Update: HOLLIDAY A CARD 7yr/120 million, p178

Classic threads for your viewing pleasure.
Locked
jim
Red Lobster for the seafood lover in you
Posts: 50393
Joined: May 1 06, 2:41 pm

Re: Update: Possible 5/98.5 deal with Holliday?, p162

Post by jim »

withAloe wrote:I would think 6/102 (with a NTC and opt-out after year 3 or 4) would do the trick, but that's just speculation. Not even informed speculation.
These numbers are so big and ridiculous that none of it from my view is informed. 6/102 sounds the same to me as 6/gazillion billion million trazillion.

User avatar
Eephus Speed
All-Star
Posts: 1642
Joined: August 28 09, 5:33 pm

Re: Update: Possible 5/98.5 deal with Holliday?, p162

Post by Eephus Speed »

clevername wrote:right now based on what we've heard I wouldn't go over $18 million a year. We'd always have a chance to exceed any surprise team. It's not like Boras is going to get a surprise swoop offer and just accept it on the spot. He's going to go back to any other teams in on the discussions and give them a chance to give him even more.

If some team bids more than we're willing to absolutely give, then he's gone anyway. If another team swooped in, I'd probably stop at $20-21/year. But we've been waiting for this mystery swoop the whole time and it hasn't happened. Until it does, we shouldn't overpay if we don't have to.
Agreed, though Boras could and probably does lie. He'll tell you so-and-so offered such-and-such. You either believe him or you call his bluff.

TimeForGuinness
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 20007
Joined: April 18 06, 7:38 pm

Re: Update: Possible 5/98.5 deal with Holliday?, p162

Post by TimeForGuinness »

whiterat24 wrote:
withAloe wrote:I would think 6/102 (with a NTC and opt-out after year 3 or 4) would do the trick, but that's just speculation. Not even informed speculation.
These numbers are so big and ridiculous that none of it from my view is informed. 6/102 sounds the same to me as 6/gazillion billion million trazillion.
LOL...I guess that puts Pujols at 10/sideways "8"

User avatar
st.lewis11
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 15772
Joined: June 14 06, 10:17 pm
Location: Small southern IL town, 40 min from STL

Re: Update: Possible 5/98.5 deal with Holliday?, p162

Post by st.lewis11 »

TimeForGuinness wrote:
whiterat24 wrote:
withAloe wrote:I would think 6/102 (with a NTC and opt-out after year 3 or 4) would do the trick, but that's just speculation. Not even informed speculation.
These numbers are so big and ridiculous that none of it from my view is informed. 6/102 sounds the same to me as 6/gazillion billion million trazillion.
LOL...I guess that puts Pujols at 10/sideways "8"
Was that your informed speculation?

User avatar
MrCrowesGarden
'Burb Boy
Posts: 24841
Joined: July 9 06, 11:33 am
Location: Out of the Loop

Re: Update: Possible 5/98.5 deal with Holliday?, p162

Post by MrCrowesGarden »

TimeForGuinness wrote:
whiterat24 wrote:
withAloe wrote:I would think 6/102 (with a NTC and opt-out after year 3 or 4) would do the trick, but that's just speculation. Not even informed speculation.
These numbers are so big and ridiculous that none of it from my view is informed. 6/102 sounds the same to me as 6/gazillion billion million trazillion.
LOL...I guess that puts Pujols at 10/sideways "8"
If you change that ten to another sideways 8... I am down for it.

phins
Sobbing quietly during Fox programming
Posts: 12085
Joined: June 9 06, 3:51 pm

Re: Update: Possible 5/98.5 deal with Holliday?, p162

Post by phins »

With managers cut, agent fees, and taxes, the player ends up with about 40% of the money, but I do understand even that is a crazy number to fathom.

Michael
GRB Founder
Posts: 35303
Joined: December 31 69, 6:00 pm
Location: Chicago, IL
Contact:

Re: Update: Possible 5/98.5 deal with Holliday?, p162

Post by Michael »

withAloe wrote:I would think 6/102 (with a NTC and opt-out after year 3 or 4) would do the trick, but that's just speculation. Not even informed speculation.
Michael wrote:Posters are complaining 85/5 is too high.
I was (mildly) complaining about 5/98.5. I haven't seen 5/85 mentioned anywhere.
Sorry, I meant 5/98.5 vs 6/98.5.

User avatar
clevername
Bringer of FRBG
Posts: 10380
Joined: April 16 06, 7:13 pm
Location: Alabama

Re: Update: Possible 5/98.5 deal with Holliday?, p162

Post by clevername »

withAloe wrote:
clevername wrote:right now based on what we've heard I wouldn't go over $18 million a year. We'd always have a chance to exceed any surprise team. It's not like Boras is going to get a surprise swoop offer and just accept it on the spot. He's going to go back to any other teams in on the discussions and give them a chance to give him even more.

If some team bids more than we're willing to absolutely give, then he's gone anyway. If another team swooped in, I'd probably stop at $20-21/year. But we've been waiting for this mystery swoop the whole time and it hasn't happened. Until it does, we shouldn't overpay if we don't have to.
Agreed, though Boras could and probably does lie. He'll tell you so-and-so offered such-and-such. You either believe him or you call his bluff.
true, but he's probably also not their only source. I bet there are back channels that at least allow them some idea of whether teams are interested or not. They probably don't get contract specifics, but if they think a bigger team with money is legitimately interested they can safely assume their offer is at least around what Boras is telling them.

Right now it doesn't seem like any big money team besides the Cards are legitimately interested.

Spider John
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 10952
Joined: May 18 06, 10:09 pm
Location: East of the middle of West Tennessee

Re: Update: Possible 5/98.5 deal with Holliday?, p162

Post by Spider John »

http://www.stltoday.com/blogzone/commis ... make-move/


From Goold:
“We’re getting ready to move,” La Russa told The Post-Dispatch. “I know they’ve been talking a lot with Matt. I know we have a really smart Plan B. … (It) could be on Plan A, or it could be our Plan B. The point is, we’re not going to get stuck.”
Knowing TLR's love for the man, I hope plan B isn't Chris Duncan.

Since TLR rarely tweets, I wonder if this could be Mo turning up the heat on Boras.

User avatar
Radbird
There's someone in my head but it's not me
Posts: 62389
Joined: April 18 06, 5:08 pm
Location: LF Bleachers @ Busch II

Re: Update: Possible 5/98.5 deal with Holliday?, p162

Post by Radbird »

MrCrowesGarden wrote:
TimeForGuinness wrote:
whiterat24 wrote:
withAloe wrote:I would think 6/102 (with a NTC and opt-out after year 3 or 4) would do the trick, but that's just speculation. Not even informed speculation.
These numbers are so big and ridiculous that none of it from my view is informed. 6/102 sounds the same to me as 6/gazillion billion million trazillion.
LOL...I guess that puts Pujols at 10/sideways "8"
If you change that ten to another sideways 8... I am down for it.
I would put a contract in front of Albert and ask him to fill in the years and amount. And have the mayor standing by with the keys to the city.

Locked