Posted: May 1 07, 2:56 pm
That's what I remember (although I was very young) liking most about Sportsman's Park.G. Keenan wrote:It is woven into the fabric of the neighborhood and the city like no other park I've been to.
A Message Board Dedicated to Discussing St. Louis Cardinals Baseball!
https://gatewayredbirds.org/forum/
That's what I remember (although I was very young) liking most about Sportsman's Park.G. Keenan wrote:It is woven into the fabric of the neighborhood and the city like no other park I've been to.
Sportsman's Park is one of the things I wish I could have seen. I know downtown STL needs an engine down there to stay alive, but St. Louis's best aspect is its awesome neighborhoods, and a ballpark that was part of that scene would be awesome.Radbird wrote:That's what I remember (although I was very young) liking most about Sportsman's Park.G. Keenan wrote:It is woven into the fabric of the neighborhood and the city like no other park I've been to.
Wrigler is a pit, but still a great place to watch a game. The Cell (White Sox home) is much more comfortable in terms food, facilities, moving around, but certainly lacks the ambience of Wrigley.AJ wrote:mikechamp wrote: What ballparks do you like most without thinking about the history of a Wrigley or Fenway?
ROB NEYER
I like those two best, even absent the history.
-
HUH???Wrigley is a toilet even with the history, I know they have fixed up Fenway some.... but Wrigley is a dump.
the cell????? ugh i hate it. wont go back there againHungary Jack wrote:Wrigler is a pit, but still a great place to watch a game. The Cell (White Sox home) is much more comfortable in terms food, facilities, moving around, but certainly lacks the ambience of Wrigley.AJ wrote:mikechamp wrote: What ballparks do you like most without thinking about the history of a Wrigley or Fenway?
ROB NEYER
I like those two best, even absent the history.
-
HUH???Wrigley is a toilet even with the history, I know they have fixed up Fenway some.... but Wrigley is a dump.