Page 2 of 4
Posted: April 28 07, 9:42 pm
by StL Dan
TimeForGuinness wrote:StL Dan wrote:This is great news for Saint Louis basketball!
Nicely done.
I really want to see SLU and Mizzou play each other regularly now that both programs have no nonsense coaches that are going to put teams on the floor that reflect their personalities and style.
Mizzou doesn't like playing SLU...cuts into their recruiting. Definitely won't happen now that Maj is there
Yea, I know. But, that is a lame excuse and I want to see it happen on a regular basis.
Posted: April 29 07, 12:07 am
by Transmogrified Tiger
Mizzou has nothing to gain from playing SLU, or Mo State for that matter. Why should they play them?
Posted: April 29 07, 1:06 am
by Richie Allen
Transmogrified Tiger wrote:Mizzou has nothing to gain from playing SLU, or Mo State for that matter. Why should they play them?
U of I has the same attitude with Bradley and ISU. And I have always hated that attitude.
My argument would be that they should play them because great rivalries could develop and that's pretty much been the basis for all sports over the past 125 years. Exciting, memorable games for their fans. That's something to gain.
Posted: April 29 07, 8:30 am
by TimeForGuinness
Transmogrified Tiger wrote:Mizzou has nothing to gain from playing SLU, or Mo State for that matter. Why should they play them?
Spoken like true cowards.
Mizzou sucks anyways.
Posted: April 29 07, 12:02 pm
by StL Dan
Transmogrified Tiger wrote:Mizzou has nothing to gain from playing SLU, or Mo State for that matter. Why should they play them?
Why shouldn't they play in state DI opponents?
TimeForGuiness....I'm not a coward. I've been a Missouri fan for 30 years, and I would welcome an annual matchup with SLU and Missouri State.
Posted: April 29 07, 12:47 pm
by Transmogrified Tiger
TimeForGuinness wrote:Transmogrified Tiger wrote:Mizzou has nothing to gain from playing SLU, or Mo State for that matter. Why should they play them?
Spoken like true cowards.
Mizzou sucks anyways.
This is exactly the point. Mizzou is always going to be the bigger, power conference school, so if they win they were supposed to, and if they lose then they get the humiliation of losing to their small, in-state brethren. Unless SLU or Mo State find themselves at a Gonzaga level of sustained performance and perception, then it's not worth it for Mizzou to play them. It can't help, it can only hurt.
Posted: April 29 07, 1:55 pm
by StL Dan
Transmogrified Tiger wrote:TimeForGuinness wrote:Transmogrified Tiger wrote:Mizzou has nothing to gain from playing SLU, or Mo State for that matter. Why should they play them?
Spoken like true cowards.
Mizzou sucks anyways.
This is exactly the point. Mizzou is always going to be the bigger, power conference school, so if they win they were supposed to, and if they lose then they get the humiliation of losing to their small, in-state brethren. Unless SLU or Mo State find themselves at a Gonzaga level of sustained performance and perception, then it's not worth it for Mizzou to play them. It can't help, it can only hurt.
Why does this perception exist? It's ridiculous.
Mizzou losing to another in-state D1 program would *not* be on par with "humiliation".
Posted: April 29 07, 1:57 pm
by clevername
it would be viewed as an upset, though, and the team that gets upset never benefits from that.
Posted: April 29 07, 2:27 pm
by StL Dan
clevername wrote:it would be viewed as an upset, though, and the team that gets upset never benefits from that.
I don't even know how to respond to that.
Are you saying MU should only play teams that are perceived to be "better" than them?
Matchups with SLU and MO State is good for the fans and good for the game no matter who wins or loses.
Posted: April 29 07, 2:32 pm
by clevername
StL Dan wrote:clevername wrote:it would be viewed as an upset, though, and the team that gets upset never benefits from that.
I don't even know how to respond to that.
Are you saying MU should only play teams that are perceived to be "better" than them?
Matchups with SLU and MO State is good for the fans and good for the game no matter who wins or loses.
not what I'm saying, but when you're a big program in a state and you want to attract the best players your state produces you don't schedule a competing smaller school in your state who could beat you while a recruit watches.
Every game they schedule is a potential loss. That's the way basketball is these days. Factoring in the effect losing to an instate competing school is the key here.
Same thing happens back home with Auburn and Alabama playing schools like UAB. It's happened a few times, but they avoid it as much as possible.