GOOCH wrote:I've seen it mentioned here a couple of times that there's an argument for Wilson or Taguchi related to how much we're paying them. There's not. Those are sunk costs. You can't correct a mistake (paying a bad player too much money) by making another mistake (playing that player in front of a better and more productive player). You have to pay guranteed money no matter how much the guy plays, you might as well play the guy comisserate with his ability...and now based on how much you're paying him. D.GOOCH
It's not so much a sunk costs question as it is an options question. Like I said earlier, if the difference between Rodriguez and Taguchi or Wilson is .300 to .125, then I'm sure Tony will (eventually) give up on Taguchi or Wilson and go with Rodriguez. But the likelihood that either Taguchi or Wilson will not get their averages up in the .250-.280 range is kinda low. And then the difference between them and Rodriguez becomes smaller (considering the defensive - for Taguchi -, and power - for Wilson - differentials).
Sending Rodriguez down does not lose him, it just postpones his contribution. He may not be able to do that with Taguchi, and most likely no chance to do that with Wilson. What if he were to decide to release Taguchi or Wilson, and then Rodriguez falls flat, or gets injured?
I sort of disagree with Fat_Strat, in that Tony hasn't often dumped players with guaranteed salaries in favor of younger ones under our control, unless (a) that salaried player clearly had little to no value (e.g., Cedeno, but only after sticking with him far too long), or (b) if the player didn't have the right clubhouse "attitude" that Tony seeks (which is obviously not the case for Taguchi, and probably not Wilson either).
Ironically a couple of years ago it was Taguchi who kept getting sent down to Louisville despite putting up better numbers than some of his counterparts on the big club (most notably Roger Cedeno), precisely because he was the guy who had options.