined: April 17 06, 11:25 am

Re: I am the biggest dork you will ever (not) meet

Post by Popeye_Card »

Arthur Dent wrote:
Popeye_Card wrote:I've always said that it's 15% of the older one's age, and dating across "life boundaries" is generally not a good idea. i.e., A person in college shouldn't date someone in high school, person out of college shouldn't date someone in college, a free person should not date a prisoner, etc.
What about economic boundaries?
Unsure on that one. Generally, you should date people you can relate to if you want to have any sort of success. If you can relate on an emotional level with someone in a completely different income bracket, then more power to you. I could see that being an issue for some though.

Of course, we're only talking about boning here though. If a 45 year old wants a one night stand with a 25 year old, I don't know if that's inherently creepy, whichever roles the genders play. I wouldn't personally do it, but I don't think I frown on it either.

Post Reply